Justices deny review over students’ religious messages in classroom By Bill Mears‚ CNN Supreme Court Producer updated 3:41 PM EDT‚ Mon June 11‚ 2012 STORY HIGHLIGHTS Washington (CNN) -- In what have become known as the "Jesus pencil" and "candy cane" cases‚ the Supreme Court refused Monday to consider appeals from the families of elementary school students over distribution of religious-themed gifts on campus. At issue was whether school officials can be sued for violating the First Amendment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
In 1989 the first drug court was introduced in Miami Dade County‚ Florida. Drug problems in Florida were substantial and mirrored many states across the United States. Crack Cocaine was on the rise as so was the crime across the United States. The many types of drug courts have been put in place to decrease recidivism‚ drug use and restore lives and families. Drug Courts are designed to serve as the alternative for incarceration. A big factor in criminal justice is figuring out what programs work
Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminology
due to drug related crimes. The need to address this growing problem led to the drug court movement and the creation of drug courts. Drug courts are special courts that treat offenders with a history of substance abuse addictions by providing supervised treatments and sanctions when needed. This paper will discuss the establishment and goals of drug courts. It will also discuss the success or failures of drug courts in California‚ Florida‚ and D.C. Early efforts to meet the nation’s growing drug problem
Premium
Today’s society has been largely impacted from cases years ago‚ these cases changed many peoples’ lives. Before there was equality‚ there were arguments almost everyday regarding segregation and racism. To emphasize‚ some disagreements had to be settled by the Supreme Court‚ and the ruling made still have a lasting effect today. The Supreme Court has made many ruling effecting civil rights: Plessy vs. Ferguson‚ Brown vs. Board of Education‚ and Loving vs. Virginia. In Plessy vs. Ferguson‚ the Court’s
Premium African American Black people Race
Would it be to the advantage of the taxpayer and the juveniles to split the juvenile courts into two sections? Explain in detail why or why not. There would a lot of people favorable circumstances of the taxpaying and the juveniles with part those adolescent courts under two areas since it will profit taxpaying and juveniles by Part under segments. Toward finishing that status wrongdoers will get a greater amount help What’s more treat similarly as a minor wrongdoing offender‚ which they don’t
Premium Crime Criminology Criminal justice
1. A professional court reporter has the ability to write about 300 words per minute and that too by hand. At times you may notice that they actually can write faster than what you speak. 2. The role of a court reporter is very crucial as it requires the maintenance of records in written form for all legal proceedings. This is a profession which has been there since earlier times. 3. The requirements of a court reporter are not just limited to the courtrooms. There are a lot of other tasks outside
Premium Marketing Customer service Customer
In the case study presented we will learn about the Helton family travel plans and the tragedy they endured by having their trailer stolen right across the street from their accommodations. You will also learn how the Fairfield Inn motel decided to deal with security measures in order to save their profits. Travel Plans The Helton family who is use to traveling on weekends checked into the Fairfield Inn motel. The family was towing a trailer containing a drag racing car‚ golf cart‚ racing
Premium English-language films Law Hotel
Supreme Court Case CJA/354 Supreme Court Case The discovery of unethical billing alongside unethical accounting practices provoked a chain reaction towards a hospital accountant by the name of Rehberg. An accountant trying to serve justice was entangled in a web of lies. Rehberg vs. Paulk is a very interesting Supreme Court case. Rehberg vs. Paulk embodied much of the injustice that is not presented to the public when sworn officials break the very laws that are supposed to be
Premium Jury Criminal law Law
Does notoriety affect the outcome of a criminal court proceeding? A trial’s outcome should not be based on the notoriety of it‚ yet it is. Due to media coverage‚ the length of the trial‚ and the notoriety of the people who committed the crime‚ the outcome of the trial is affected. The Manson trials and the trial of Leopold and Loeb are two prime example of how notoriety can affect a criminal court proceeding. An analysis of two criminal court proceedings‚ the Manson trial and the trial of Leopold
Premium Murder Crime Serial killer
given a life sentence. This man described‚ who was once a child delinquent‚ is like many other children in America who faced the same fate. Since the very first court case of a child murderer‚ the debate of whether children should be tried as adults has been a raging discussion. Joshua Phillips’ story is one that stands out among many cases of children tried as adults. It was November 3rd‚ 1998‚ in Jacksonville‚ Florida when 14-year-old Phillips was out in his front
Premium Crime Juvenile delinquency Criminology