Introduction It is widely accepted that educating and training students in moral competence is not just useful but obligatory in classroom practice. The fact that numerous moral topics and situations are constantly encountered in life gives rise to an essential need for educators to facilitate opportunities for moral learning and development. (Ludecke-Plumer‚ 2007) This can be accomplished by educating students on the different facets of life including ideals of justice and social expectation. (Henry
Premium Kohlberg's stages of moral development Jean Piaget Morality
In A Defense of Moral Relativism‚ Ruth Benedict argues that normal behavior varies from society to society; therefore‚ what’s morally right for one society can be morally wrong for another. To support this argument‚ Benedict mentions how certain cultures practice what’s “abnormal” to us without any difficulty. She goes further to give examples of traits that are abnormal to us such as‚ “sadism or delusions grandeur or of persecution” (Benedict‚ 1934‚ p.1) and concludes saying that “these abnormal
Premium Morality Ethics Cultural relativism
Corporations are moral agents I chose to evaluate the second debate because I thought it was the most significant to the purpose of the class: to analyze the moral responsibility of business. The debaters were assigned to negate and affirm the following motion: Corporations are Moral Agents. In my opinion‚ this motion comes down to the decision to hold corporations responsible for their (corporations) decisions on a moral basis or just hold them responsible for their decisions on a legal basis
Premium Decision making Morality
The Arguments for the Existence of God Out of the four arguments for the existence of a God‚ the Cosmological argument is the most persuasive. For thousands of years‚ humans have wondered what their purpose on Earth is and how we came to exist. Because of this wondering‚ many humans have concluded that there is an all-powerful creator who created the universe and everything in it. But‚ since we cannot see this creator and have no evidence as proof of his existence‚ there are many people who doubt
Premium Ontology Teleological argument Existence
Contemporary Moral Issues Philosophy 215 Fall 2014 Instructor: Valerie Philbrick-DeBrava Office: James Blair 132 Email: vaphilbrickdeb@wm.edu Office Hours: MWF 9:00-10:00 Phone: (804) 642-4621 Course Times: MWF 10:00-10:50 (01) Course Location: James Blair 201 MWF 11:00-11:50 (02) Course Description: Philosophy 215 is designed to improve our understanding of the moral issues our twenty-first-century society faces. As both a survey of
Premium Morality Philosophy Writing
The Argument for Utilitarianism Among the ethical arguments that we have seen‚ it is clear that a form of utilitarianism is the best option‚ that is‚ we should always do what brings about the best outcome where the outcomes are rated by the amount of good they bring about. The utilitarian argument says that in any given decision‚ the option that brings about the most good is the right thing to do every time. That being said‚ the definition of good is extremely important to the soundness of the
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Morality
Cleanthes’ argument begins by predicating that God is a benevolent and all-perfect being. This led to the study of the order and design of the universe coming from the Teleological Argument from Design. The world is the most perfect‚ complicated machine ever made. “The curious adapting of means to ends‚ throughout all nature‚ resembles exactly‚ though it much exceeds‚ the productions of human. designs‚ thought‚ wisdom‚ and intelligence.” (Cleanthes) We know what human traits it takes to make machines
Premium
The moral guide that American society should use for making moral decisions is moral absolutism. This means that I agree that certain moral ideas should be universally accepted. There are many different cultures and customs and each has their own ideas regarding their own truths and what is moral. There can be so many different views of what is right and wrong depending on the culture and their own beliefs. However‚ there are certain moral ideas that should be universal. Regarding moral relativism
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
It can be argued though‚ that we are not free unless we are able to choose between alternatives. A counter argument to this is that‚ so long as “I could have done otherwise” means “I could have done otherwise‚ but I didn’t want to”‚ then it was my own choice that prevented me from doing otherwise‚ and what I did was of my own free will. This classical compatibilist
Premium Free will Determinism Causality
Moral relativism is the view that standards‚ morality‚ and positions of right and wrong are culturally based. This meaning that a person’s ancestry‚ religion‚ or any other factor could greatly affect his/her own views of what is right or wrong. Furthermore‚ it has been accepted as a moral philosophy of a society‚ while others think of it as a misconception. While they may have their own opinions‚ moral relativism is an idea that is very plausible. Although while viewing this idea‚ there is one main
Premium Morality Ethics Religion