"Nietzsche versus kant on morality" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 14 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality and Happiness

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Morality has been a term of debate for several years by intellectuals who have not come to the final conclusion of its definition. According to Damon (5)‚ morality is an existing‚ multifaceted construct that may not be pinned down by any single definitional criteria which is flexible. The moral character has long been associated with happiness which is that state of having achieved one’s desires although there are some disconnections. Several theories have been forwarded in connection to morality

    Premium Morality Ethics Happiness

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Discuss the emergence of guilt in light of Nietzsche’s analysis in the genealogy. You are expected to trace the sequence Nietzsche presents in describing the descent towards guilt. • Creditor and debtor relationship "I have already let it out: in the contractual relationship between creditor and debtor‚ which is as old as the very conception of a ‘legal subject’ and itself refers back to the basic forms of buying‚ selling‚ bartering‚ trade and traffic." (p.43 2nd essay) see pg 49 for

    Premium Morality Religion Friedrich Nietzsche

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    between what is morally right and wrong thing to do. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) outlined in his book Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785). “reason tells us what we ought to do‚ and when we obey our own reason‚ only then are we truly free" (President and Harvard‚ 2011). Kant describes a situation where in life one should do the right thing not for appearances‚ but because doing the right thing is the morally correct thing to do. Kant dictates that there is a fundamental principle of ethics‚

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Suicide

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    her life. In addition to this‚ the killing and suicide appears to be done in order to mitigate further suffering. However‚ if one looks at Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals‚ it is evident that this type of analysis is flawed. According to Kant‚ the rightness or wrongness of an action does not rest upon the particulars of the situation. Therefore‚ if one were to use Kantian ideas‚ Mr. Snelling’s actions cannot be deemed morally right only based on the unique circumstances of his situation

    Premium Death Suicide English-language films

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    we can indeed perceive a modern philosophy and ethics‚ by monitoring a reflection of insightful philosophers of Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant. In this regard‚ however‚ Hobbes and Kant’s are differing in so many ways as they have entirely different perspective on the issue of morality and pragmatism. This disparity can be viewed‚ by how Kant’s view morality in more of a rationalistic way‚ while Hobbes being more empirical on the topic of ethics.Therefore‚ they both took a person-centered approach

    Premium Morality Philosophy

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Universal Law and The Formula of the End in Itself. The first formulation is best described by the following statement‚ “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law without contradiction.” (Kant‚ 1785‚ 1993). What does this mean? A maxim is the fundamental rule of conduct or your moral belief upon which you chose to act. A universal law is a law that everyone must follow regardless of the outcome. How do we determine if the maxim can

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant Vs Utilitarianism

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Paper 1 Question 1 One of the most significant philosophers in today’s world by the name of Immanuel Kant established an ethical theory with Utilitarianism. Kant’s moral theory was identified as difficult to learn‚ but once understood people understanding it must know the necessities as well. I will be explaining an argument that can support these views‚ as well as disprove them. One formula that Kant uses is the Formula of the End in Itself. We must recognize what it initially means to treat a person

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Ethics

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant in “Hotel Rwanda” The Ethical theory of Emmanuel Kant is based on the idea that morality is based on good will‚ not happiness. Kant believed that as long as a person had good intent‚ then the action was also good no matter what the outcome was. If a person chose to do something good‚ but for unmoral reasons rather than out of respect for the law‚ then they did not have good intent and therefore the action is bad‚ even if it has good consequences. To determine whether or not a persons intent

    Premium Morality Ethics

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant Deontology

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    we have towards another person‚ a group or society as a whole. In this sense‚ deontology is concerned with the intrinsic properties of actions‚ not their end result. Immanuel Kant is arguably the most famous advocate of modern deontology. According to Kant‚ moral law is synthetic apriori and took an absolutist approach. Kant argued that since everyone possesses the capacity to reason and has a conscience‚ it would be possible for all people to arrive at an understanding of moral truths without the

    Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Deontological ethics

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant Vs Aristotle

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Despite several overlapping similarities between Aristotle and Kant on virtue ethics‚ there are fundamental differences between their view on the source of virtuous action. In this paper‚ I will argue‚ the underpinning behind each respectable view differs; as Aristotle believes virtuous action derives from choices lying in the mean whereas‚ Kant does not hold that virtuous action lies in the mean‚ but rather‚ holds they proceed from duty acting in accordance with universal principles. The fundamental

    Premium Virtue Ethics

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 50