Reiko Brady Intro to Political Science 8 March 2013 Idealism vs Realism Machiavelli says the prince only has to seem good‚ not be good. Plato insists that seeming is bad‚ being is good. Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accepted that fact that humans are brutal‚ selfish‚ and fickle while Plato was an idealist who believed people could be ruled by a philosopher king who ruled over the warriors and tradesmen of his ideal republic with rationality. In his view the philosopher-king
Premium Political philosophy Plato Philosophy
The Church accused Niccolo Machiavelli of being Satan for writing his book The Prince. Machiavelli completed The Prince in 1513. He wrote it as a gift to Lorenzo Medici‚ called the Magnificent‚ ruler of Florence. The political views Machiavelli expressed in his book went against the theology of the Church‚ specifically the Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes. Machiavelli wrote to gain control of a principality one must be brutal. "(I)f you are a prince in possession of a newly acquired state
Premium Florence Ten Commandments Cesare Borgia
or evil. Machiavelli argues simply that man is self-centered and only after self preservation. He argues that mankind is immoral and greedy. His opinions are apparent as he states‚ "It may be said of men in general that they are ungrateful‚ voluble‚ dissemblers‚ anxious to avoid danger‚ and covetous of gain‚" in the eighteenth paragraph of The Prince. These thoughts and views have gained him the title of a cynic. More than a cynic however‚ Machiavelli is but a realist. Machiavelli feels that
Premium Morality
the oppressors and the oppressed. Niccolo Machiavelli‚ being a mixture of the two due to his living condition while writing the book‚ gained a middle-ground which allowed him to achieve omnipotent intelligence that so many rulers normally lack‚ first hand experience of what it like to live both lives‚ one as a peasant and the other as a nobleman. This
Premium Mercenary Political philosophy The Prince
endeavor and very few rulers have been able to accomplish this. "This leads us to a question that is in dispute: Is it better to be loved than feared‚ or vice versa?" (Machiavelli‚ 51) An effective ruler would be one that relies upon fear without hatred‚ rather than love‚ as described by Niccolo Machiavelli in his book The Prince. In a perfect world all people would be good-hearted‚
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Cesare Borgia
Unlike the idealistic ancient philosophers such as Plato‚ who discusses politics in “the context of things above politics” (Machiavelli vii)‚ the modern philosophers‚ Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes‚ take a realistic approach in explaining political actions and outcomes. Considered to be among the first social scientists‚ they both try to delve deep into the nature of mankind and its relationship to politics. In the course of doing so‚ both authors seem to believe that virtue and morality‚
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes Philosophy
Machiavelli versus Hobbs. Philosophers of Political Realism and Self Interest In this paper‚ I will be taking ideas from two philosophers‚ Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes. Specifically‚ I will be focusing on the agreement and disagreement of the two philosophers listed above. Based on my interpretation from the two text‚ there has been an agreement between Machiavelli and Hobbes which states that there should be a strong central government to protect and control the people.
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes Social contract
Moderns (ACS- 1000) February 11‚ 2014 The Political Power of Virtue Niccolò Machiavelli’s‚ The Prince‚ emphasizes the need for realism‚ as opposed to idealism in order to achieve a functional society. He reveals the principles that a ruler must follow in order to achieve success‚ and acknowledges reprehensible traits of princes that are just as important for becoming an effective leader. Machiavelli discourages the idea of selfless virtue by supporting the notion that the ends justify the means
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
A Contrast of Political Controversy: The Prince versus Capital It is often very difficult to judge which policies and principalities are correct when comparing and contrasting controversial literary works. In The Prince‚ Niccolo Machiavelli presents many ideas that may be looked at as unethical by the general population of a nation. In fact‚ Machiavelli’s ideas were looked down upon by his own nation‚ Italy‚ resulting in his eventual exile. For Karl Marx‚ Capital presents many contradictions
Free Marxism Capitalism Karl Marx
Machiavelli differs from the many political theorists who offer conceptions of a “natural state‚” a presocial condition arising solely from human instinct and character. But while Machiavelli never puts forth a vision of what society would be like without civil government‚ he nonetheless presents a coherent‚ although not particularly comprehensive‚ vision of human nature. Machiavelli mentions explicitly a number of traits innate among humans. People are generally self-interested‚ although their
Premium Political philosophy