Case note ASIC v Adler (No 3) (2002) 20 ACLC 576 Parties 1 2 3 Plaintiff: Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) Defendants: Rodney Adler‚ Raymond Williams‚ Dominic Fodera and the Adler Corporation Pty Limited Judge: Santow J Facts 4 HIHC made an undocumented $10 million payment to a company controlled by Adler‚ PEE. Around the time of the payment‚ PEE became a trustee of a unit trust controlled by the Adler Corporation and two others. Units in the Trust were issued to HIHC
Premium Corporation Corporate governance Investment
“Much of the criticism directed at ASIC comes from elements within the corporate sector which have a vested interest in undermining ASIC’s role. Without ASIC‚ the Australian corporate scene would have a far lower standard of management and directors‚ and accordingly the corporate sector’s status within‚ and contribution to‚ the Australian economy would be inferior‚ to say the least.” Discuss. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is the main regulator of companies
Premium Criminal law Financial market Corporate governance
Executive Summary Nike Inc. Peretti Vs. Nike: In January 2001‚ Peretti choose the word Sweatshop’ to be printed in his Nikes. Nike rejected order citing the company’s rules. In retort‚ Peretti order a pair of shoes with a colour snapshot of 10-year-old Vietnamese girl who makes my shoes". With the email exchange between Nike and Peretti being forwarded all over the world‚ it led to a huge PR Nightmare for the organization. All through Mid-1990s‚ Nike has been subjected to negative press‚
Premium Athletic shoe Manufacturing Nike, Inc.
Nike vs Puma Easily the biggest grudge match in Germany this month will not be between two of the countries competing‚ but between homegrown Adidas and‚ of course‚ American arch-rivals Nike. The business media is already hot on the Stripes versus the Swoosh‚ with the German brand reportedly splashing out double Nike’s estimated £60m World Cup marketing spend. But what about the shirts themselves? Which ones would you want to play in‚ and which should be left on the backs of the die-hards down the
Premium Nike, Inc. Germany Middle East
Nike vs. Adidas Deonnah Carolus Consumer Behavior – 3310 Nike‚ founded January 25‚ 1964‚ is one of the world’s best known and popular brands. Created by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight‚ Nike has become one of the world’s largest athletic apparel suppliers and today markets it product under its own brand name which includes Nike Pro‚ Nike Golf‚ Nike Skateboarding and the infamous Nike Air Jordan. At the end of 2012 the company had an estimated net worth of $15.9 Billion had over
Premium Nike, Inc. Adidas Psychographic
Individual Assignment - ENMN 430 Erkens Gjini Legal Case Brief Jacobson vs. Nike Canada Inc.‚ Instructor: Connie Carter November 9th‚ 2014 Introduction In the case of Jacobsen vs. Nike Canada Ltd‚ Mr. Jacobsen an employer of Nike Canada Ltd was seriously injured in a car accident as a result of alcohol consumption while at work. This paper will prove that the defendant (Nike Canada Ltd.) was negligent in all the four elements of “Negligence “ and therefore liable for the
Premium Tort Negligence Law
Jackson ENGL 101 November 9‚ 2012 Nike vs. Adidas Nike and Adidas are two of the most popular sporting attires out in the clothing and equipment market. Both Nike and Adidas offer people and athletes a broad selection of great apparel and athletic equipment. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast Nike and Adidas companies in terms of headquarters‚ market focus‚ sponsorships‚ marketing‚ advertising‚ price‚ product‚ and its production. Both Nike and Adidas are sportswear companies
Premium Nike, Inc.
Jordans vs. Nikes Once Michael Jordan wore the famous Jordan shoes‚ every person who played basketball wanted them. There’s no competition when you compare Jordan shoes with others‚ not even Nike can compete against Jordan. Even though Nike throughout the Years has made some great quality shoes‚ shoe fanatics have wanted Jordan shoes more than ever since Michael Jordan flew from free-throw line with his own pair of Jordan retro 3’s. The different attributes that Nike and Jordan have are material
Premium Michael Jordan Nike, Inc. Basketball
Nike vs. Reebok Questions 1. "The success of Nike was strictly fortuitous and had little to do with great decision making." Evaluate this statement. The important part of the success was due to the far-sight of Nike’s management team. Nike’s CEO‚ who was a marathoner and knew what runners wanted for their shoes‚ had made a very basic strategy work; "make the products that fit their consumers’ needs". Examples of great decision making are: Diversifying products (into sports wears and others)
Premium Nike, Inc. Athletic shoe Michael Jordan
Asics has been developing sports shoes for more than 50 years and yet there principles haven?t changed. Everything Asics undertakes at its research and development center in Kobe‚ Japan is developed on the basis of scientific work with the intensive cooperation of male and female athletes‚ and with a very clear objective: To enable professional and recreational athletes all over the world to perform better‚ to reach a higher level and to enjoy themselves. Asics has been traditionally associated
Premium Athletic shoe Footwear Shoe