regulate the indoor artificial tanning industry‚ but instead the parents of the minor. Deeper economic issues‚ a progressing invasive government‚ and even an interference with one of our inalienable rights are all reasons to oppose this potential new law. Not only is the Federal government banning indoor tanning for minors‚ but applying a 10% tax as well. Businesses will lose revenue due to a loss of income from a large percentage of customers being under 18. Ultimately‚ tanning salons across the
Premium Sun tanning United States Declaration of Independence Federal government of the United States
Roo Events Pte Ltd 11 Arc Road Singapore 982156 10 JUNE 2012 Corporate Gifts INC Ah Hood Avenue 4 Singapore 131474 Dear James‚ My purpose of writing this letter regarding the 200 cups I ordered from your company. As your long time customer‚ I am shock when I received the goods. Out of the 200 we ordered‚ there are 100 cups with cracks on it and 50 cups are in the wrong colour ! For the past 10 years‚ Roo Events Pte Ltd had been ordering corporate gifts from your company. From your
Premium Customer service Corporation Customer
and then only managed to do so under heavy doses of tranquilizers prescribed by her doctor‚ Morton Mallard. Consider the following when writing this essay: · Was a crime committed? · Was there any negligence involved in this case? · What laws and rights were violated? · Who should be held liable for the damages (physical and mental)? · Discuss the possible tort liability in this incident. Assault‚ battery‚ infliction of emotional distress‚ and false imprisonment all should be
Premium Tort law Tort
to give back the ring. Rodger sued and Janis appealed. The main purpose of this article is to decide whether the receiver of an engagement ring must return the ring or its equivalent value when the donor breaks the engagement. Pennsylvania law treats the giving of an engagement ring as a conditional gift. “ A gift given by a man to woman on condition that she will embark on the sea of matrimony with him is no different from a gift based on the condition that the receiver sail on any other
Premium Contract Law Supreme Court of the United States
co reconditioned and repaired the scooter. And sold it to Mr. A for Rs 50‚000. ABC and co told Mr. A that the scooter is a new scooter. Is Mr. A a consumer? And does he have any remedy under consumer protection act Mr. Q was going abroad for a business trip for two months. He wanted to give a power of attorney to his friend. Hence Mr. Q sent the Power of attorney in a PDF form through an Email. Is this power of attorney valid? White Detergents ltd was a leading detergent brand in the market
Premium Contract Breach of contract Consumer protection
immediately the car was sold to him. Having to hear that the car was already been sold‚ the plaintiffs wish to sue Defendant for breach of contract. This will depend on whether there is a valid contract formed in each respective case. Rules/Principle The law of contract: There must be a legally binding contract between two or more parties. On
Premium Law Contract Common law
Respondent: Led to permanent injury. Interviewer: (81:13) But how did the actions of your friend and your play dad‚ that their actions led to you having permanent injury? Respondent: No. My play dad didn’t even… My friend‚ yes is… Yes‚ he is responsible for my injury. Interviewer: (81:36) What was it that… Let me just get this right. You’re saying it led to greater… Your friend’s actions led to you having a greater injury? Respondent: Mm-hmm (agreement). Interviewer: (81:49) What exactly did he do
Premium Injury Psychology Injuries
MULTIPLE CHOICES 1. Employment and Labor Regulations - Major Labor Relations Acts‚ Norris-La Guardia Act‚ Injunctions Prohibited‚ “yellow-dog” contracts. C.16‚ p.481 Employees agree not to join a union or risk being fired if they do. 2. Employment and Labor Regulations - Major Labor Relations Acts‚ The Landrum-Griffin Act of 1959‚ what does the Landrum-Griffin Act provide to protect union members? C.16‚ p.482 Act intended to assure that union members are protected from improper actions
Premium Supreme Court of the United States
Harvey vs Facey. Harvey sent a telegram to Facey starting ‘Will you sell us Bumper Hall Pen? Telegraph lowest price’. Face replied‚ “ Lowest price 900 POUND. Harvey telegraphed back‚ “ We agree to buy for 900 Pound.’ Face declined to sell and Harvey brought the matter to court. The court held that Facey’s reply was not an offer to sell for 900Pound but was only merely furnishing information which later may or may not be used in negotiations leading to sale. Patridge vs Crittenden Patridge inserted
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Invitation to treat
Law and Corporate Managers – Prof. Larry Franklin Question Two A. (i) For refusal In order to honor the LC‚ the Seller has to comply exactly with the terms of the letter of credit. There are numerous typo errors in the LC and misspellings of the destination port and the Seller name‚ hence only a waiver of the discrepancies from JFTC will enable Bank of China to pay the Seller. As long as the waiver is not received‚ the BOC cannot make any payments. BOC has to state why it is not going to
Premium Contract Corporation Types of business entity