of the reasons Nokia has fallen so fast is that it has a simple branding problem: Nokia isn’t a distinctive brand. It is a brand with positive associations and high awareness‚ but it isn’t unique. For many years‚ Nokia seemed to successfully do what marketing experts say you can’t do: serve all segments in a market. Nokia sold very high-end‚ technologically advanced phones and simple‚ inexpensive phones‚ all under the Nokia brand. The branding structure was very simple: the Nokia brand with a product
Premium Marketing
Introduction The company that we choose from the list is Nokia. Over the past 150 years‚ Nokia has evolved from a riverside paper mill in southwestern Finland to a global telecommunications leader connecting over 1.3 billion people. During that time‚ they’ve made rubber boots and car tires. They’ve generated electricity. They’ve even manufactured TVs. Nokia Corporation is a Finnish multinational communications and information technology corporation that is headquartered in Espoo‚ Finland
Premium Nokia Smartphone Mobile phone
COUNTRY REPRESENT •Finnish Company •Nokianvirta river Nokia‚ Finland YEAR OF BIRTH Company started in 1865 as wood pulp mill. After 1963 Nokia started producing radio telephone COMPANY PRODUCT Early products: Wood pulp Rubber Cables and Television Main Product: Mobile Phone‚ Smart Phone‚ Mobile Computers‚ etc. FOUNDER OF THE COMPANY •The company was initially founded by Fredrik Idestam in 1865 •But it was later converted into a share company
Free Mobile phone Nokia
1.1 The Morph concept The “Nokia Morph” is a theoretical future device based on nanotechnology that might enable future communication devices. It is intended to demonstrate the flexibility of future mobile devices‚ in regards to their shape and form allowing the users to transform them according to their preference. It demonstrates the ultimate functionality that nanotechnology might be capable of delivering i.e. flexible materials‚ transparent electronics and self-cleaning surfaces. It also features
Premium Nanotechnology
Strategic Management Nokia Contents 1. Mission 2. Analysis of stakeholder 3. Identification of existing strategies 4. Internal audit A. Resources B. Competences C. Corporate culture D. Value chain E. Summary of what delivers competitive advantage F. Summary of Key strengths and weaknesses 5. External audit A. Remote Environment B. Operating environment C. Boston Matrix D. Summary of Key opportunities and threats 6. Identify strategic option 7
Free Mobile phone
Nokia Connects: A Case study Alyssa Crowder Bus 302 Professor Day 4/27/10 What are the opportunities associated with being first into a major new country market? What are the risks? There are many benefits of being the first company to introduce your product on the market in a new country. One advantage would be gaining sales and popularity‚ by introducing your brand new product. But before they decide to launch their product in a new country‚ the company needs to research the target
Premium Mobile phone
Microsoft and Nokia. This ‘transformation’‚ turning Microsoft into a ‘devices and services’ company‚ is key to the company’s continuing survival‚ and would be impossible without Nokia. Here are four reasons why the acquisition had to happen: Microsoft need to keep its momentum Recent industry figures have shown Microsoft’s Windows Phone 8 posting its highest ever market share allowing the mobile OS to leapfrog BlackBerry and become the third-most popular globally. This means that Windows Phone
Premium Smartphone Windows Mobile Microsoft
globalization‚ people can sell anywhere take advantage of a country’ resources (cheap labour‚ human intellect‚ lower taxes etc.) take advantage of a country’s less strict labour laws (ex. child labour) · Was the German backlash against Nokia justifiedadd your own opinion? How can nations make themselves more competitive? · New plant developed would be to maximize output in production to Europe‚ Middle East and Africa · Other manufacturers (ex. BenQ [bankrupt]‚ Motorola)
Premium Middle East Labour relations Supply and demand
Michael Porter in his article “The-competitive-advantage-of-nations-(1990)” discusses how a firm or a region can build competitive advantage and strategy. Porter argues that Competitive advantage is often not an outcome of favorable factor and macro-economic conditions as classical economists insists. A nation’s competitiveness depends on the ability of its industries to innovate. Porter introduces the concept of “the diamond of national advantage” - a system that some nations establish for its industries
Premium Mobile phone Public policy Nokia
(I) Reguladores (I) R l d Organizadores (O) Propósito P ó it (Z) Insumos Transformación (Y) Bienes / Servicios (X) Suministradores (S) Actores (A) Clientes (C) Declaración de Identidad STAKEHOLDERS + INTERVINIENTES = PARTICIPANTES Stakeholder Toda aquella persona‚ grupos de personas‚ organizaciones o instituciones que son relevantes para la transformación que lleva a cabo la organización T-ASCO-I Cadena de Valor de Porter (CVP)/Modelo Delta (Efectividad Operacional
Premium Sociedad