“Along the way and in 1987‚ these 2 house staffers will be taken before a grand jury for possible murder charges and while the grand jury will not charge them with murder‚ it will charge them with 38 counts of gross negligence &/or gross incompetence. Under New York law‚ the investigative body for these charges was the Hearing Committee of the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct and between April 1987 and January 1989‚ this committee will have conducted 30 hearings at which 33 witnesses
Premium Health care Health insurance Health economics
Thus‚ the negligence claim with this case failed on the reason that the Touche(defendant) owed no duty of care to Ultramares (plaintiff) because Ultramares was not a primary beneficiary of Touche’s professional audit. The court found that Touche was guilty of ordinary negligence but not fraud. Over the years the rule of Ultramares has been expanded in some cases to the point that the gross negligence noted in Ultramares case has been eliminated. Ultramares
Premium Securities Act of 1933 Accountant Profession
repose in trespass but not in negligence even if the claimant has suffered no damage. This shows its usefulness in protecting civil rights hence much of the law of trespass is the basis of a civil liberties today.
Premium Law Tort Criminal law
HI 5018 BUSINESS LAW Week 4 Application of Negligence to Business Chapter 9 Applications of Negligence to Business Chapter objectives On completion of this chapter‚ you should be able to: identify and discuss the application of the tort of negligence to the following: a) occupier’s liability b)strict liability c) negligent misstatements d)employer or vicarious liability e) breach of statutory duty f) criminal negligence HI 5018 BUSINESS LAW T2 2014 3 3 1 Chapter objectives On completion
Premium Law Tort law Tort
Law of Torts Assignment draft This paper shall examine the current position of the Rescuer under Irish law‚ and critically examine how this position has developed under common law and statutes. This development can draw many of its origins from the 2009 Law Reform Commission consultation paper which essentially outlined a framework for the drafting of legislation. Furthermore analysing case law and statue from our jurisdiction and abroad‚ which was applied in the only real substantive case in
Premium Tort Common law Law
Homicide – (Murder & Manslaughter) Homicide is the term for killing a human being unlawfully. There are two types of homicide‚ Murder and manslaughter. The actus reus is the same in any homicide; an unlawful act or omission that causes the death of another human being. The mens rea for murder is known as malice aforethought‚ which can either be express malice (an intention to kill) or implied malice (an intention to cause really serious injury with or without the foresight of causing death)
Premium Criminal law
where a person’s behaviour has unfairly caused someone else to suffer loss or harm. A person who suffers a tortious act is entitled to receive compensation for “damages”‚ usually money payment from the person or people responsible. The tort of negligence is a type of civil wrong where a contract does not exists between two parties and it is not a crime where punishment is the main objective to the offender. For example‚ trespass on private property or nuisance behaviour‚ these have no contract between
Premium Tort Law Tort law
Associate Professor ( 兼任教授) Barrister-at-law ( 大律師 ) DLS 2 BRIEF - Lecture 2 (A) Principles of Criminal Liability Chapters 2 and 4 of the Workbook and some additional information 2 Mens Rea consists of : 1. 2. 3. Intention Recklessness Gross Negligence The crime will specify the kind of mens rea required. 3 1 2014/10/3 (i) Intention How does the prosecution prove intention? There can be: (i) Direct proof; or (ii) Indirect proof. can be drawn from conduct of accused. Irresistible Inferences
Premium Criminal law
Negligent Tort Deaundra Chatman BUS670: Legal Environment (MFH1446A) Instructor: Leah Westerman Date: January 15‚ 2015 Negligent Tort Manufacturing industries are in the business of making products for the consumer industry‚ products that supposed to be sustainable and have the potential to improve the lives of the people using them. In most cases‚ they get it right; they make a product that does not have any problems when it comes to using it. However‚ in some situations‚ there happens
Premium Law Tort Tort law
Titanic Case Analysis Estate of Hans Jensen vs. The White Star Line Facts: The White Star Line was owner of the Titanic‚ which was the largest and most luxurious ship in the world at the time. On April 10th‚ 1912‚ the Titanic left from Southampton‚ England with 2‚227 passengers aboard bound for New York City. On April 14th‚ the ship struck an iceberg off the coast of Newfoundland and sank about 2 ½ hours later. Passengers‚ mostly women and children‚ were loaded into lifeboats‚ however only 705
Premium RMS Titanic Tort White Star Line