Name #1 Name #2 Date Case #82 Prairie Winds Pasta – Capital Budgeting Methods & Cash Flow Estimation Summary of Case Prairie Winds Pasta is experiencing a high demand for pasta from its customers. The customers demand delivery with in one week with a maximum allowance of 10 days. The facility is running at full capacity - 24 hours a day. Question 1 Define the term “incremental cash flow.” Since the project will be financed in part by debt‚ should the cash flow statement
Premium Cash flow Net present value Internal rate of return
USEC Case Case Analysis In response to the Energy Policy Act of 1992‚ the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) was created to privatize uranium enrichment for civilian use (Wikipedia). In 1998‚ USEC went public‚ and has been operating as a leading global energy supplier of enriched uranium fuel for commercial nuclear power plants. The following report details USEC’s opportunity to embark on a massive capital-expenditure project known as the American Centrifuge Project (ACP). Currently‚
Premium Net present value Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Weighted average cost of capital
Case 3: Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES Question 1 Explain and comment on the capital budgeting method used historically by AES. Is there a need for change? Explain. Question 2 If Venerus implements the suggested methodology‚ what will be the adjusted discount rate for the Red Oak project (USA) and the Lal Plr project (Pakistan)? Question 3 Calculate the effect that a revision of its cost of capital will have on the Lal Plr project’s NPV. Comment on the
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Net present value
Shweta Singh Corporate Finance Case 2 Stryker Corporation: In-sourcing PCBs 1. State the Business Case for #3 Option# 3 has several benefits that make it the most viable option of all. Here are the following benefits: * This option promises a higher degree of control over quality and delivery. These developments will help reduce the logistic losses. * The initial expenditure (manufacturing costs) will be tax deductible‚ enabling Stryker
Premium Net present value Finance Cost
Memorandum To: CEO‚ Ocean Carriers Re: Ocean Carriers Capital Budgeting Mary Linn‚ Vice President of Finance‚ has been approached by a potential customer with a proposed lease of a ship for a three-year period‚ beginning in early 2003. The terms are very attractive but we currently do not have a ship that meets this customer’s needs. Ms. Linn has asked Group 4 to research three proposed scenarios to determine whether or not commissioning a new capesize carrier for this customer will
Premium Net present value Cash flow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Case Study #1: Green Valley Medical AEM 4570: Advanced Corporate Finance Name: Di Hu Net ID: dh583 1. What are the key elements of Green Valley’s strategy? a. What kind of hospital is it‚ and how does that relate to their overall strategy? Green Valley Medical Center is a nonprofit teaching hospital comprising of 330 beds affiliated with a large state university in a midsize town located several hours from the state’s two urban centers. It was the only regional hospital
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
Flow Analysis Cash flow analysis on Exhibit 1 represents net cash flow calculation using the base assumption. According to this calculation‚ Nucor would have net present value of $(11.99) million which is a negative value. This negative value on NPV indicates potential unprofitable consequences after implementing SMS’s compact strip production (CSP); therefore‚ Nucor should not invest in this new technology. Scenario Analysis Instead of using the given assumptions‚ I have set two alternatives
Premium Net present value Cash flow
government owned plants which usually comes with its own restrictions. We will be calculating the individual cash flows of its existing Paducah operations and the ACP project it is planning to invest in. Our decision will be based on the incremental NPV and IRR. This report will walk us through all the important aspects of our analysis and ultimately to our final decision of whether accepting or rejecting the project. Background USEC is pursuing ACP for several reasons‚ most of which can be
Premium Net present value Weighted average cost of capital Internal rate of return
Wdebt = proportion of debt in a market- value capital structure rd = pretax cost of debt capital tc = marginal effective corporate tax rate Wequity = proportion of equity in a market-value capital structure re = cost of equity capital We know from the case that: Tc = 35% Rf = 0.85% Wdebt = 44646/129686= 0.344% Wequity = 85040/129686= 0.656% From Exhibit 11‚ rd is calculated as below which is 5.335% |Debt amount |Price |Market value |YTM |Weighted YTM | |202 |106.175 |214.474 |3.911%
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Investment Net present value
Bus M 401 Dixon Case Estimate of WACC for Collinsville Plant The WACC for Collinsville‚ according to our estimations‚ came up to about 16.22% (Exhibit I). We took the average of the unlevered betas of comparable companies‚ 0.91‚ and relevered it according to Dixon’s target capital structure. Dixon’s 5-year historical debt ratio was 27.5%‚ but this approach would not be reliable due to its steep downturn debt ratio from 51% in 1975 to 6% in 1979. Thus‚ we thought that the best estimate of the
Premium Depreciation Discounted cash flow Corporate finance