Varun Patel Philosophy 131 Michael F. Martin 03/08/2010 The Ford Pinto Case and Utilitarianism In this essay‚ I will talk about the ford Pinto case‚ and how the information was withheld from public in order to save company from huge losses and at the same time keep company’s reputation intact. I don’t think the decision of the ford company to with hold the information about the safety-issue of the car for which they were already aware of; was the right thing to do. I agree‚ as a utilitarian
Premium Ford Motor Company Ford Pinto Ethics
Nike Executive Summary Kimi Ford manages a large mutual fund for NorthPoint Group. Her company is trying to decide whether or not to invest in Nike’s stock‚ which has been declining in price in the past year. Kimi has asked her assistant‚ Joanna Cohen‚ to estimate Nike’s weight average cost of capital (WACC) to help make this decision (Case 13‚ pg. 58). We looked at Joanna’s estimates and discovered a few problems that she made when estimating her cost of capital. We found Joanna’s estimates
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Investment Financial markets
Case Study Nike Introduction Good morning ladies and gentlemen and thank for taking the time to meet with us. Nike was founded on January 25‚ 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports by Bill Bowerman and Philip Knight. The company officially became Nike‚ Inc. on May 30‚ 1978. Nike has various products which include footwear as well as other apparel that compliment the former. This accounts for 92 percent of the company’s revenue. The other 8 percent comes from equipment and non Nike brand products‚ such as Cole
Premium Stock Nike, Inc. Weighted average cost of capital
Introduction and Background Kimi Ford is a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group‚ a mutual-fund management firm. In July 2001‚ Ford considered buying shares of Nike‚ Inc.‚ the well-known athletic shoe manufacturer. It would be prudent of Ford to base her assessment on Nike’s financial reports for 2001. Around the same time‚ Nike held an analysts’ meeting to disclose those financial results. They also addressed ways to revitalize the company‚ since share price was beginning to decline and revenues
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Financial markets Finance
Ford Pinto Case John Fraughton Jr. Taylor Gray Brenda Greenwell Christopher Macintyre Leanne Marks University of Phoenix MGT 216 March 17‚ 2010 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Recommended Solutions and Supporting Information to the Ford Pinto Case 3 Traffic Safety and Accident Data 4 Ethical Opinion 5 Influences from External Social Pressures 5 Case Examined with the Period Eye 6 Conclusion 8 References 9 Introduction Very few 20 to 30 year olds know of
Premium Ford Motor Company Ford Pinto Automotive industry
Executive Summary Ford is one of the leading companies in the auto industry. The director of Supply Chain Systems at Ford was put in a tough position to make recommendations with regards to the company’s supply chain strategy. There are two groups within Ford that have two different opinions on how Ford should be using emerging information technologies and ideas from high tech industries‚ such as Dell‚ to change the way it interacts with suppliers. The first group argued that Ford should adopt Dell’s
Premium Supply chain management Automotive industry Supply chain
The Ford Pinto was a subcompact vehicle that Ford Motor Company manufactured from 1970- 1980. The Pinto caught on with consumers‚ and sales of the vehicle were high. However‚ serious problems quickly arose regarding the design of the Pinto. The gas tank on the vehicles was placed directly behind the rear axle instead of above it‚ with only nine inches of space between the gas tank and axle. Bolts were also placed close to the gas tank‚ increasing the risk that they could puncture the tank in an accident
Premium Ford Pinto
FORD CASE STUDY 1. Using competing values‚ assess why Ford is widely considered more effective than GM. How could GM have used the competing-values approach in the early 1980s to recognize that it had problems? • In case of Ford motors they were earlier implementing the Rational Goal Model that lays immense emphasis of higher level of productivity‚ efficiency and profit. The decision-making is centralized to the higher-level authority with very less or no participation from the lower level
Premium Decision making Ford Motor Company Henry Ford
A Case Analysis of Nike: The Sweatshop Debate Mindi Merritt Class Fall 2014 Instructor’s Name Introduction Nike is a hugely successful global industry that designs and markets shoes and apparel (Coakley & Kates‚ 2013). Most of Nike’s products are subcontracted and manufactured overseas in countries such as China‚ India‚ Vietnam‚ Indonesia and Korea. For decades‚ Nike has been embroiled in controversy where critics claim its products are manufactured in foreign factories with substandard
Premium Labor Child labour Wage
SCMA Ford Motor Company Case Study Contents Executive Summary 2 Issue identification with Root Cause Analysis 3 Understanding Forecasts with the new Ford 2000 Projects 3 Ford’s current supplier base is excessive 4 Purchasing structure within the Ford organization 4 Environmental Factors 5 Alternatives 6 Keep its existing supply chain 6 Recommendation 6 Create a vertically integrated supply chain based on Dell’s model 6 Create a website for direct purchases 7 A pull system should be implemented
Premium Supply chain management Supply chain