Utilitarian moral theories evaluate the moral worth of action on the basis of happiness that is produced by an action. Whatever produces the most happiness in the most people is the moral course of action. I will give the best arguments against Utilitarianism‚ and show in my own opinion‚ why I think they are wrong. The strongest counterargument against Utilitarianism would have to be Sterling Harwood’s eleven objections to the theory. Sterling Harwood states that even he does not accept all
Premium Utilitarianism Ethical egoism
kids no time to do any activities and play outside. Growing up I also had around the same schedule‚ after school I would get home and sit down and do homework before I can do anything else. In middle school I would have homework in at least half of my 8 classes a day and on top of that
Premium Homework English-language films Logic
Arguments of Dualism Dualism is the theory that mind and matter are two distinct things. The main argument for dualism is that facts about the objective external world of particles and fields of force‚ as revealed by modern physical science‚ are not facts about how things appear from any particular point of view‚ whereas facts about subjective experience are precisely about how things are from the point of view of individual conscious subjects. They have to be described in the first person as
Premium Mind Philosophy of mind Consciousness
It can be argued though‚ that we are not free unless we are able to choose between alternatives. A counter argument to this is that‚ so long as “I could have done otherwise” means “I could have done otherwise‚ but I didn’t want to”‚ then it was my own choice that prevented me from doing otherwise‚ and what I did was of my own free will. This classical compatibilist position is undermined by consideration of psychological factors such as mental disorders‚ delusions
Premium Free will Determinism Causality
In this paper I will explain Socrates’ agreement at 50 a-b of the Crito‚ and explain my reason why would not cause his fellow citizens harm by breaking the law. Specially I will show that people can actually create a positive. I will explain that Socrates argument and show how depends on how what the unjust causes. Then I will argue that this assumption is to be questioned under the fact that citizens are not necessarily affected by the law breakers‚ and that by doing something unjust can be moral
Premium Plato Law
II.Rationale Debate I choose debate as my example. Debate is a method of interactive and representational argument.Debate is commonly carried out .In debating there is a topic to discuss and decide on differences and defining how will they interact. Debate is a type of argument looking for truths‚ and a means of making and evaluating arguments that allows debaters to better understand their own and others positions. This sense of shared ideas toward the truth brings debaters closer together‚ even
Premium Debate
Wilde’s claims on disobedience can promote social progress is a valid argument. He felt like with disobedience world would progress forwardly with purpose. Over the years’ people had to disobey or rebel to get their way. With disobedience there is always consequences to it even if it’s for respectable reasons. John browns rebellion was for people to see blacks as equal and to put a stop to slavery. Many thought it was uncanny for a white to care about what happens to a blacks but its what’s right
Premium Black people African American White people
This essays focuses on Cleanthes’ argument from design in defence for Natural Religion. The Dialogues sets out the definition of Natural Religion. Our inquiry is about religious epistemology: how and whether we can know about God. The central claim is that through observation we can infer God’s existence and nature. Cleanthes argues that through the argument from design we can infer God’s nature (p. 53). Cleanthes’ strongest defences‚ I feel‚ are 1) Philos’ unsustainable scepticism‚ and 2) his "companions
Premium Logic God Universe
second chapter of Walden titled “Where I Lived and What I Lived For‚” Thoreau crafts an intricate argument which advocates for self-realization within every individual. The specific quote I chose from the excerpt struck me deeply as the rhetoric question that is produced at the beginning of it explains how I feel on most days as I give “so poor an account” of my day each night. Continually throughout my life‚ I have gone through the motions of a typical day with the structure presented by school and
Premium Education University High school
English 1201 Professor McGehee 10/22/2012 Cover Sheet a) Who is your audience? My audience applies to everyone in the US. My audience is very broad because my topic touches base on an issue that can or could potentially affect anyone directly or indirectly as well. b) How would you like your readers to describe the personality you present on the page? My personality is confident. I believe in my argument and feel strongly about it. c) What question does your paper answer? It answers the
Premium Police Police brutality Police officer