Iqra University Gulshan Campus M. Phil: Strategic HRM Presentation Topic: Southwest Airlines: A Case Study Linking Employee Needs Satisfaction and Organizational Capabilities to Competitive Advantage written by Roger Hallowell Reference: Human Resource Management‚ 1996‚ Vol. 35(4)‚ p. 513-534 Presented by: M. Shahnawaz Adil Dated: Tuesday‚ March 01‚ 2011 Course Facilitator: Mr. Ahsan Durrani Abstract (as written by Roger Hallowell): This article analyzes the sources of Southwest Airlines’
Premium Southwest Airlines Airline Boeing 737
BP Disaster at Sea In 2010 the nation was dealt the worst oil spill in the history of the USA‚ the BP oil rig Deep water horizon in the Gulf of Mexico. This major catastrophe destroyed some people‚ millions of aquatic wildlife‚ birds and the reputation of BP all in one fatal event. What caused this mind blowing disaster to happen? We will take a look
Premium Exxon Valdez oil spill Petroleum Oil spill
ISSUES Parties: Frank and Belinda; Marie; Douglas Pty Ltd; Black; Brown & Co Issue 1: Does any of those parties mentioned above have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? If so‚ are they liable for a negligent misstatement for the loss of Frank and Belinda? Sub Issue 1.1: Does Marie have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? Sub Issue 1.2: Does Douglas Pty Ltd have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? Sub Issue 1.3: Does Black have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? Sub Issue 1.4: Does Brown
Premium Corporation Law Common law
08th October 2008 Tort-Obligations II Tutorial 1 1. What is Tort law for? ▪The law of tort- The word derives from the French for ‘Wrong’. ▪ The civil action for damages aims at compensation as opposed to criminal prosecution. Restoring the status quo. ▪Appeasement- the object of early law is to prevent disruption of society by disputes arising from the infliction of injury. The victim’s vengeance is bought off by compensation‚ which gives him satisfaction in 2 ways; he is comforted to receive
Premium Tort Negligence Law
shall perform any task assigned to me with care and diligence. 4. That I shall be held liable for any damage or destruction of property or injury on the third person which may happen during the course of my training caused by my unintentional or negligent acts. 5. That I will receive no remuneration and incentives of any form which only regular employees are entitled to. Signed this 9th day of April‚ 2014‚ at Tagum City‚ Davao del Norte‚ Philippines. CRYSTAL FAYE M. SUMATRA
Premium Provinces of the Philippines Davao Region
The defendant did not ensure the entrance to the pool was closed * As a result of the defendant’s breach of duty‚ the plaintiff suffered injuries. The defence will prove on the balance of probabilities that the Defendant‚ Dr Bridges was not negligent and did up hold her Duty of Care as a responsible adult and parent. She acted with forethought and checked the safety of the guests under her supervision on numerous occasions. Thus stating the incident did not occur at the fault of the defendant
Premium Tort Negligence Law
If you’ve suffered a catastrophic injury for which another person or organization can be found liable‚ you may want to contact an accident injury attorney to determine whether you should pursue an injury claim. But how can you determine whether another party might be held liable? Polinsky Law Group LLC‚ a Hartford law firm with over 30 years of experience in personal injury law‚ shares a few tips to determine whether you can file a catastrophic injury case under Connecticut law. How Do I Know If
Premium Tort Law Tort law
Compare and contrast the influences of legislation‚ legal factors and regulatory bodies on health and safety in sport How Fire safety of places of sport act (1987) has affected sports in England: This legislation has affected sports in England by making sports ground over all more safe‚ for example they have made more fire exits‚ and this will allow more people to evacuate in the occurrence of a fire. There is less chances of fires in stadiums now as they are now not made up of wood‚ the stands are
Free Players Law American football
defect. While it had not manufactured the wheels themselves‚ Buick was responsible for the final product that made it to consumers since it was Buick’s responsibility to test and inspect the wheels to ensure that they were safe and therefore‚ is negligent. 1. The court held Buick liable in tort for negligence in manufacturing a product with a danger. Buick argued that it should not be liable because it did not make the wheels. Why not make the injured party sue the producer of the defective part
Premium Tort Duty of care Manufacturing
Lec 4 Chap 29 United domains Corp v Brian Pty Ltd(p200): Was the agreement a joint venture or partnership? Decision: High court held that the parties were in a partnership; hence United Domain was entitled to share in profit. Canny Gabrial Castle v Volume Sales(p200): Canny Gabrial argued that the 2 companies were joint ventures Decision: Agreement was partnership Polkinghorne v Holland(p205): Was the giving of financial advice outside the ordinary business of the law firm‚ such that
Premium Contract