elow is a diagram of the hierarchy of the Irish court system. Civil Courts Civil courts deals with civil or private wrongs. In a Civil case the burden required is on the balance of probabilities. In most civil cases there will be a plaintiff and a defendant‚ the plaintiff sues the defendant. In civil proceedings the judgment would be to impose a settlement on the matter. eg‚ awarding damages‚ an injunction or an order for specific performance. Land law‚ employment law‚ contractual law‚ consumer
Free Criminal law Law Appeal
structure of the English courts within which a decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower in the hierarchy. However‚ there have been occasions where the Court of Appeal departed from the decisions of the House of Lords this has been treated with hostility by the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeal is bound by decisions of the House of Lords even if it considers them to be wrong. It was also bound by its own decision‚ however in Young v Bristol Aeroplane‚ the Court of Appeal held that
Premium Stare decisis Case law
Interstate 80‚ seen here in Berkeley‚ California‚ is a freeway with many lanes and heavy traffic. Traffic on roads may consist of pedestrians‚ ridden or herded animals‚ vehicles‚ streetcars and other conveyances‚ either singly or together‚ while using the public way for purposes of travel. Traffic laws are the laws which govern traffic and regulate vehicles‚ while rules of the road are both the laws and the informal rules that may have developed over time to facilitate the orderly and timely flow
Premium Road Traffic Road transport
horrible public relations move‚ because it made Ryder look arrogant and disrespectful at such a serious time; showed that she had enough money to buy such an expensive car; and proved her lack of repentance. The articles of clothing that Ryder wore to court were also under great speculation. She proudly wore the same brands of clothing that she had stolen from Saks Fifth Avenue. Many things were wrong with this; because it proves once again that she can afford to own these clothes and obviously‚ she
Premium Hannah Montana Miley Cyrus Disney Channel
Justices deny review over students’ religious messages in classroom By Bill Mears‚ CNN Supreme Court Producer updated 3:41 PM EDT‚ Mon June 11‚ 2012 STORY HIGHLIGHTS Washington (CNN) -- In what have become known as the "Jesus pencil" and "candy cane" cases‚ the Supreme Court refused Monday to consider appeals from the families of elementary school students over distribution of religious-themed gifts on campus. At issue was whether school officials can be sued for violating the First Amendment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
VOL 18 NO -301 REGD NO DA 1589 | Dhaka‚ Saturday September 3 2011 Mobile courts and independence of judiciary M S Siddiqui In a democratic country it is a prerequisite that all citizens get economic and social justice. The economically deprived people need either free or state sponsored legal assistance to get justice and fair trial. This will uphold human rights and equality. This is a component of rule of law for any society. It is not a charity‚ but a civil right of the citizens. It ensures
Premium Judge Law Separation of powers
The history evolution of the federal courts began to evolve as early as the Constitutional Convention held in 1787. It was during the Constitutional Convention that a resolution was adopted that “a national judiciary be established” (Neubauer & Fradella‚ 2008‚ p. 65). Of course‚ there was considerable disagreement between federalists and anti-federalists. The disagreement surrounded the fact the anti-federalists feared that individual liberties could be weakened. According to Neubauer and Fradella
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
Have YOU ever heard of Youth Court? The Niskayuna Youth Court is offered as an alternative to the young people who have committed a crime in our community‚ instead of the criminal justice system. The Niskayuna Youth Court is run by two favorites of the high school student body- Mr. Stroebel and business teacher Mrs. Lindsay. People go to Youth Court after they have pleaded guilty to a crime to appear before a jury of their peers. The student jury then hears the evidence‚ and makes a decision about
Premium
Would it be to the advantage of the taxpayer and the juveniles to split the juvenile courts into two sections? Explain in detail why or why not. There would a lot of people favorable circumstances of the taxpaying and the juveniles with part those adolescent courts under two areas since it will profit taxpaying and juveniles by Part under segments. Toward finishing that status wrongdoers will get a greater amount help What’s more treat similarly as a minor wrongdoing offender‚ which they don’t
Premium Crime Criminology Criminal justice
United States Supreme Court‚ Missouri v. Frye‚ and Lafler v. Cooper and found to be unconstitutional for violating requirements listed in Strickland vs Washington‚ people still declare they cannot see a clear violation of one’s sixth amendment right in regardless to plea bargains. In conclusion‚ individuals on both sides of plea bargaining can dispute the amendment rights found within the plea agreement and argue why they are or are not being violated‚ even though court ruling have been brought
Premium Law Crime Supreme Court of the United States