Case note on Nike Cost of Capital Group 2 Members : Devendra Rane‚ Vivekkumar Nema‚ Chandrashekhar Joshi‚ G. Ajithkumar‚ Prakash Shetty Case Background: * NorthPoint Large Cap Fund weighing whether to buy Nike’s stock. * Nike has experienced sales growth decline‚ declines in profits and market share. * Nike has revealed that it would increase exposure in mid-price footwear and apparel lines. It also commits to cut down expenses. * Kimi Ford’s initial assessment at a discount rate
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Arithmetic mean Financial markets
|Corporate Finance | |Nike Case | | | | |
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Stock Stock market
Learning & Development Council‚ CAC Opportunity cost: Taken into account for economic decisions. Opportunity Cost is the “next best” or “alternative” benefit from an investment Sunk costs: Never taken into account for economic decisions. Marginal Analysis: Used for profit maximization (deciding how much to produce) where TR and TC are functions of quantity. To maximize profits we take derivative=0 P r o f it M a x im iz a t io n G r a p h For profit maximization‚ marginal revenue should be equal
Premium Consumer theory Supply and demand Economics
drinks under the Coke brand name. The most common of these is Diet Coke‚ with others including Caffeine-Free Coca-Cola‚ Diet Coke Caffeine-Free‚ Coca-Cola Cherry‚ Coca-Cola Zero‚ Coca-Cola Vanilla‚ and special editions with lemon‚ lime or coffee. Brand building strategy -: Brand development strategy of Coca Cola has been far reaching and has managed to remain in the limelight ever since it became a favorite with the non alcoholic drinkers. It has been noticed that brand loyalty is an important
Premium Coca-Cola
Market Research Nike : Associating Athletes‚ Performance‚ and the Brand 12/16/2013 PGDITBM 13-14 (Group 3) Submitted By: Karuna Turlapati (13030264008) Lokesh Jha (13030264009)
Premium Athletic shoe Measurement Nike, Inc.
shoe¨ while he was producing the item. He then changed the company´s name from J.W. Foster and Sons to Reebok. Although Reebok has been in the shadows of major competitors Nike and Adidas‚ they still manage to be a successfful sports wear market. Reebok underrstands customers neeeds and continue to enhance as an international brand. While sportswear is becoming increasingly popular the bulk of sales ccome from the Rss 2000 to Rs 4000 segment compared to twwo years ago when mmost of the sales would come
Premium Reebok Athletic shoe Adidas
“Global Brands vs. Local Brands” A big issue facing the international marketing world today is whether global branding is better then local branding. Consumers all over the world have many different opinions on whether they like purchasing products from big corporate‚ multicultural companies or the local mom and pop shops that they have grown to know‚ and became comfortable with. The pros and cons of both global and local branding vary from good and bad. In my opinion local branding are still
Premium Brand Brand management Branding
Mini Case: Nike’s Decision Nike‚ a U.S.-based company with a globally recognized brand name‚ manufactures athletic shoes in such Asian developing countries as China‚ Indonesia‚ and Vietnam using subcontractors‚ and sells the products in the U.S. and foreign markets. The company has no production facilities in the United States. In each of those Asian countries where Nike has production facilities‚ the rates of unemployment and underemployment are quite high. The wage rate is very low in those
Premium Wage Minimum wage Working class
NIKE Business Case Study Management Theory (BUS830-13) Submitted to: Dr. J. Saleeby Done by: Rola El Cheikh 201005281 Thursday‚ December 23‚ 2010 Executive Summary Nike hit the ground running in 1962. Originally known as Blue Ribbon Sports‚ the company focused on providing high quality running shoes designed especially for athletes by athletes‚ at competitive prices. Today‚ Nike is the world’s leading maker of athletic shoes‚ equipment and apparel. Nike has invested highly on marketing
Premium Nike, Inc. Athletic shoe
…………………………………………………………………..p.6 Profile of CEO………………….…………………………………………………………………..p.7 Competitor’s Profile………….…………………………………………………………………….p.7 Industry Profile……………………………………………………………………………………..p.8 Company Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………p.9 Industry Analysis………………………………………………………………………………......p.24 Top Competitor Analysis………………………………………………………………………….p.25 Other External Forces…………………………………………………………………………….p.26 Key Opportunity……………………………………………………………………………..….…p.27 Key Threat…………………………………………………………………………………………p
Premium Athletic shoe Nike, Inc.