broken-down definition of the term and how it affects the term that we know today. Taking from another paper Frankfurt deduces that bullshit has four main goals in its use‚ those being; an intention to deceive‚ lying‚ a category of speech and the misrepresentation
Premium Truth Logic Lie
American Popular Culture as an Instrument of Racial Oppression The cultural images produced by the media serve to further oppress racialized groups in America and form national psyches which allow America’s institutionalized racism to prosper. Images proposed by the media and popular culture have made claims about all different racialized groups in America. The media has been instrumental in perpetuating ideas about the black male perp‚ the black male buffoon‚ all black Americans since the days
Premium Race African American Black people
Gardiner and H J Heinz Company Australia Ltd brought negligence suits against Marien in the District Court of NSW [8]-[9]. On 31 January 2013‚ Delaney DCJ found that Marien had been negligent and awarded Gardiner damages of $191‚865.07 [3]‚ [23]. In Heinz’ claim against Marien‚ Delaney DCJ again found Marien to be negligent and awarded Heinz damages of $58‚650.62. Marien appealed and both Gardiner and Heinz cross-appealed to the New South Wales Supreme Court of Appeal‚ which handed down its decision
Free Common law Law Tort
well as for committing negligent homicide. Frankenstein may be proven guilty of murder through the the elements of the mens rea and actus reus‚ whereas his disobedience of “The Prometheus Article” may be condemned by the three basic laws of negligence‚ known by many as the “Three Feasance Sisters”. The prosecution demands Victor to serve a four-life sentence with a “15 years to life” possibility
Premium Frankenstein Murder Victor Frankenstein
misconduct for an attorney is that “commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty‚ trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects”. An attorney could not “engage in conduct involving dishonesty‚ fraud‚ deceit or misrepresentation”. In the case of DeYoung and Ruggerio‚ Ruggerio‚ as an attorney of DeYoung‚ lied DeYoung to steal her children’s money from an inheritance. Ruggerio deposited $300000 of inheritance to his account and began to use the funds in his real estate
Premium Deception
liability/non-delegable duties 3 2 Duty of care 5 2.1 Immunities 5 2.2 Omissions/failure to control third party 6 2.3 Atypical Plaintiffs 6 2.4 Unborn Child 6 2.5 Mental Harm/Nervous Shock 7 2.6 Statutory Authorities 8 2.7 Pure Economic Loss/Negligent Misstatement 11 3 Breach of Duty 12 3.1 Section 5C 12 3.2 Obvious risks 12 4 Causation 13 4.1 Res ipsa loquitur 13 4.2 Novus actus interveniens 13 4.3 Causation in medical “failure to warn” cases 14 4.4 Multiple causes of injury/death 14
Premium Tort law Tort Negligence
number of bills to regulate use of cell phones on the road have been introduced in state legislatures‚ and the time has come to push for their passage. Regulation is needed because drivers using phones are seriously impaired and because laws on negligent and reckless driving are not sufficient to punish offenders. No one can deny that cell phones have caused traffic deaths and injuries. Cell phones were implicated in three fatal accidents in November 1999 alone. Early in November‚ two-year-old
Premium Mobile phone Traffic collision
that statements made are false‚ whereas the victim believes them to be true. A victim ’s property must be given to the accused relying on the misrepresentation and must be to the detriment of the victim and the benefit of the accused. Merriam Webster ’s Dictionary of Law defines larceny by trick as "larceny of property obtained by the use of misrepresentation esp. in getting an owner to hand over something in the belief that it is for temporary purposes" (Webster‚ 1996). These two crimes sound the
Premium Deception Law Lie
evaluated on a principled basis by starting with an analysis of negligence manslaughter‚ followed by an evaluation of reckless manslaughter‚ to end with a critique of unlawful act manslaughter. Although true negligent manslaughter mainly concerns professionals who are somehow negligent in the performance of their duties‚ the principles of the offense are normally employed to determine the existence of a duty of care. This means if A has caused the death of B by alleged negligence‚ then‚ in order
Premium Death Euthanasia Suicide
others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (9th ed. 2009) Analysis: Samantha is not able to prove that the grocery store had any knowledge of the hazardous substance on the floor; therefore‚ the grocery store was not negligent in its duty to the customer and cannot be held liable for Samantha’s injuries. Conclusion: It is not likely that Samantha will be awarded damages for her injuries because she cannot show proof that the grocery store had any knowledge of the
Premium Tort Law Reasonable person