Seneca‚ Smith‚ and Nietzsche introduce interesting variations in their philosophical ideas of emotions and passions in the political realm. While Stoicism calls for the banishment of emotions all together‚ Smith advocates for putting oneself in another’s situation and imagine their feelings. Nietzsche on the other hand offers an amusing account of acknowledging the detrimental effects of suppression and internalization of emotions‚ which thereby produce bad conscience. Consistent with the Stoic
Premium Psychology Emotion Stoicism
Nietzsche conveys that out of the two moralities‚ it’s better to not be under slave morality. Their way of life is ailing and deranged. They will always be on the hunt to get revenge on their enemies. It’s a distraction for them to live a civilized life. Although Beverly isn’t living a civilized life. She’s doing more to clear out societies problems than the nobles. For what Beverly’s victims and opposers do that they think is right for themselves or society‚ is clearly out of line. If Beverly think
Premium Woman Gender Gender role
Jessica Harding December 3st‚ 2010 Nietzsche Independent Study Friedrich Nietzsche: Pain‚ Suffering and the Death of God In order to understand Nietzsche‚ one must actually feel‚ physically and emotionally‚ the pain which was the catalyst that inspired him. The phenomenon of pain effects humans different than animals‚ as humans are both emotionally and physically aware of the pain. Human beings know what it is to tell the great lie of our culture. This lie is the denial of suffering in
Premium Friedrich Nietzsche Nihilism God
problem of evil has shown to be one of the most significant objections to the existence of God. According to most theology‚ God is omniscient‚ omnipotent‚ and omnibenevolent. Everyone sees and experiences evil‚ no matter how innocent and good-hearted‚ which begs the question: “How could God let this happen?” The evils talked about in the problem of evil are moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is that which occurs from moral human agents such as rape‚ murder‚ and theft. Natural evil is the suffering
Premium Problem of evil God Philosophy of religion
The Evil of Politics and the Ethics of Evil Author(s): Hans J. Morgenthau Source: Ethics‚ Vol. 56‚ No. 1 (Oct.‚ 1945)‚ pp. 1-18 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2988705 Accessed: 21/09/2010 06:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use‚ available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use provides‚ in part‚ that unless you have obtained prior
Premium Ethics Morality
have ambition and the will to achieve greatness is considered a noble character‚ however‚ when the influence of evil is exposed to this noble characteristic‚ it will become corrupted and unnatural. Unnatural ambition drives Macbeth to commit treacherous acts which leads to his decent into evil and ultimately‚ his own downfall. Macbeth is startled when he first hears his prophecy from the evil witches. He is astonished when he receives news from Ross and Angus regarding receiving the title of Thane of
Premium Macbeth Three Witches Duncan I of Scotland
Shay Bridges Professor David Smith Philosophy101 27 November 2015 Free to Treat Others However We Wish? Would William James Agree? It is true that philosophers William James and Friedrich Nietzsche have had a widespread influence on the entire philosophy world. Though their theories on truth and morality are very different‚ there is some solid common ground. This essay plans to summarize the theories of both philosophers and show how they are similar. It will also explain if one has to agree with
Premium Philosophy Morality Immanuel Kant
anti-morality and anti-nature are aspects‚ which negate vital instincts. Friedrich Nietzsche is a renowned philosopher who criticized social laws‚ religion‚ and honorable in a radical manner. Nietzsche argues that‚ “anti-nature refers to the idea of allowing human beings to coerce others into adopting their beliefs and morals” (Friedrich 404). Friedrich Nietzsche had a personal belief that morality is anti-nature. In fact‚ Nietzsche states that‚ “Every naturalism in morality-that is every health morality-is
Premium Morality Religion Ethics
Nietzsche does not discuss Religion‚ he does not discuss biblical precepts‚ but he read some apostle with a priori points of view? It is necessary to observe in this point that Nietzsche does not criticize Religion‚ Christianity; he criticizes the interpretation of Religion‚ although he cites biblical passages‚ ironically always‚ except the analysis of St. Paul‚ that is extensive. Nietzsche thinks be discoursing about Religion‚ but he discourses about philosophy all the time‚ philosophy of Religion
Premium Religion Philosophy Friedrich Nietzsche
recently‚ I’ve discovered the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Gloria Anzaldúa. Compared with the other philosophies‚ these two seem to be the most similar in at least their belief that there is no one right way to the good life‚ but rather there are many and are suited to each individual. I will begin with the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche whose ideals he defends with the genealogy of morality. In his book Genealogy of Morals‚ Nietzsche is critical of “bad conscience” and considers it to
Premium On the Genealogy of Morality Beyond Good and Evil Friedrich Nietzsche