MOOT COURT PROBLEM 172109831117 IN THE HONOURABLE MOOT COURT/HIGH COURT OF A.P UNDER APPELLETE JURISDICTION (CIVIL APPEAL NO: 2012) BETWEEN: SUJATHA---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPELLENT AND
Premium Marriage
MOOT PROBLEM Jitender Sharma was a young boy of 18 years of age. He fell in love with Poonam Sharma who was a girl of 16 years of age. One day they eloped from their respective homes and finally got married as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Poonam’s family members were against this marriage. Even her Grand Father and Paternal uncle were not ready to accept this marriage at any cost. They threatened Poonam of her life and safety. Thereafter Poonam’s father lodge First Information Report (FIR) against
Premium Marriage Delhi
UQ Moot Court Bench Mooting Manual Contents Page Introduction.......................................................................................... 2 Approaching a Moot Problem .............................................................. 2 Researching the Problem .................................................................... 3 Written Submissions............................................................................ 4 The Oral Element of the Moot...............................
Premium Law Common law
Jeremy Cooper Moot Court 1 The Constitutionality of the “Slave trade Act” The question before the Court is the constitutionality of the Slave Trade Act. The bill was first proposed by Congressman Weber in 1858 in an attempt to prohibit the sale of slaves in the United States. The bill was passed into law in the spring of 1859. The petitioner congressman Ryan Suter‚ argues that the Slave Trade Act is unconstitutional. According to the court Suter argues “slaves are likened to property‚ the
Premium United States Constitution Commerce Clause United States Congress
FIRST MOOT COURT CASE IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY IN THE MATTER OF SUNITA ………..PETITIONER Vs. UKO Bank ………..RESPONDENT COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT Most Respectfully Submitted to the Hon’ble Judge of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay At Bombay TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INDEX OF AUTHORITIES 2. REFERENCE 3. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 4. STATEMENT
Premium Criminal law Tort Tort law
Moot Court Competn-2008-Case ICSI CORPORATE LAW MOOT COURT PROBLEM 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI C.P.No: 36 of 2007 Paolo Luscini & Co. (PL) …… Petitioners V RELIVE CO. LTD …… Respondent 1. RELIVE CO.LTD was incorporated in the year 1971 in the State of Maharashtra with the object of carrying on the business of media and telecommunications. The paid-up share capital of the company was 130 million comprising of 13 million shares of Rs. 10 each. The Company initially
Premium Money Stock Balance sheet
NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY‚ ODISHA CUTTACK CONSTITUTIOANAL LAW –I MOOT PROBLEM [1]. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan‚ a great Muslim social reformer and statesman in 1877‚ for the educational regeneration of Muslims in India started the Muhammadan Anglo— Oriental (M.A.O. College) College at Aligarh‚ a town in the State of Uttar Pradesh. His objective was to build a college in tune with the British education system but without compromising its Islamic values. Sir Syed’s son‚ Syed Mahmood‚ had studied at Cambridge
Premium Uttar Pradesh Aligarh Muslim University Syed Ahmed Khan
DEPARTMENT OF LAW " MOOT COURT MEMORIAL" written submission on behalf of counsel for prosecution MOOT COURT MEMORIAL Submitted by : XXX Class :LLB xxx Sem Roll No:XXX Teacher Incharge XXXXXXXXXXX
Premium Crime Judge Lawyer
General Outline of a Moot Court Argument INTRO May it please the court‚ my name is _____ and I represent the Petitioner/Respondent __(name)___. [REBUTTAL REQUEST & PROCEDURAL BLURB (for Petitioner ONLY)] With the court’s permission‚ I would like to reserve 2 minutes for rebuttal. Thank you. This case is on appeal from the District/Circuit Court (name of court). The District/Circuit Court denied Petitioner’s request for _____‚ holding _____. ROADMAP Your honors‚ _______ is a
Premium Judge Question Law
11-11-11 By Huang Jie MOOT COURT TRAINING 1 HOW TO LAWYERING IN FRONT OF JURY AND JUDGES? 11-11-11 ¢ 1. Know your audience: age‚ gender‚ occupation‚ what will appeal to them‚ what will offend them‚ put yourself into your audience’s shoes to consider what they will want to hear ¢ 2. A strong opening statement: summarize the case in a compelling way 2 By Huang Jie CALDER V. JONES SIFT Law Jie Huang 3 ¢ 3. Have a theme: Simple‚ easy-to-understand‚ and
Premium Audience theory Audience Jury