therefore lack of suffering? This are only a few of the many questions philosopher Peter Singer poses in Animal Liberation‚ his review of Animals‚ Men‚ and Morals in which he argues that animals are no less human they we are and we will (or should) come to see animals just as we came to see (though are still struggling to) African Americans and women as equals to white men. What readers may find curious is that Singer is not only arguing for a halt of animal mistreatment‚ but is arguing not only that
Premium
a personal level. Peter Singer‚ most notable for his authorship of “Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality” and the drowning child analogy‚ presents the rather uncommon normative view that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate more resources to humanitarian causes than the present standard. Singer’s perspective on these seemingly radical moral ideals are confronted by many a pragmatic objection‚ ranging from entitlement principles to moral inequalities. Nevertheless‚ Singer builds his argumentative
Premium Poverty Economics Wealth
objectification. Speciesism cannot survive without lies‚ and standard English usage supplies these lies in abundance. “Speciesism” was coined by psychologist Richard Ryder in the 1970s‚ but philosopher Peter Singer’s work has done the most to popularize the term. In his seminal book‚ Animal Liberation‚ Singer defines speciesism as an “attitude of bias toward the interests of members of one’s own
Premium Human Mammal Animal rights
In "Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality" Peter Singer argues that affluent individuals‚ in fact‚ almost all of us are living deeply immoral lives by not contributing to the relief and prevention of famine. The causes of famine are various and include human wrongdoing‚ but this doesn’t matter‚ according to Singer. What matters is that each of us can minimize the effects of the famines that are now occurring and can take steps to prevent those that might occur. As we go about our daily business‚ living
Premium Famine Ethics Morality
Anacely Gallardo HUM 190 DeCoster 15 December 2014 Peter Singer‚ a well know philosopher‚ notes that “A liberation movement demands an expansion of our moral horizons and an extension or reinterpretation of the basic moral principle of equality.” We‚ humans‚ think that we are superior to others‚ not only to other humans‚ but to other species as well. As the superior race we think we are‚ we tend to use and manipulate animals to our convenience. We play with them and we use them as the subjects in
Premium Human Morality Mammal
projects and interests in order to save one’s life‚ say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality”‚ also in “ the life you can save”‚ Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer‚ Giving‚ sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction‚ it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises
Premium Poverty Malnutrition Famine
(Ed.)‚ The Morality and Global Justice Reader (103-126). Boulder‚ CO: Westview Press. Lillehammer‚ H. (2011). Consequentialism and global ethics. In M. Boylan (Ed.)‚ The Morality and Global Justice Reader (89-102). Boulder‚ CO: Westview Press. Singer‚ P. (1972). Famine‚ affluence‚ and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs‚ 1(1)‚ 229-243.
Premium Ethics Morality Human rights
Environmental Ethics: Singer vs Regan Environmental ethics is defined: as a part of philosophy which considers extending the traditional boundaries of ethics from solely including humans to including the nonhuman world (Wikipedia). For example‚ this includes the preservation of plants and an increase of animal rights. Peter Singer and Tom Regan both argue that animals need a greater voice than their own in the debate of ethical treatment. Despite their very different philosophical views‚ Singer and Regan want
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
Sagarika Reddy Philosophy Honors 03/28/16 Dr. Shorter Speciesism and Moral Status In his work Speciesism and Moral Status‚ Peter Singer compares the behaviors of humans with cognitive disabilities to the behaviors of nonhuman animals. He argues that all human beings do not have cognitive abilities that exceed that of all nonhuman animals. In fact‚ many nonhuman animals have cognitive abilities that surpass the cognitive abilities of human beings with severe mental retardation. Through his argument
Premium Religion God Morality
article “Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality“‚ Peter Singer says that humans have an obligation to the poor and starving; based on the assumption that suffering and starvation is bad. The assumption‚ that there is something morally wrong with having human beings starved to death should make one question whether they have a duty to the poor. Peter examines whether an affluent society like ours has any moral obligation to the poor in this world. In the article Peter said "India needs a minimum of $300‚000
Premium Poverty Ethics Famine