one of the most used arguments for Affirmative Action‚ there are two objections to this argument; the practical objection and the principled objection. The practical objection questions whether or not the diversity argument is effective. The practical objection says that Affirmative Action will damage the self-esteem of minority students and will cause white groups to feel that they should get a break. The principled objection says using race as a factor in admissions is unfair because it violates
Premium Affirmative action Minority group Black people
Section 1129(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that each holder of an impaired allowed claim or interest either (1) accept the plan of reorganization or (2) receive or retain under the plan property of a value‚ as of the effective date‚ that is not less than the value such holder would receive or retain under the plan or reorganization if the applicable debtor were liquidated under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on the effective date. This is referred to as the “best interests” test. To make
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Debt
After presenting his objections‚ God confirmed Jeremiah in his mission. The confirmation in Jer 1: 7-8 has may components. God reject Jeremiah’s objections by saying: “Do not say‚ I am only a boy” (Jer 1:7). In other words‚ the arguments given by Jeremiah to avoid his mission to be a prophet were insufficient. Jeremiah’s mission becomes more explicit. The Lord says to Jeremiah: “for you shall go to all to whom I send you‚ and you shall speak whatever I command you” (Jer 1: 7). Walter Vogels‚ P.B
Premium Jesus God New Testament
it is wrong. Whatever God says is valuable to that individual. An objection to this theory would be the argument of different religious views. If an individual was Muslim and another was Christian‚ the Muslim would argue that the command of God isn’t morally correct because he doesn’t believe in God. Whereas‚ the Christian believe feels as though the command of God is morally correct because he does believe in God. Another objection to this rule would be that only God can determine whether
Premium God Morality Divine command theory
Eliminative Materialism is a theory that deems that the common sense understanding of the mind is wrong. It also poses that one day neurosciences will reveal that mental states do not refer to anything real. In fact‚ the concept of mental states will eventually be eliminated by neuroscience. In the past‚ mental states were explained by what is called folk psychology. Churchland argues that folk psychology will gradually be replaced as neuroscience grows more advanced and explains more. The problems
Free Philosophy of mind Mind Dualism
premises. I will consider an objection towards Anselm’s definition of God and show that it is unconvincing and flawed. The objection against Anselm’s ontological argument that I will consider will be one brought up by a contemporary of Anselm‚ Gauinilo. His objection was that if you were to take Anselm’s logic of existence then you can infer anything into existence (essentially parallel arguments). I shall consider Anselm’s response as well as my response to the objection. I will conclude that Anselm’s
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
“Affirmative Action: An Ethical Evaluation”. In this paper he presents four objections people have to why affirmative action is wrong and then gives reasons as to why these objections are not valid. In this paper‚ I will first discuss what affirmative action is‚ then Shaw’s point argument against “the objection of unfair burden on present generation of white workers” (Shaw 766). Following this‚ I will articulate an objection to Shaw’s argument‚ regarding how white males endorse past discrimination
Premium Affirmative action Discrimination
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. vs. M/s. L.K. Ahuja & Co. In respect of certain contracts of work assigned by the appellant certain disputes having been arisen‚ the matter was referred to arbitration. Two awards were made and the same were filed in the court of the Civil Judge in two Title (Arbitration) Suits Nos. 37/86 and 40/86. By a common order‚ the trial court made the awards rule of court in entirety and decrees were drawn in terms thereof. An appeal was filed against the said common order before
Premium Arbitration Court Arbitral tribunal
the distinctness of brain states of mental states. Mary‚ who is a materialist‚ presents several objections to that argument. Her main objection corresponds to the first/third-person approach. She believes that Dave presents that argument only from the first-person approach‚ which is introspection‚ and totally disregards the third-person approach‚ which is observation of another mind. Mary’s objections will follow by the Dave’s response on them from the dualist’s point of view. The purpose of the
Premium Mind Cognition Dualism
Choose either utilitarian or deontological ethical theory to apply to the ethical question. Explain the core principles of that theory. Demonstrate how the principles of the theory support a certain position on that question. Articulate a relevant objection to the theory on the basis of that argument. Instructions Write a five paragraph essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be 600 to 900 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style
Premium Writing Ethics Morality