Nietzsche begins by tearing apart the philosopher and his views. They idolize concepts and threaten the life of anything they worship. In Nietzsche’s opinion‚ once the philosophers got to these concepts nothing managed to escape alive. In response Nietzsche says‚ “that which is‚ does not become; that which becomes‚ is not.” Nietzsche explains that the philosophers all believe in the which is‚ however they fail to understand so instead they search for a reason why it withholds itself from them. Finally
Premium Philosophy Mind Morality
Hegelian dialectic - professed that mankind was developing in an upward direction‚ becoming more angelic as it were. Man’s moral laws were more advanced‚ as support for democracy and equal rights were beginning to become popular. However‚ Friedrich Nietzsche believed that mankind was entering a downward spiral towards complete decadence. Modern man‚ with its "advanced" morality‚ was‚ in truth‚ decaying on the inside. Claims of morality merely masked modern man’s decay: he is veiled behind moral formulas
Premium
each other. In Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche the discussion God being seen as a different figure to all religions is brought up. In my response‚ I will analysis the passages 55‚ 66‚ 67‚ 129‚ and 183. Passage 55 states‚ “There is a great ladder of religious cruelty with many rungs; but three of them are the most important. At one time one sacrificed human beings to one’s god‚ perhaps precisely those human beings one loved best….” (Nietzsche 55). When this statement is made‚ he is explaining
Premium
Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality. Nietzsche depicts the aristocratic man‚ the noble man‚ very distinctly with qualities of mentality and behavior. An aristocratic man embraces his sovereignty‚ relishes in life‚ and refuses to feel guilt. Odysseus lives what Nietzsche describes as a good and noble life‚ a life characterized by action and war. Odysseus not only is King of Ithaca‚ but also the epitome of the aristocratic man in attitude and action. Nietzsche conveys his admiration of the noble
Premium Odyssey Homer Odysseus
Friedrich Nietzsche and Karl Marx were intellectuals with vastly different world views and opinions on how things should be run but the one matter in which they would both agree leaves a bad taste in their mouths is Christianity. Nietzsche see Christianity as a blight upon humans‚ something holding us back from our fullest potential. Karl Marx does not necessarily see Christianity as the great evil that Nietzsche makes it out to be‚ but he would agree that complicated monolith that is Christianity
Premium Religion Philosophy Karl Marx
Nietzsche also talks about the origin of the noble conception of good and bad in terms of the linguistics during (Genealogy‚ I §4-5) where he comments that the word for bad in German Schlecht is practically identical to the German word for plain Schlicht with him saying that this indicates that in the noble morality the bad is only that which is common or simple but it is not meant in a derogatory way it is meant only so to separate them from the nobles or the good. He comments further that he believes
Premium Human William Shakespeare Othello
might not be so far off. Both Nietzsche and Dr. King were thought of as “radical thinkers‚” and are still thought of as “radical thinkers” till this day‚ for completely separate reasons. But I believe that their motivations/motives are the reason why their views in morality are equivalent in seriousness to; fundamentally the same. Even though these two great “critical thinkers” have opposing views in certain important issues‚ such as Christianity‚ I believe that if Nietzsche were to have lived during
Premium Morality Martin Luther King, Jr. Religion
Immanuel Kant Summery: There are two faculties of the mind: theoretical reason and practical reason. Theoretical reason allows us to answer the question‚ "What can I know?"‚ while practical reason allows us to answer the question‚ "What ought I to do?". For Kant‚ practical reason issues a duty to respect its law. That is‚ morality is not rooted in consequences (consequentialism)‚ but rather in sheer duty (deontological ethics). For Kant‚ practical reason issues a "categorical imperative"
Premium Immanuel Kant Morality
Morality) Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche‚ a German philosopher thought up of the idea that there are two moralities; The master and slave morality. These define a person by there actions to there world around them and how they handle certain situations they encounter throughout their natural life. I believe he chose these two because they seem to be strong opposites and there are rational. The first morality Nietzsche writes about is the master morality. Nietzsche defined master morality as the
Premium Friedrich Nietzsche Ressentiment
meaning we can come to‚ rendering us philosophically immobile. Grappling with the demands of reality while keeping up with the pace of post-modernity proves to be a daunting responsibility‚ but alas‚ it is a chore we must reconcile ourselves with. As Nietzsche proclaims‚ “We remain unknown to ourselves‚ we seekers of knowledge‚ even to ourselves: and with good reason‚”[1] he begins to assemble the foundations for what would be a thorough investigation - - a search‚ for that sense of comfort we associate
Premium On the Genealogy of Morality Friedrich Nietzsche Beyond Good and Evil