Mountain Man Brewing Company Case Analysis Mountain Man Brewing Company does not want to go another year with revenue lost from Mountain Man Lager. By adding a light beer to the product line it could gain loyalty from a younger crowd and attract more then just the workingman. At the same time he does not want to lose the brand equality that has taken years to create. He is also faced with solid monopolies in the beer world that make it hard to keep up. Chris is faced with a hard decision
Premium Baby boomer Beer Brewing
Mountain Man Brewing Company (MMBC) was found in 1925 as a family run business and “Mountain Man Lager” is its core product. MMBC was rated as “Best Beer in West Virginia” for years and was selected as “America’s Championship Lager” at the American Beer Championship. MMBC relied on his history and status as independent‚ family-owned brewery to create an aura of authenticity and to position the beer with its core drinkers – blue-collar‚ middle-to-lower income men over age 45. Because of the product
Premium Beer Brand Brand management
Rochester Institute of Technology | Mountain Man Brewing Company: Bringing the Brand to Light | Advanced Corporate Financial Planning | Professor Testa 1/23/2012 | | | Objective Complete a NPV analysis to see if Mountain Man Brewing Company should implement Mountain Man Light to its existing product lines: * SWOT Analysis on Mountain Man Lager * NPV analysis for Mountain Man Lager * NPV analysis for Mountain Man Light * NPV analysis on whole company * Strategic Options
Premium Revenue Marketing
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Mountain Man Brewing Company | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Financial Projections | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | Assumptions | | | | | | | | | | | Revenues from MM beer | $50‚440‚000.00
Premium Management Economics Term
Situation Analysis A) Internal environment General characteristics: Mountain Man Lager is a family owned brewing company‚ and is known as West Virginia’s beer. Change of CEO‚ as the founder and president Oscar Prangel retires‚ leaving the company to his son Chris Prangel. Due to changes in beer drinker’s preferences‚ the company is experiencing a decline in sales for the first time in the company’s history. Mountain Man’s 2005 revenues are down by 2% relative to the prior year‚ while
Premium Marketing Beer
Business Model Mountain Man Brewing Company was a family-owned business which owned a quality beer called Mountain Man Lager. As shown in Exhibit 1‚ the Mountain Man Lager was well known as working man’s beer. Its quality taste with bitter flavor and high alcohol content were the value propositions for the products. And the key resources for these features were the special recipe and a meticulous selection of barley. Also the main customer segment for the Lager was blue collar most of whom were
Premium Beer Marketing
A strong brand 6 benefits of a strong brand… …and the 4Cs of brand management © 2005 Clarity Marketing Ltd www.clarity-in-communication.com 1 Branding – can it really work for the small business? If you think of a brand‚ what comes to mind? CocaCola‚ Virgin‚ Hertz‚ Orange? It’s easy to think of branding as being for the big boys with big bucks. But that’s not to say that only large corporates can play the branding game. Small companies really should be able to build strong brands too
Premium Brand Brand management
Dickinson BUS 656 Case Write up #2 Mountain Man Brewing Company Problem Statement Mountain Man Lagers main customer is an older generation‚ blue-collar worker‚ which make up a larger percentage of the sales. In 2005 sales have dropped 2% relative to the prior fiscal year. The cause is from a stiffening competition‚ a market that is maturing and new products. All of these factors are stealing the customers from the Mountain Man Brewing Company (MMBC). The light beer market is starting to
Premium Beer Academic dishonesty
attractiveness of the light beer segment for Mountain Man Brewing Company using the three targeting criteria we discussed in class. The three targeting criteria for points of parity and differentiating are Potential‚ fit and defensibility. Potential means the firm’s ability to tap into market; Fit means the match between the market and the firm’s capabilities. And defensibility means how well company can define its position. Potential: Overall‚ the light beer segment has tremendous potential. In east central
Premium Marketing Beer Management
Mountain Man Light – To be or not to be? The problem: Should MMBC launch Mountain Man Light? Mountain Man brand image: Quality taste‚ competitive pricing‚ higher-than-average alcohol content‚ “working man’s beer”‚ regional loyalty‚ generations in the family business. Customer Base: 81% male‚ 19% female. The large majority of drinkers is between 45 and 54 at 32%. 47% make less than 49.9K/year. The mountain man brand has a loyal following. Why? Grass roots marketing. Off premise consumption. Effective
Premium Brand Marketing Beer