1. a. whether or not dumping should be permitted is a moral question. b. “Are dangerous products of any use in the third world?” is a nonmoral (scientific) question. c. “Is it proper for the U.S. government to sponsor the export of dangerous products oversea?” is a moral question. d. Whether or not the notification system works as its supporters claim works it nonmoral (factual) question. e. “Is it legal to dump this product overseas?” is a nonmoral (legal) question. 2. Explain
Free Law Morality Occupational safety and health
Notably‚ we cannot discuss ethics without including the concept of morals and rules. The creation of morals and rules that govern our everyday decisions shape our ethics. However these three principles often come into conflict with each other due to specific case studies where the line of right or wrong is often blurred. There is often no right or wrong answer when it comes to certain situations; in other cases there may be a definite right and wrong. Sometimes it is difficult to come to an ethical
Premium Ethics Morality Business ethics
Waddock’s analysis. b. The average level of moral reasoning for the Danish auditors in the study was a p-scoreof 35.48‚ which corresponds to a conventional level of moral reasoning. However‚about 37 percent of auditors in the study were in the pre-conventional moral reasoninggroup. Auditors in the pre-conventional group are at moral level are characterized bythe phrases “doing what you are told” and “let’s make a deal”. Auditors in theconventional group are at a moral level characterized by the phrases “be
Premium Morality Ethics Moral psychology
follows the notion that there is a singular moral standard that people should abide by. This is a dogmatic approach to ethics. Absolutism permits ethical rules to be assessed critically. It is rational because people are treated equally as the rules are identical for all. According to an absolute there is no need to have different rules for different people. The downside
Premium Morality Ethics Relativism
wrong things‚ yet no one has a complete understanding for what is actually morally right and wrong. He then talks about “Moral Faculty” and two different views or opinions on the subject. Mill states in his text that “Our moral faculty‚ according to all those of its interpreters who are entitled to the name of thinkers‚ supplies us only with the general principles of moral judgments; it is a branch of our reason‚ not of our sensitive faculty; and must be looked to for the abstract doctrines of
Premium Morality Ethics Moral absolutism
Björnsson’s research interests fall into moral psychology and moral responsibility. He works on the unification and accounts of moral correctness as well as the psychological effectiveness of manipulation and how the ignorance of others can justify the rightness of possible evil. There are many attributes that conceal the faithfulness of why manipulation is necessary to survive and why it is despicably wicked. The guiding inspiration has been to start with an empirically adequate account of why attributions
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy
market. Different ethical perspectives guide ethical decision making in the right direction‚ wrong direction‚ and walking a fine line direction. Some companies use ethical decision making as a tool to keep their company out of trouble by using proper moral judgment. While other companies could care less if they are being ethical. The ones with unethical practices will do anything to make a dollar. There are also companies that walk a fine line when it comes to sweatshops. They usually know what regulations
Premium Ethics Morality Sweatshop
Aristotle’s beliefs are somewhat different than a moral relativists. Aristotle believed that a good life is a happy life‚ and that happiness and virtue are directly related. Virtue is the ultimate goal that everyone should strive for. If what makes you happy is good and moral‚ then it is acceptable to impose your lifestyle on other people. Aristotle would disagree with the moral relativists standpoint because a good life should make anyone happy‚ while moral relativists believe each persons happiness can
Premium Ethics Relativism Morality
This means that he or she supports of the thing‚ or disapproves of it‚ and not anything more. There is furthermore the basic idea of ethical subjectivism‚ and it is open to objection and approval as well. Simple subjectivism cannot be added up for a moral disagreement. For example‚ if somebody has confidence in that being gay is acceptable and somebody else does not have the confidence in that being gay is acceptable. Then‚ you must correspondingly consider a theory that states to some degree about
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Euthyphro is one of Plato’s earliest dialogues of Socrates and Euthyphro. The dialogue took place just before Socrates’ trial in 399 BC between Socrates and Euthyphro – a man of strong religious belief. When Socrates found out that Euthyphro is laying a charge against his father for being impious‚ he then questions Euthyphro the meaning of piety and impiety as he is unsure himself; because he is confused as to why he is facing a charge for being impious. Euthyphro suggests four definitions of what
Premium Ethics Morality Euthyphro