Class Discussion of Samsung and Theme Park Industry Case Reading: Case: Samsung Case. Key activities of the class: 1. Group presentations of the industry analysis (3 minutes per group; use the worksheet) 2. Class discussion of the Case: Key issue: As the chairperson of the Samsung Group‚ would you approve the master plan proposed? (Please refer to Case Summary on Web). 3. Video: Samsung Everland Fall 2000 MGTO321 (L1 & L2) -- Dr. JT Li 1 Outline of Class Discussion: Samsung Case 1. Global Context:
Premium Management Samsung Group Strategic management
Samsung vs. Apple Samsung is the apple of American smartphone buyers’ eyes. The winner in the U.S. smartphone market is no longer Apple. In May‚ A survey conclusion is that Samsung’s Galaxy S4‚ Galaxy Note II and Galaxy S III sold more combined in the U.S. than did Apple’s iPhone. For example‚ the results of this report suggest that Samsung is good at flooding the market with products in between Apple’s predictable new product introductions each fall. Apple has predictably introduced a real
Premium Smartphone
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY A mobile phone (also called mobile‚ cellular telephone‚ or cell phone) is an electronic device used for two-way radio telecommunication over a cellular network of base stations known as cell sites. Mobile phones differ from cordless telephones‚ which only offer telephone service within limited range through a single base station attached to a fixed land line‚ for example within a home or an office. Today‚ cell phones are the most popular tool for communication
Premium Mobile phone
►Samsung • Assessing the opportunity and the Situation - Understanding the situation ►What was Samsung’s financial situation like? Samsung was experiencing a steep financial setback ►Who was responsible for Samsung’s situation? China was able to put cheaper products on the market ►Describe Samsung’s ‘cost-driven competitive strategy’ until the mid-1990: Samsung produced technical components for firms with better-known brands Samsung sold me-too consumer products ►What did Samsung need to
Premium Innovation Product management Marketing
superiority of Samsung over its competitors exceeded 51 per cent! The cost advantages related to raw materials may be explained by better negotiated agreements with suppliers (perhaps due to the larger volumes of purchases – comp. Fig. 5) and possibly less shipping and distribution costs that stem from the fact that Samsung’s fab facilities are geographically collocated (while competitors’ facilities are spread world-wide). In terms of labour productivity only Chinese SMIC outperformed Samsung‚ but that
Premium Cost Costs China
service possible." Employees also call it the wow statement and has been the key factor for Zappos.com quick success in a global scale. This mission statement has helped with employee retention because the company goes through many steps to find objective based employees which clearly fit the company ’s profile. They do mention that they have left behind very talented people who were not fitted with the company ’s profile. Every employee goes through two interviews‚ one from management and one from
Premium Customer service Customer Sales
How does Big Data disrupt the technology ecosystem of the public cloud? Copyright 2012 IDC. Reproduction is forbidden unless authorized. All rights reserved. Agenda Market trends 2020 Vision Introduce panel members and theme © 2012 IDC Source:/Notes: 2 Market Drivers of Big Data Billions of devices‚ millions of apps‚ drives data explosion Heterogeneous systems and architectures Real time computing and decision making-analytics Cloud bridges consumer and enterprise markets
Premium Cloud computing Data management
Summery Samsung Electronics has proven to the business world that they are one of the mostprestigious technology companies in the industry. With more technology advancements thanour market can handle at this point and time‚ Samsung has paved the way for the future inelectronics. One of the most popular new “toys” in the market today‚ is the unbelievable 3D TV.The first 3D TV was launched in March of 2010‚ and has already had a major impact on themarket. With the release earlier this year‚ Samsung dominated
Premium Future Advertising Competitor analysis
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0309-0566.htm EJM 44‚7/8 Consumer responses to brand extensions: a comprehensive model ´ ´ Eva Martınez and Jose M. Pina ´ Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Empresariales‚ The University of Zaragoza‚ Zaragoza‚ Spain Abstract Purpose – This paper aims to understand the reciprocal spill-over effects of brand extensions by testing a comprehensive model that gathers both the brand extension evaluation
Premium Branding Brand equity Brand
Information 2 Vodafone 2 Samsung 2 Capital Structure Analysis 2 Vodafone & Samsung Results 3 Liquidity analysis 3 Financial Leverage Ratios 3 Possible changes in Capital Structure – Vodafone 4 Possible changes in Capital Structure – Samsung 4 Capital Structure Finance Theories 4 Modigliani and Miller Irrelevancy Theory 4 Pecking Order Theory 4 Trade-off Theory 4 Clientele Effect 5 Traditional View & Shareholders Wealth 5 Vodafone 5 Samsung 5 Bankruptcy Prediction
Premium Financial ratio Finance Corporate finance