rP os t 9-711-462 REV: MAY 26‚ 2011 DAVID B. YOFFIE RENEE KIM op yo Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 For more than a century‚ Coke and Pepsi vied for “th roat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles in the so-called cola wars were fought over the $74 billion carbonated soft e drink (CSD) industry in the United States.1 In a “carefu lly waged competitive struggle” that lasted u from 1975 through the mid-1990s‚ both Coke and Pepsi a chieved
Premium Coca-Cola
op y 9-702-442 REV: JANUARY 27‚ 2004 DAVID B. YOFFIE tC Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century For over a century‚ Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for “throat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles of the cola wars were fought over the $60-billion industry in the United States‚ where the average American consumed 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) per year. In a “carefully waged competitive struggle‚” from 1975 to 1995 both
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
Seminar Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Matthew C Kiernan‚ Steve Vucic‚ Benjamin C Cheah‚ Martin R Turner‚ Andrew Eisen‚ Orla Hardiman‚ James R Burrell‚ Margaret C Zoing Lancet 2011; 377: 942–55 Published Online February 7‚ 2011 DOI:10.1016/S01406736(10)61156-7 Neuroscience Research Australia and Prince of Wales Clinical School‚ University of New South Wales‚ Sydney‚ Australia (Prof M C Kiernan DSc‚ B C Cheah MBiostat‚ J Burrell MBBS‚ M C Zoing BNurs); Western Clinical School‚ University
Premium Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Muscle Spinal cord
ACCA Paper F4 (ENG) Corporate and Business Law Class Notes June 2012 © Debbie Crossman‚ January 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced‚ stored in a retrieval system‚ or transmitted‚ in any form or by any means‚ electronic‚ mechanical‚ photocopying‚ recording or otherwise‚ without the prior written permission of Debbie Crossman. 2 www.studyinteractive.org Contents PAGE INTRODUCTION TO THE PAPER CHAPTER 1: ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM CHAPTER 2: LAW OF CONTRACT
Premium Common law Contract Law
DEMOLITION WORK Draft Code of Practice Table of Contents FOREWORD 4 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 4 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 What is demolition work? 5 1.2 Who has duties in relation to demolition work? 5 1.3 What is involved in managing the risks of demolition work? 6 2. MANAGING RISKS WITH DEMOLITION WORK 8 2.1 Identifying hazards 8 2.2 Assessing risks 8 2.3 Controlling the risks 8 2.4 Reviewing risk control measures 9 3. PLANNING THE DEMOLITION WORK 10
Premium Occupational safety and health Risk management
Curriculum Source References The following references were used in the CFA Institute-produced publications Quantitative Methods for Investment Analysis‚ Analysis of Equity Investments: Valuation‚ and Managing Investment Portfolios: A Dynamic Process. Ackerman‚ Carl‚ Richard McEnally‚ and David Ravenscraft. 1999. “The Performance of Hedge Funds: Risk‚ Return‚ and Incentives.” Journal of Finance. Vol. 54‚ No. 3: 833–874. ACLI Survey. 2003. The American Council of Life Insurers. Agarwal‚ Vikas and Narayan
Premium Investment Financial services Hedge fund
LWB138 Fundamentals of Torts Notes and Outline (ISAACS) Semester 1‚ 2008 Matthew Robinson Table of Contents Week 1: Introduction to Torts and Causes of Action 3 Purpose of the Law of torts 3 What is a Tort? 3 The Development of Torts 3 The Role of Torts 3 Insurance 4 Persons able to sue and be sued 4 Classifications of Causes of Actions 4 Trespass Actions 4 Actions on the case 5 Options between trespass and action on the case 5 Trespass to person 6 Battery 6 Assault 7 Defences
Premium Tort
ACCA Paper F4 (GLO) Corporate and Business Law For exams in 2012 Notes theexpgroup.com ExPress Notes ACCA F4 (GLO) Corporate and Business Law Page | 2 © 2012 The ExP Group. Individuals may reproduce this material if it is for their own private study use only. Reproduction by any means for any other purpose is prohibited. These course materials are for educational purposes only and so are necessarily simplified and summarised. Always obtain expert advice on any specific issue. Refer to our
Premium Law Corporation Common law
CME GROUP VOLUME AND OPEN INTEREST REPORT Page 01 Page 01 9:00 PM PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR BUSINESS DATE: 11/15/2013 PG 02 SUMMARY VOLUME AND OPEN INTEREST -- COMM/ALT INVESTMENT‚ EQUITY INDEX‚ INTEREST RATES AND FX FUTURES AND OPTIONS PG 02 COMMODITY AND ALTERNATE INVESTMENTS FUTURES PG 10 FOREIGN EXCHANGE FUTURES PG 14 INDEX FUTURES PG 16 INTEREST RATES FUTURES PG 19 COMMODITY AND ALTERNATE INVESTMENTS FUTURES PG 34 FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPTIONS PG
Premium Futures contract
9-706-447 REV: APRIL 16‚ 2009 DAVID B. YOFFIE Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 For more than a century‚ Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for “throat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles in the so-called cola wars were fought over the $66 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry in the United States.1 In a “carefully waged competitive struggle” that lasted from 1975 through the mid-1990s‚ both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual revenue growth of around
Premium Coca-Cola