RNFA.ORG The website I chose to review was RNFA.org. I chose this website because I am interested in perioperative nursing as a future career choice. RNFA.org is an informational website that is all about how to become a first assistant in surgery. An RNFA is an advanced practice perioperative nurse who is also an experienced professional in the operating room setting. This website is geared towards the educational process behind becoming an RNFA. RNFA.org specifically uses NIFA-National Institute
Premium Education
Research Critique of “African American Women’s Experience of Infection With HIV in the Rural Southeastern United States” October 15‚ 2012 This essay is a critique of qualitative nursing research. In it I will review the research article African American Women’s Experience of Infection with HIV in the Rural Southeastern United States. The article is written by Mallory‚ who is an associate professor at Mennonite College of Nursing‚ Illinois State University (Mallory‚ 2008). In her article Mallory
Free Qualitative research
Part 1‚ Research Critique Nithin Mathew Nursing Research NRS 429 v February 03‚ 2012 Introduction . The critical appraisal in research widens understanding‚ provide a back ground for the study and improve practice. The qualitative studies in critical appraisal include logic conclusions; assess significance and the consistency
Premium Lung cancer Smoking cessation Tobacco smoking
Discuss whether nursing is a profession or an occupation. What can current and future nurses do to enhance nursing’s standing as a profession? Nursing is a profession. According to McEwen and Wills (2014) “profession is a learned vocation or occupation that has a status of superiority and precedence within a division of work” (p. 2). I believe this describes nursing but needed more evidence to make my decision. I considered the “characteristics of a profession: a defined and specialized knowledge
Premium Nursing Nursing practice Dictionary
Article Critique of Nursing Research 1 Problem Statement/Purpose 1 Literature Review 2 Limitations of the Study 2 Hypothesis/Research Question 3 Operational Definitions/Definition of Terms 4 Research Design 5 Setting‚ Population and Sample 5 Data Collection Methods/Instruments 6 Data Analysis‚ Findings‚ Implications‚ & Recommendations 7 References 8 Quantitative Article Critique of Nursing Research
Premium Atherosclerosis
University of Santo Tomas College of Nursing A Nursing Research Critique By Kevin Royce G. Ang McGrath‚ M.‚ Lyng‚ C.‚ & Hourican‚ S. (2012‚ September). From the simulation lab to the ward: Preparing 4th year nursing students for the role of staff nurse. Clinical Simulation in Nursing‚ 8(7)‚ e265-e272. The length of the title of the study is important. According to Connell Meehan (1999)‚ the title should be between 10 and 15 words long and should clearly identify for the reader the purpose
Premium Nursing Nurse
References: Graham Gibbs (1998) Gibbs reflective cycle. Bulman .C and Schulz’s(2004)(Eds)Reflective Practice in Nursing O’Carrol&Park (2007) Essential Mental Health Nursing skills .Mosby Elseir NMC(2004)The code; Standard of coduct‚performance and ethics for Nurses and Midwives Department of health (2009).The Nursing Roadmap for Quality. J Rycroft-Malone Hervey‚ K Seers-Journal of clinical (2004) an exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of
Premium Health care provider Nursing Leadership
Abstract The purpose of this paper was to critique a research paper that explored the experiences and attitudes of mental health nursing students towards using cigarettes as a means of controlling client behavior. A survey was used with the information broken down into graphs. Overall‚ the data showed that the respondents generally did not like this practice. There were both ethical and moral dilemmas involved using lifestyle risk factors as rewards or a patient’s addiction as a way of modifying
Premium Nursing Psychiatry Health
Critiquing a research article Gill Marshall) Division of Medical Imaging Sciences‚ St. Martin’s College‚ Lancaster LA1 3JD‚ UK Accepted 16 September 2004 Available online 1 December 2004 KEYWORDS Critical reading; Peer review; Literature; Journal review Abstract This article explores certain concepts relating to critiquing research papers. These include considering the peer review process for publication‚ demonstrating the need for critiquing‚ providing a way to carefully evaluate research papers
Premium Academic publishing Peer review Scientific method
can reduce the incidence of urinary catheterization‚ and consequently this will enhance the patients’ safety. Critique Part 1 Research Questions or Hypotheses The background and significance of this study are properly presented in the introduction. The research question is presented at the end of the introduction of this article. Saint et al. (2005) develop the research question based on the scientific backgrounds they selected and reviewed: “Is a urinary catheter reminder effective
Premium Urinary catheterization Urinary tract infection Catheter