Radiography (2005) 11‚ 55e59 REVIEW ARTICLE Critiquing a research article Gill Marshall) Division of Medical Imaging Sciences‚ St. Martin’s College‚ Lancaster LA1 3JD‚ UK Accepted 16 September 2004 Available online 1 December 2004 KEYWORDS Critical reading; Peer review; Literature; Journal review Abstract This article explores certain concepts relating to critiquing research papers. These include considering the peer review process for publication‚ demonstrating the need for critiquing
Premium Academic publishing Peer review Scientific method
is intended to help you in your project assignment and is divided into five (5) sections: I. Objective of the project assignment. II. General guidelines. III. Example of journals/periodicals IV. Words of reminder. V. Peer review I. OBJECTIVE OF PROJECT ASSIGNMENT The objective of this project assignment is to help students: i. Develop an understanding of ethics in accounting. Students would understand the importance of ethics on professions such
Premium Ethics Business ethics Accountancy
available on particular topics. Evidence scans provide a rapid collation of empirical research about a topic relevant to the Health Foundation ’s work. Although all of the evidence is sourced and compiled systematically‚ they are not systematic reviews. They do not seek to summarise theoretical
Premium Health care Evidence-based medicine Health care provider
Broadstock Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This systematic review was undertaken by staff of the New Zealand Guidelines Group‚ and completed in September 2009. The scope of the review was agreed with the Living Guidelines Group project’s sponsor‚ Joanna Curzon (Ministry of Health) and was funded by the Ministry of Health to contribute to the work of the Living Guideline Group. Marita Broadstock (Senior Researcher) conducted the review and prepared the report and Evidence Tables. Margaret Paterson
Premium Randomized controlled trial Evidence-based medicine Applied behavior analysis
Lindsay Sedam Mid Term Portfolio Martin 24 October‚ 2014 Retrospective Essay Part of growing as a writer is looking back at what you’ve done and seeing how far you’ve come. In order to grow‚ you need to be able recognize where you started and where you are now. You need to be able to see what areas you’re strong at; as well as‚ the areas you need to continue to improve upon. Starting out this semester‚ I didn’t know where I stood or where I could go next as a writer. Until now. I feel like I
Free Writing Paper Peer review
research. What is your practice area; clinical‚ education‚ or administration? (This is NOT where you will list your PICO question) Step 3: How was the practice issues identified? How did you come to know this was a problem in your clinical practice? Review the listed concerns and check all that apply. Step 4: What evidence must be gathered? Everyone should have a literature search. However‚ what other sources of reliable information will be helpful for your particular question? Step 5: What terms will
Premium Research Patient Randomized controlled trial
According to the Australian Constitution‚ the power to make laws vested in the parliament ‚ whilst the power to interpret laws and to judge whether they apply in individual cases‚ vested in the High Court and other federal courts. In fact‚ one of the major function of the high court is to interpret the Constitution. For instance‚ the High Court of Australia may rule a law to be unconstitutional‚ that is beyond the power of parliament to make‚ and therefore of no effect. Such a circumstance would
Premium Separation of powers Law Constitution
Experiences in Delivering Project with Zero Defects Srikanth Rao Usual Reactions on Zero Defects in Software Projects “Are you kidding me?. It is a miracle. How can we expect zero defects in software development? It is harder to define‚ harder to test‚ harder to predict results. Bugs is a perfectly normal thing‚ we can’t bring them to zero. But we should minimize them using all possible ways. ”The Last Bug is a mirage” Like any other PM‚ I started with a “Zero Defects Mentality” which
Premium Team Management Quality management system
Economics 11. Rights Based Programming 12. Sexual Exploitation 13. Children’s Participation 14. Situation of Migrants/Refugees’ Children 15. Child Abuse and Violence 16. Children in Residential Care 17. Children and Family IJCRR contains book review section for wider dissemination of literatures to researchers and policy makers. The criteria for paper publication in IJCRR are: (a)
Premium War Peer review Jammu and Kashmir
powers the Judicial Branch has given to them by Act 3 of the Constitution. One of the most if not the most important power is Judicial Review‚ this gives the Judicial Branch the power to rule whether a law passed by Congress and signed by the President is unconstitutional. How did the Supreme Court acquire the power of judicial review? The power of Judicial Review wasn’t established as a specific provision in the words of the Constitution but during the Supreme Court case of Marbury vs Madison
Premium Separation of powers Law Supreme Court of the United States