Is Nike Worth the Buy? Thomas Senyard Issue It has been a week since Nike’s analyst meeting in which management unveiled a plan to revitalize the company. Kimi Ford wonders‚ is Nike a good buy for her mutual fund? Background Nike’s recent market share has been declining. The new strategy that management introduced plans to develop a better mid-priced shoe‚ to push their apparel line and to put more effort into expense control. Lehman Brothers say that Nike is a strong buy‚ but UBS
Premium Security Mutual fund Stock market
M1 – Cadburys and Topshop are both businesses that strive to produce effective marketing techniques in order to sell their products. Although both have a wide range of consumers‚ their marketing techniques are both slightly similar and very different. Differences Cadburys offer mass production of every individual product on offer in over 1‚000 stores. However Topshop offer limited amounts of each product in designated Topshop stores and online. Cadburys offer prizes with special chocolate
Premium Marketing Advertising Chocolate
Graduate School of Business Administration University Version 2.0 of Virginia UVA-F-1353 Version 2.0 Nike‚ Inc.: Cost of Capital On July 5‚ 2001‚ Kimi Ford‚ a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group‚ a mutual fund management firm‚ pored over analyst write-ups of Nike‚ Inc.‚ the athletic shoe manufacturer. Nike’s share price had declined significantly from the start of the year. Kimi was considering buying some shares for the fund she managed‚ the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund‚ which invested mostly in
Premium Balance sheet Revenue Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
October 12‚ 2000 Dear Sir / Madam Through this letter I would like to apply for the post Consultant "Human Resources" (Ref. 61st / TX)‚ published in "24 Hours" and "Work". Your announcement provoked my interest because it is an area where I plan to unfold. I have two years experience in consulting in human resources and recruitment. During this time‚ in addition to my professional knowledge and skills I have gained experience in working with clients from various fields. Develop the ability
Premium Management Learning Quality control
Introduction This paper is a based on a case study of Nike. The paper will be discussing legal and ethical analysis and how the impact the operational/ ethical issues of the organization‚ the paper shall also be discussing the contribution factors and how the company’s corporate culture may have helped to minimize the unethical behavior or actually contributed to/caused the unethical behavior. The paper is also going to provide ethical decision factors‚ which are going to address or going to be
Premium Ethics
Nike Case – Spreading out to stay together 1. When Nike CEO Phil Knight stepped down and handed his job to Bill Perez‚ he stayed on as chairman of the board. In what ways could Knight’s continued presence on the board have created an informal structure that prevented Perez from achieving full and complete leadershipof Nike? Answer: Informal structures are the shadow organization that represents the actualworking and communication relationships that may not resemble the formal organizationalchart
Premium Phil Knight Organization
GYAAN KOSH TERM 1 Learning and Development Council‚ CAC Managerial Economics This document covers the basic concepts of Managerial Economics covered in Term 1. The document only summarizes the main concepts and is not intended to be an instructive material on the subject. Gyaan Kosh Term 1 MGEC Learning & Development Council‚ CAC Opportunity cost: Taken into account for economic decisions. Opportunity Cost is the “next best” or “alternative” benefit from an investment Sunk costs:
Premium Consumer theory Supply and demand Economics
‘unethical’ by media who construe this view to consumers. Such allegations can and will have damaging effects with Nike having been taken to court already in the past. 2. Would the use of third-party independent contractors insulate MNCs from being attacked? Would that practice offer MNCs a good defensive shield against charges of abuse of “their employees”? • Not necessarily‚ as Nike will be using labour which is just managed by another party. They would just be shifting the blame of abusing “their
Premium Business ethics Ethics Corporate social responsibility
In order to understand the Nike system’s effectiveness in defending the US‚ the hostile actions and aerial strength of the USSR must be put into context. The main reason for the creation of the Nike missile system was to defend and deter the rapid technological advances of the USSR. After World War II‚ the USSR was able to acquire German scientists that had been working on the infamous V-2 rockets‚ as well as nuclear research. In addition‚ the USSR was also able to acquire some of the US’s bombers
Premium World War II Nuclear weapon Cold War
were good‚ I think that there were some that she could have used different numbers and rates to come up with more accurate numbers. WACC=(E/(D+E)) Ke + (D/(D+E)) Kd (1-t) 2. If you do not agree with Cohen’s analysis‚ calculate your own WACC for Nike and be prepared to justify your assumptions Cost of debt-based on yield to maturity PMT= 100(.0675)=6.75 N= 20 (2)=40 FV= 100 PV= 95.6 I/Y= computed on calculator=7.0832(semiannually) 7.0832(2)=14.166% annually COST OF EQUITY Cost of
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Investment Arithmetic mean