General Certificate of Secondary Education January 2011 Sociology 41902 Unit 2 Monday 31 January 2011 1.30 pm to 3.00 pm For this paper you must have: an AQA 12-page answer book. Time allowed 1 hour 30 minutes Instructions Use black ink or black ball-point pen. Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Examining Body for this paper is AQA. The Paper Reference is 41902. This paper is divided into four Topic Areas. Answer three Topics
Premium Social class Sociology Mass media
Throughout the course of the year our brains have been filled with various literary works. We have read short stories and plays that have not been accustomed too. You know things from the 18th century or readings from the slave-like time periods. Besides all of that though‚ we have learned a great deal about Character‚ Quality‚ Values and Life in a broader more mature point of view. As reading the play “Antigone” we were exposed to the closed mindedness of Creon (Antigone’s Uncle; King
Premium Short story Fiction Oedipus
DYJR7EAdvertisements of Bilateral Contracts Are Not Usually Offers Case Coelho Vs The Public Services Commission 1. Brief Facts/ Case Summary The applicant‚ Mr Meredith Coelho was a health inspector under the town Board Tanjung Malim and he applied for the post of Assistant Passport Officer in the Federation of Malaya Government Oversea Missions as advertised in the Malay Mail newspaper dated 1957. The terms and conditions of the selection are as stated below: * Serving Assistant passport
Premium Contract
The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means‚ or — Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email? Eliza Mik* The ‘traditional’ classification into ‘instantaneous’ and ‘non-instantaneous’ methods of communication must be abandoned. As all Internet transmissions are instantaneous‚ the choice between the principle of receipt and the postal exception must be based on other criteria. The focus must be shifted from communication devices to the characteristics of the communication
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Communication
Distinguish between offer & invitation to treat. An offer is a definite promise to be bound provided that certain terms are to be accepted. The Contracts Act 1950 uses the term ‘proposal’ but it has the same meaning as an ‘offer. Section 2(a) defines a proposal as ‘when a person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything‚ with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to the act or abstinence‚ he is said to make a proposal. An invitation to treat is a statement
Premium Contract Invitation to treat
idem in a legal relation. An offer is a necessary element that must present for a legally binding contract to be in place. An offer and an invitation to treat are two different aspects. An invitation to treat is defined as an action inviting other parties to make an offer to form a contract‚ whereas an offer is an expression made by offeror to offeree communicating the offeror’s willingness to perform a promise. The distinction is important because accepting an offer creates a binding contract
Premium Contract
In a letter dated March 31‚ 1776‚ Abigail Adams requests his husband John Adams not to forget about the women’s rights in the Continental Congress and in the fight for American’s Independence from Great Britain. This piece of text belongs to a series of letters Abigail Adams and John Adams wrote to each other while they were separated between 1762 and 1801. This correspondence of over 1000 letters remains in the Massachusetts Historical Society. Those letters‚ “Remember the Ladies” letter included
Premium John Adams John Adams John Quincy Adams
There are many models have been developed to understand the factors affecting the acceptance of computer technology such as Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) (Fishbein & Ajzen‚ 1975‚ Ajzen & Fishbein‚ 1980)‚ Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen‚ 1985‚ 1991)‚ Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis‚ 1989)‚ Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior (DTPB) (Taylor & Todd‚ 1995)‚ and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) (Venkatesh et al.‚ 2003). TRA proposes that individual
Premium Theory of planned behavior Theory of reasoned action Behavior
Do the courts always rigorously apply the established rules of offer and acceptance governing the formation of contracts? Put bluntly‚ no‚ the courts do not always rigorously apply the established rules of offer and acceptance governing the formation of contracts. Judgments by Lord Denning in Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corporation Ltd (1979) and Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979) have challenged this ‘mirror image’ approach. Nonetheless‚ these are very much exceptions to the general
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
Offer and acceptance is one the main 7 essentials to create a legally binding contract since a contract is based on agreement. It is also an essential for a court to arbitrate problems. An offer is a manifestation (orally‚ in writing‚ or by conduct) of willingness to enter into bargain‚ which justifies another person’s understanding of assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude the transaction. An Offeror is the party who makes the offer. An offeree is the party who receives the offer and
Premium Contract Invitation to treat Offer and acceptance