HELMER et al. v. RUMARSON TECHNOLOGIES‚ INC. (two cases) Court of Appeals of Georgia‚ 2000. 245 Ga. App. 598‚ 538 S.E.2d 504 FACTS Rumarson Technologies‚ Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24‚965 owed to it by Event Marketing‚ Inc. (EMI) when EMI’s check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI’s corporate account‚ and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower
Premium Appeal Cheque Court
Background Nestlé Company had started off from a single man ’s idea‚ and developed into a giant corporation. In 1866 Henri Nestlé‚ a pharmacist‚ developed a milk food formula for infants who were unable to tolerate their mother milk (Nestle.com). His product became a success‚ and it created a demand throughout Europe. As Nestlé’s popularity grew more businesses wanted to merge and become partners with Henri Nestlé ’s business. From 1866 to 1947 the Nestlé Company had gone through several name changes
Premium Strategic management Developed country Milk
SWOT Analysis Essay on Nestlé 1 SWOT Analysis Essay on Nestlé Draft 1 Zehua Qiu Jet CS1 COB Jessy Hendrickx April 18‚2013 SWOT Analysis Essay on Nestlé 2 Introduction According to the Nestlé official website‚ Nestlé‚ which was founded in 1866‚ is one of the biggest food companies in the world. It provides good quality food for people of all age
Premium Brand Brand management Milk
Nestle in China Research Report 1. objective Our objective is to provide good-tasting foods and beverages‚ as well as services‚ bring nutrition‚ health and wellness to Chinese consumers. 2. description of the company’s Nestlé is the largest consumer packaged goods’ company in the world‚ founded and headquartered in Switzerland. Nestlé originated in a 1905 merger of the Anglo-Swiss Milk Company‚ which was established in 1866 by brothers George Page and Charles Page‚ and the Farine Lactée Henri
Premium Coffee Milk Chocolate
marketing Final Project Done by: Mohammad Awji Nouf El Sabbagh Ayman Hallal Sara Khamis Moufid Assi Submitted to: Dr. Rifaat Abdullah Spring: 2009-2010 OUTLINE I. Introduction about Pizza Hut A. Type of industry B. Size of the business C. Historical information about Pizza Hut 1. Market Share 2. Profits 3. Turnover Rate 4. Suppliers‚ Customers & Competitors II. Problem & Purpose of the Research III. Exploratory Research(Identify
Premium Pizza Hut Pizza
INTRODUCTION Nestle It is the world’s number one food company. The world leader in soluble coffee‚ mineral water‚ dairy and infant nutrition‚ and proactive in any other categories. The best brands of the organisation comprised of: Nescafe‚ Perrier‚ Nestle and Buitoni amidst others. To put in some numbers: The net benefit of the company was $3.4 billion and an annual sales of $48.2 billion. The global market share of the company in foods and beverages industry is 1.4% and processes and branded
Premium Legal entities Fundamental analysis Financial markets
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY INTRODUCTION ON NESTLE Nestlé S.A. is a Swiss multinational food and beverage company headquartered in Vevey‚ Switzerland. It is the largest food company in the world measured by revenues. Nestlé’s products include baby food‚ bottled water‚ breakfast cereals‚ coffee‚ confectionery‚ dairy products‚ ice cream‚ pet foods‚ and snacks. 29 of Nestlé’s brands have annual sales of over 1 billion Swiss francs (about $ 1.1 billion)‚[3][5] including Nespresso‚ Nescafé
Premium World War II Milk
The Private Movie Co.‚ Inc. v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al. 1. What are the facts? The Private Movie Company (Efraim) sued Pamela Lee Anderson for $4.6 million for walking away from oral and written contracts. The defendant (Anderson) claims to have agreed to the contracts on the stipulation that the script would be revised concerning nudity and simulated sex scenes‚ and upon reading the final script and seeing simulated sex scenes still included‚ walked out. 2. What is the legal issue? The
Premium Contract Void Gentlemen's agreement
Mazzagati v. Everingham‚ 512 Pa. 266 (1986). Facts: An automobile driven by Defendant fatally struck Plaintiff’s daughter. At the time of the accident‚ Plaintiff received a telephone call immediately after the collision at work informing her that her daughter had been involved in an automobile accident. Plaintiff arrived at the scene of the accident a few minutes later. Procedural Posture: Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the nature of a Demurrer granted by the Montgomery County
Premium Law Negligence Plaintiff
Maryland v. Shatzer‚ 559 U.S. 98 (2010) FACTS: In August of 2003 Detective Shane Blankenship‚ a social worker‚ was assigned to investigate and interview Michael Shatzer about claims that Shatzer had sexually abused his three year old son. At the time of the investigation Shatzer was incarcerated at Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown for an unrelated child-sexual abuse offense. Before asking Shatzer any questions‚ Detective Blankenship informed Shatzer of his rights‚ Shatzer then obtained
Premium Child abuse Human sexual behavior Prison