Collaboration and Peer Reviews Reflective Journal 3 One major advantage of collaborating on a project is that working with a group can infuse a project with a rich array of perspectives. Another advantage is it makes the project more time effective because you have a group and you can assign different tasks to each member. A disadvantage of collaborating is that you are dealing with a lot of different personalities that can sometimes clash. Another disadvantage would be some members may be
Premium Collaboration Education Psychology
David Kennedy CHE 235 Lab 10/30/14 Scale-up Synthesis and Characterization of Butyl 2-Cyano-3-(3‚5-dichloro-phenyl)-2-propenoate‚ TSE Project #131 Introduction: This report describes the steps taken to create the scale-up of targeted trisubstituted ethylene‚ Butyl 2-Cyano-3-(3‚5-dichloro-phenyl)-2-propenoate compound (#131)‚ and also the characterization methods deployed to the results. This report serves as a critical step in the overall objective of the project; the synthesis of the copolymer
Premium 3rd millennium Stoichiometry Chemical reaction
Employee Performance Evaluation Name Job Title Employee Number Effective evaluation of job performance is an on-going process. Annually each manager or supervisor provides a summary of progress toward meeting job expectations and last year’s goals. This form is to be used for annual evaluations‚ and at other times during the year when formal feedback is needed. Evaluation Period (month/day/year) From: To: Evaluation Criteria - Describes
Premium Evaluation Critical thinking Problem solving
vision to be forward thinking in what and how they teach and research; the graduates they produce; and how they innovate. Site Overview: Evaluation Criteria (7C’s of Framework): NOTE: The ratings in the above questionnaire is a range of (0-5) where 0 being No and 5 being Maximum or Yes. A. ORIGIN -What is the website’s origin? | Rating | The organisation providing the site is clearly indicated. | 5 | There is information about the
Premium Color Website Sarawak
Adolescent Peer Pressure Between the ages of twelve and nineteen is a period in a teenager ’s life that determines what kind of adult he or she will become. This period of adolescence‚ also known as the "formative years"‚ is the subject of much study and research to determine why adolescents are vulnerable to the phenomenon called peer pressure. The disturbing number of incidents of teenage drug use‚ teenage pregnancy and teenage suicide is most assuredly the reason that fuels the need
Premium Adolescence
Formative Evaluation and Summative Evaluation There are two forms of evaluation that can best serve the purpose of evaluating the teaching-learning process. The first is formative evaluation which is done during the period of instruction. It provides information on what students are learning in terms of specific objectives. The second is summative evaluation which is done after instruction. It provides information on what the students have learned in terms of general objectives. The difference between
Premium Evaluation methods Evaluation Assessment
ABSTRACT Prospective student teachers were required to choose a curriculum document from either the primary or secondary school sector for evaluation. They were required to conduct such an evaluation using the Daniel Stufflebeam’s CIPP (Context‚ Input‚ Process and Product) Model. The CIPP Model would be used to determine the usefulness of the curriculum in meeting the needs of the Trinidad and Tobago society. Based on possible weaknesses found in the document‚ prospective teachers were to
Premium Education Curriculum
A literature review is important for finding and evaluating peer-reviewed sources for writing a research paper. “Peer-review is the act of carefully evaluating a work by one or more experts of the same field of work‚ to determine its credibility‚ research methodology‚ accuracy‚ and relevance to the literature” (Camtasia Studio 8‚ 2014). Using sources that are peer-reviewed is important because “culturally proficient research practices are necessary to dispel destructive myths and stereotypes” and
Premium Sociology Social work Research
Poster Assessment Evaluation Name on student poster: XXXXXX Poster title: “Is long acting risperidone injection more beneficial in treating the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia than oral atypical antipsychotics? A systematic review” The structure of the poster was well organised and easy to follow. The introduction‚ method‚ results and conclusion headers were all in bold and key points could be seen from a two metre distance as they were in bold also. The poster focused on the
Premium Antipsychotic Schizophrenia
CURRICULUM EVALUATION DEFINITION OF EVALUATION Curriculum evaluation is a systematic process of determining whether the curriculum as designed and implemented has produced or is producing the intended and desired results. It is the means of determining whether the program is meeting its goals‚ that is whether the measures / outcomes for a given set of instructional inputs match the intended or pre-specified outcomes. (Tuckman‚ 1979) Types of Evaluation 1. Humanistic approach – goal free
Premium High school Education Secondary education