Distributive Justice (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Page 1 of 26 Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free Distributive Justice First published Sun Sep 22‚ 1996; substantive revision Mon Mar 5‚ 2007 Principles of distributive justice are normative principles designed to guide the allocation of the benefits and burdens of economic activity. After outlining the scope of this entry and the role
Premium Political philosophy Law Justice
philosophers as well as economists. One of the topic raised is utilitarianism as the principle that holds inequality and distributive justice by Jeremy Betham (1748-1832). The idea is that the distribution of goods is just if and only if it maximizes aggregate utility (Reiss‚ 2013 p.256). Some critics were later discovered whether utilitarianism sustains the concept of distributive justice. Reiss for instance argued that utilitarianism ignores people’s right (p.261). Other conceptual difficulties of utilitarianism
Premium Justice Distributive justice Economic inequality
Aristotelian Ethics & Distributive Justice Concern with material equality as the central form of distributive justice is a very modern idea. Distributive justice for Aristotle and many other writers for millennia after him was a matter of distributing what each ought to get from merit or desert in some sense. The idea of equality was arguably anathema to Aristotle and most other theorists‚ including Catholic philosophers‚ until modern times‚ indeed until the nineteenth century. A common view was
Premium Justice Utilitarianism Magistrate
Robert Nozick breaks down his theory of distributive justice into three guidelines of justice which define how something not formerly owned by someone may be acquired‚ how possession of an item can be transferred from one individual to another and what should be done to resolve situations in which one of the first two rules in violated. For people to better understand his theory‚ Nozick uses a neutral term to define the possession of things‚ calling them “people’s holdings”. The principle of his
Premium
Justice Paper 2 -Ankur Shah Nozick says that "liberty upsets patterns." Critically assess this claim. Be sure to: I. Explain what the quoted phrase means (what Nozick means by “liberty” and by “patterns”); II. Discuss how Rawls would respond to Nozick’s thesis; III. Explain whether Nozick is right that liberty upsets patterns; IV. If Nozick is right‚ then discuss whether such "upsetting" of patterns provides a sound reason for rejecting patterns‚ or for regulating liberty.
Premium Political philosophy Distribution of wealth Liberalism
In an organization there has to be some type of justice. Which is organization justice‚ within this area there are three types of mechanisms‚ distributive‚ procedural‚ and interactional justice. Distributive justice is the equality of how people are treated in terms of reward or what is received from resources. Procedural justice is what is used to allot decisions through impartiality. Interactional justice is the quality of treatment received through methods that are employed. (Kreitner‚ & Kinicki
Premium Law Political philosophy Justice
2011 Peace and Eco-Social Justice: www.iiste.org Failed Distributive Justice‚ Violence and Militancy in India Jose Binoj School of International relations and Politics‚ Mahatma Gandhi University‚ Kerala‚ India * binoj.jose@yahoo.com Abstract Eco-social Justice which emphasizes on the need for economic and social justice along with environmental protection would bring forth peace. Peace is condition where social justice is prevalent and Social Justice is another condition based on
Premium John Rawls Justice Naxalite
second means is the voluntary transfer of ownership of holdings to someone else. A third means is the rectification of past injustices in the acquisition or transfer of holdings. According to Nozick‚ anyone who acquired what he has through these means is morally entitled to it. Thus the “entitlement” theory of justice states that the distribution of holdings in a society is just if (and only if) everyone in that society is entitled to what he has." Any distribution is only just if it arises from a distribution
Premium Political philosophy Justice Ethics
addition‚ Russian managerial subjects utilized need in their pay allocations. In a series of experiments‚ both Russian and U.S. students preferred the equity rule‚ although there were no productivity effects across different allocation rules. Procedural justice effects were also observed. Implications for pay practices are examined. Efforts to transform Eastern Europe to a free market economy have led to calls for assistance from the West in the design of managerial practices (McNulty‚ 1992; Shama‚ 1993)
Premium Distributive justice Justice Collectivism
Organizational Justice In today’s developing work life‚ organizational justice is increasingly important to the welfare of the organization‚ managers‚ and employees. Organizational justice shows how employees view the fairness of work-related issues in the workplace and the trust they have in the organization and its management. According to Burge‚ the study of organizational justice is important for three reasons: 1. Justice is a social aspect that strongly affects every-day life‚ whether
Premium Distributive justice Organizational studies and human resource management Justice