Weldon 1 Animal Testing Introduction Thesis Statement: Animal testing is wrong because it is inhumane‚ costly‚ and unpredictable. I. Animal testing is inhumane A. Torture B. Type of testing C. Effect on the animal II. Animal testing is costly A. The cost of testing B. The cost of research C. What else we could be spending money on III. Animal testing is wasteful and unpredictable A. Mass Murdering of animals B. Endangered species C. If it works on animals it may not work on humans Conclusion
Premium Animal testing The Animals Million
Animal Testing: Unnecessary Cruelty Ever since 1970‚ when an Australian philosopher brought up the idea of animal rights‚ it has been a difficult topic with many different views and opinions on whether or not non-human animals have the required set of qualities to be entitled to rights protecting them from cruelty. What many don’t know is that the roots of the movement date back way much further from a handful of Greek philosophers and thinkers(The Animal Rights Debate). All stating that humans
Premium Fur Human Leonardo da Vinci
361 Commitment & Choice November 14‚ 2012 The Rights of Animals When we say that all human beings‚ referring to both men and women‚ whatever their race or sex may be are created equal‚ what is it that we are actually proclaiming? Peter Singer‚ writer of “All Animals are Equal” aims to advocate to us as readers to make the mental switch in respect to our attitudes toward a species other than our own. And by this I am referring to animals. R.G Frey takes on a very different position that he
Free Human Morality Meaning of life
Ethics of Animal Testing An animal’s life in a laboratory is a cold‚ unhappy and unhealthy way of living. So‚ lucky for Libby she was rescued just in time. Libby is a small dog that spent many of her years in an animal testing laboratory. She was kept in very unhealthy and filthy conditions. Although Libby was not an old dog when she was rescued‚ she had severe tooth decay and was terribly emaciated. Her body was desperately trying to fend of the parasitic hookworms and tapeworms that lived
Premium Animal rights Animal rights Animal testing
Home office (2017) animal testing “remains a vital tool” especially when carrying out research into diseases and in developing “new medicines‚ treatments and technologies”. Scientists state that animal testing is effective as animals are biologically similar to humans and so can provide scientists with ‘important clues about diseases’ Animal testing also means new drugs can be tested for possible side effects‚ before the drug is given to humans in clinical trials (Understanding animal research‚2013‚
Premium Animal rights Animal testing People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
there is no such thing as animal testing. One day your kid gets sick‚ deadly sick with smallpox‚ you take them to the hospital‚ they inject your kid with a bunch of random medicines to try and help but nothing helps. Your child later dies because there was no way to help‚ all of those doctor bills‚ useless injections‚ and the death of your child could have been avoided if there was animal testing to find the cure. Animal testing is needed in our world‚ we need animal testing to find cures for deadly
Premium Death Patient Pregnancy
Literature Review: Annotations Books: Hayhurst‚ Chris. Animal Testing: The Animal Rights Debate. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group‚ Inc. 2000. Print. Summary/Description: This book discusses the pros and cons of animal testing. It gives a brief history of the animal right movement‚ and It also address the legal and ethical issues involved around this cruel testing. The Animal Act was rejected by Congress in the United States and animal testing became a part of scientific and medical life. Evaluation/Assessment:
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Medical research
Animal testing has been used for centuries to improve the lives of humans since 322 B.C. by greek and roman physicians‚ Aristotle and Erasistratus. These greek and roman physicians first performed animal testing with dissections to obtain more knowledge about the animals they chose to test in their experiments. However‚ the scientists that first introduced animal testing‚ failed to realize that humans and animals do not have the same lineage. Their intentions were to advance scientific
Premium Animal rights Experiment Stanford prison experiment
AGAINST ANIMAL TESTING! The question is not‚ "Can they reason?" nor‚ "Can they talk?" but rather‚ "Can they suffer?" Did you know that over a hundred million animals get injured or die due to animal testing? But when you think about is it actually legal? So the thing is it doesn’t matter what we think because there are people who want themselves to live a better life then the animals and they do experimentation on the animals just so humans can live a better life. And
Premium Animal rights Animal welfare Experiment
Daylen Elosegui Extra Credit 02-20-2013 The Ethics of Animal Testing Years ago‚ while laws were not in place to prevent testing on animals‚ some researchers experimented on animals. The results of these experiments are still with us today. Insulin for example‚ was discovered when an Ontario doctor severed the connection between the pancreas and the digestive system of a dog.1 Today there are still many animals in labs being tested to find treatment for anything from cancer
Premium Utilitarianism