Smith‚ Jessica October 16‚ 2012 Moral Decisions In life there are always either negative or positive consequences when an action is made. In Martin Luther King Jr.’s essay “Letter from Birmingham Jail‚” he evaluates how one can advocate breaking some laws and obeying others. The reason it is possible to do such a thing is because there are two different types of laws‚ just and unjust. Depending on one’s morals‚ it can be morally right to advocate breaking some laws and obeying others
Premium Morality Ethics Law
three questions. Theory What moral statements express What moral statements describe What makes moral statements true or false Objective moral facts: Objective wrongness of torturing kittens. Objective moral facts: Objective wrongness of torturing kittens. Moral code of speaker’s culture: Disapproval of torturing kittens by speaker’s culture. Moral code of person’s culture (not necessarily speaker). Disapproval of torturing kittens by that person’s culture. Any objective moral facts?
Premium Ethics Morality Aesthetics
the end of Anthem‚ Equality has denounced his commitment to the moral beliefs that his society shares. His society believes that everything must be done for the good of everyone. In the end of the book he decides that it is better for man to worry about themselves first. The main point of Rand’s essay‚ “How does One lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society?” is that we as people need to make moral judgements. Equality made a moral judgement to no longer follow the ideas of the society that he
Premium Morality Human Moral
forms much of the conversation in the story. The book gives a clear picture of the moral standards during the 1600s in Austria seen through the narration. In a way‚ the world has different‚ people falling in diverse groups. Much of what happens in the world draws down to personal moral standards that compel ethical behavior. The book talks about issues surrounding individuals and the factors that influence their moral standards. Comparatively‚ there are similarities between the 1600s period and the
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
Louis Pojman stands for objectivism instead of relativism in morality. Ethical relativism is “the theory that there are no universally valid moral principles”. Ethical relativism however is different from moral doubt where valid moral principles do not exist at all. Pojman argues that what is considered as morally right or wrong varies from society to society. Pojman proposes that ethical relativism can be seen as a good thing but can get hard when getting into the details. Ethical relativism is
Premium Morality Ethics Truth
Cultural relativism is the moral theory that states that morality is created together by many individual groups of humans and morality therefore is not fixed‚ but rather varies from culture to culture‚ peoples‚ and different contextual situations. Cultural relativism preaches that certain practices are always morally permissible for a culture as long as the members of the culture see it as morally right. For example if a culture has a traditional custom that believes it’s okay for them to eat the
Premium Morality Ethics Cultural relativism
Doing the wrong thing for the right reason is wrong because‚ there are many ways to help a person in need without stealing from anyone. If you had morals that you follow then you decided to not follow them‚ then this could cause guilt that would most likely stay without for a while. Guilt could overcome you do something wrong while also having good morals that you follow and set for yourself. Elder Davis said “Guilt is to the spirit‚ what pain‚ is to the body. In 6th grade there was a question on
Premium Morality Ethics Human
Questions 1. Complete the following statements by filling in the blanks with either “moral” or “nonmoral” (eg.‚ factual‚ scientific‚ legal): a. Whether or not dumping should be permitted is a moral question. b. “Are dangerous products of any use in the third world?” is a nonmoral (scientific) question. c. “Is it proper for the U.S. government to sponsor the export of products overseas?” is a moral question. d. Weather or not the notification system works as its supporters claim
Premium Morality Ethics Third World
what the morals of individual cultures say. Others‚ such as James Rachels‚ believe that there is a universal code of ethics that transcends the moral codes of individual cultures. In his essay‚ “Morality is Not Relative”‚ Rachels discusses ethical relativism‚ or as he calls it “Cultural Relativism”‚ and the logical problems that are associated with this code. Cultural
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Ethics
idea of “change if you love me”‚ and how the exterior‚ the physical appearance can both positively and negatively impact confidence‚ and as a byproduct‚ either encourage faithful or unfaithful behavior. The black comedy of the play arises from the moral uncertainty wherein the audience is asked the rhetoric question “is it right to change someone for the sake of art?” The students that it was morally wrong to manipulate people for the sake of art. This concept was widely agreed upon by the year 12
Premium Morality Ethics Moral