M/s ZYCUS INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED a company registered under the Companies Act 1956 and having its office at Plot no. GJ.07‚ SEEPZ++‚ SEEPZ SEZ‚ Andheri (E)‚ Mumbai – 400 096 hereinafter referred to as the “ZYCUS” The terms ZYCUS INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED and the Vendor wherever the context admits‚ unless repugnant to the meaning hereof‚ shall always mean and include their respective authorized employees‚ agents‚ successors in business and permitted assigns. WHEREAS The vendor has represented
Premium Water Mineral water Desalination
QUICK FACTS DUTY OF CARE & NEGLIGENCE Both terms used in COMMON LAW. Duty of Care Exists between two individuals where there is an obligation on one party not to harm the other Duty is personal - owed by one individual to another individual e.g. an employer owes a DOC to each one of his employees There are several examples of where there is a recognised DOC - Employer/Employee; Doctor/Patient; Parent/Child; Teacher/Pupil The standard of care which must be exercised by an employer is
Premium Tort Law Tort law
Calculus of Negligence 4 Who is the Reasonable Person? 9 Causation 13 Factual Causation under the Common Law 13 Factual Causation under Statute 16 Novus Actus Interveniens 18 Successive Causes 20 Exceptional Cases 21 Remoteness 24 Foreseeability of Damage 24 Kind of Injury and Manner of its Occurrence 25 Eggshell Skull Rule 26 Concurrent Liability 28 Vicarious Liability 28 Non-delegable Duty 33 Proportionate Liability 35 Breach of Statutory Duty 38 Defences to Negligence 42 Contributory
Premium Negligence Tort law Common law
CHILD AND MARY SMITH N/O/F : Plaintiff‚ : J. D. OF CONNECTICUT v. : AT NEW HAMSHIRE OD FAMILY CAMPGROUND‚ INC. : ROBERT TUTTLE : SUSAN TUTTLE : Defendants. : August 24‚ 2013 COMPLAINT COUNT ONE – NEGLIGENCE (OD Family Campground) 1. The Plaintiff‚ Shayla Smith a minor child by and through Mary Smith N/O/F‚ (Plaintiff)‚ is a resident of New Hartford‚ Connecticut. 2. Upon information and belief‚ Defendant‚ Owen and Dolly Jones Operate the OD
Premium Complaint Swimming pool Plaintiff
Consumer‚ Medical Profession and Negligence: Analysis Submitted by Ananya Pratap Singh Division-C Roll No.- 36 Class- 2011-2016 of Symbiosis Law School‚ NOIDA Symbiosis International University‚ PUNE In February‚ 2012 Under the guidance of Dr. Chandrashekhar J. Rawandale Director Symbiosis Law School‚ Noida C E R T I F I C A T E The project entitled “Consumer‚ Medical Profession and Negligence: Analysis“ submitted to the Symbiosis Law School‚ NOIDA for Law of Torts‚ MV Accident
Premium Medicine Negligence Duty of care
Chapter 2 Negligence: basic principles Contents Introduction 13 2.1 2.2 2.3 Structure of the tort 13 Organisation of the chapters 14 Policy questions 14 Introduction Negligence is the most important modern tort: its study should occupy about half the course. It is important because of the great volume of reported cases and because it is founded on a principle of wide and general application. This chapter explains the basic structure of the tort and describes the organisation of the material in
Premium Negligence Tort Tort law
References: Bradford‚ R. W.‚ Duncan‚ P. J.‚ & Tarcy‚ B. (2000). Simplified Strategic Planning. Chandler House Press. Larson‚ A. (2003‚ October). Negligence and tort law. Retrieved August 21‚ 2012‚ from ExpertLaw: http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/negligence.html
Premium Contract Customer Customer service
THE ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE PART IV-B- EXTRAORDINARY PUBLISHED BY ATHORITY HYDEARBAD‚ THURSDAY‚ APRIL 20‚ 1989 ANDHRA PRADESH ACTS‚ ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS. ETC. The following Act of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly received the assent of the Governor on the 19th April‚ 1989 in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette for general information:ACT NO. 9 OF 1989 An Act to authorise the Director of State Audit to Audit the Accounts relating to Local Authorities or other Authorities and for matters connected
Premium Andhra Pradesh
1. If a CPA recklessly departs from the standards of due care when conducting an audit‚ she or he will be liable to unknown third parties based on a. strict liability c. negligence b. gross negligence d. breach of contract 2. Under the common law‚ which of the following statements most accurately reflects the liability of a CPA who fraudulently gives an opinion on an audit of a client’s financial statements? c. The CPA is liable only to third parties in privity of contract
Premium Internal control Financial audit Auditing
Tort Law Reading Notes Week 1 Mon Sep 8 Damages pp697-729 - aim of damages: restore plaintiff to position he would have been had the wrong not occurred o as this is impossible in cases of personal injury‚ monetary compensation is used o total amount is the amount that will release the target amount over the given span of years - assessment is a matter if calculation‚ not impression (SCC 1978) - 3 probs: o 1) what kinds of items must a defendant compensate
Premium Tort