Rammy Mekhilef Mr. Drake H Lang and Comp April 20th‚ 2009 Animal Testing for Research ’ Pro side The death of one dog vs. saving the life of many diabetic humans. Which would you pick? Diabetes caused many deaths before insulin was discovered from the pancreas of a dog. After insulin was discovered‚ it could be injected into the bloodstream to keep the insulin level high. Along with this‚ much of our medicinal discoveries are experimented on different types of animals. Many people support the
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Pain
SHOULD WE REPLACE ANIMAL TESTING IN THE MEDICAL FIELD WITH ALTERNATIVE METHODS? Affirmative Arguments: 1. Their poor reliability (more reliable alternatives) 2. Unnecessary cruelty to animals (causing controversy) Reliability/Alternatives Reliability Cigarettes were considered safe because smoking-related cancer is almost impossible to reproduce in non-human animals. The primary purpose of medical research is to promote human health‚ and the most direct research methods focus on the study of
Premium Animal testing Animal rights
Animal testing: Because people don’t contribute their own lives for testing scientists then move to something not as useful for the world like mice‚ rats‚ and other animals. So we then destroy their lives instead of ours‚ and use them for our own purpose. Animal testing involves extreme pain for the animals. These animals are fully conscious and never given any pain relief. So when tests fail they have to suffer a painful death. The purpose of animal testing is known to everyone because it has been
Premium Animal rights Animal testing Testing cosmetics on animals
animal protection and animal activist groups. Using animals for drug testing has become an important part of scientific experiments but it has also led to the deaths of millions of animals. When animal testing goes wrong‚ it can harm the users whom it is supposedly benefiting. The use of animal testing should be abandoned because it does not predict accurate results in human beings‚ it kills animals‚ and there are alternate testing methods that exist which do not involve the use of animals. The differences
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
should be generated for every path. • For each predicate generate Test Cases. • Test Date range should be within the range of the loop. • Boundary value should be checked properly. 2.6 User Documentation There will be an offline of White Box Testing technique and Test Case Generation manual‚ and floating tooltips will be employed in the application. 2.7 Assumptions • Adequate hardware and software resources will be available. • Adequate manpower will be available. • Adequate skills will
Premium Computer program Software testing Scientific method
What is Hypothesis Testing? A statistical hypothesis is an assumption about a population parameter. This assumption may or may not be true. Hypothesis testing refers to the formal procedures used by statisticians to accept or reject statistical hypotheses. Statistical Hypotheses Null hypothesis. The null hypothesis‚ denoted by H0‚ is usually the hypothesis that sample observations result purely from chance. Alternative hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis‚ denoted by H1 or Ha‚ is the hypothesis
Premium Statistical hypothesis testing Statistics Null hypothesis
medicine are occurring and we can give thanks to animal testing for being the reason for many of them. Animal testing can be essential to providing important information needed to move forward with experiments and new medicine. While some believe that animal testing is wrong‚ it is necessary‚ as long as the animals are treated with care‚ because it provides beneficial insight into humans‚ and it could lead to cures for certain illnesses. Medical testing on animals provides valuable insight for humans.
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Medical research
and be curious‚ do animal testing necessary? With reference to current issues on animal rights and academic studies on animal testing‚ I will illustrate that all animal testing should not be banned‚ they are crucial and significant to the medical development and can by no means substitute by other experimental methods. I will further explain that human have greater intrinsic value than animal‚ socially and religiously‚ they do not have the same rights. Firstly‚ animal testing has overwhelming contribution
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Human
Animal Testing is Necessary “Animal research and testing has played a part in almost every medical breakthrough of the last century. It has saved hundreds of millions of lives worldwide.” Joan Ryan. When most people think of animal testing‚ they usually think about injured‚ blinded animals that they have seen in pictures online or on TV. After seeing just a few of those images‚ most people are quick to side with banning animal testing. However what most people do not realize is how much animal
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Medical research
innovative ways to change. There are even laws and bans to help stop animal testing‚ but the effects of the test during and after are unbearable to think about for anyone or anything. Animal testing should be stopped. There are plenty of alternatives‚ laws and bans that should be better enforced‚ and that testing on animals is inhumane and immoral. There are more efficient‚ inexpensive‚ and
Premium Animal testing Testing cosmetics on animals Human