factual-inductive style has persuasive appeals made to logic (e.g. typical in North American negotiations)‚ the axiomaticdeductive style appeals to ideals (e.g. typical in the former USSR) and the affective-intuitive style focuses on emotional appeals (e.g. typical in Arab countries). Other studies have shown that persuasive tactics are consistent across countries‚ such as the use of aggressive tactics present in US negotiation behavior There are essentially two strategies to bargaining: representational and
Premium Negotiation
------------------------------------------------- Negotiation Planning Worksheet What type of agreement do you hope to accomplish through the negotiation? A win-win solution would be best for both parties! What would you consider to be the best result? As Senior Sales Person for Jones Stamping‚ it would be great to come to an agreement of at least $30.25 per piece‚ with altered packing specifications to satisfy our operations manager. What must you have? a) A clear definition of
Premium Negotiation Contract Bargaining
the seller in the other hand wants profit from us as the buyers. So I considered this as a distributive bargaining zero-sum negotiation where both of us did not get any of what we want‚ or in the other hand let’s say if they agree to negotiate about the price but they did not have many choice but to agree in the price that I offer to them‚ this is a win-lose negotiation where one party’s gain is the other party’s loss. SKILL3.2: There are a few basic step that I need to do to determine or
Premium Best alternative to a negotiated agreement Contract Economics terminology
WALMART NEGOTIATION CASE: Walmart the world’s largest retailer‚ sold $315 billion worth of goods in 2006. With its single-minded focus on "EDLP" (everyday low prices) and the power to make or break suppliers‚ a partnership with Wal-Mart is either the Holy Grail or the kiss of death‚ depending on one’s perspective. There are numerous media accounts of the corporate monolith riding its suppliers into the ground. But what about those who manage to survive‚ and thrive‚ while dealing with the classic
Premium Negotiation
Reflection Journal: TEXOIL CASE Summer 2015 For the Texoil negotiation‚ I was assigned the role of the Service Station Owner. As such‚ my main objective was to sell the station and get the best possible agreement. My BATNA was $518‚000‚ which accounted the present and the next two years expenses ($478‚000) plus half of the year salary upon return from the trip ($35‚000). My asking price was 650‚000 explaining to Texoil that the market price was around $800‚000. The benchmark was the cost of constructing
Premium Contract Negotiation Marketing
Jewels Equipment Manufactures 1. a. In negotiation with condor‚ what is Jewels BATNA? A. Jewels BATNA in this case is to buy Z1 CPU from Beta‚ because Z1 are more effective than Z2 and they will save $5 per unit so the total cost of this Z1 units at the end instead of being $38 will be $33. This is $2 dollars cheaper than buying Z2 at $35 per unit. b. In negotiation with condor‚ what is Jewel’s reservation price‚ i.e.‚ the most it will pay for Condor’s Z2 CPU? B. Their reservation price should
Premium Risk Best alternative to a negotiated agreement Negotiation
WEF_Metals and Mining Scenarios 15.1.2010 17:32 Page 1 Mining & Metals Scenarios to 2030 WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM in collaboration with the INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION and MCKINSEY & COMPANY WEF_Metals and Mining Scenarios 15.1.2010 17:32 Page 2 Description Green Trade Alliance Rebased Globalism Resource Security Geo-economic landscape In 2030‚ the world is divided and countries are defined economically by whether or not they belong to the Green Trade Alliance (GTA)‚ formed in
Premium Economic growth Strategic management Economics
Decide Worksheet Name: IFE AKANMU Course Section: Negotiation Skills Date: 02/12/2014 Questions: 1. What is the appropriate negotiation strategy that would be most advantageous for Sharon and Jim in this scenario‚ distributive or integrative bargaining? What are the factors that should be considered in making this determination? Integrative bargaining (also called "interest-based bargaining‚" "win-win bargaining") is a negotiation strategy in which parties collaborate to find a "win-win"
Premium Negotiation Dispute resolution Contract
compensation. Tina believes she has rights as an employee not to be discriminated against because she feels she is being singled out when it comes to rudeness with customers. Joe could improve this situation by using an interest based or integrative negotiation approach. Tina stated that she was having family problems‚ but would not go into any details. Joe could have gently persuaded her to give some information in order to determine if indeed there was an underlying cause to her rudeness and anger
Premium Law Discrimination Dispute resolution
Case Many times‚ the process of collective bargaining agreement (CBA) negotiations is referred to as being “an art”. Although it is guided by various labor laws and there are multitudes of theories that claim to have established best practices in the field‚ every negotiation simply has too many unique variables to consider to ever be approached as anything more than an art. Even in the short span in which new negotiations are required to reach an updated contract‚ too many changing factors on both
Premium Negotiation Collective bargaining