1. Hearsay evidence rule in Malaysia The general hearsay rule is that a statement made by a person not called as a witness is inadmissible to prove the truth of the facts stated and extends to oral evidence as to statements in documents.1 Where oral evidence is relied on‚ it must be direct in all cases.2 Section 603 has thus codified the rule against hearsay evidence. “Hearsay” does not mean that no witness can be allowed to depose anything which he has heard said by anyone else.4 It is secondary
Premium Evidence law Common law
Value and Preservation of Evidence Kaplan University CJ370-01 January 16‚ 2012 The value of footprint or footwear evidence is heavily important. The most valuable details are signs of wear‚ characteristic fittings or marks of fittings that have come off‚ injuries‚ marks of nails and pegs‚ especially when these are irregularly placed‚ and repair marks. If they are particularly characteristic or occur in sufficient numbers‚ such details may form decisive evidence. In the interest of thoroughness
Premium Forensic evidence Shoe Foot
Queen.” Davidson discusses the importance of working collaboratively. Johnson explores different systems and the interactions within them. The system is made of many individuals that need to communicate to solve certain problems. Both authors discuss the hierarchies and how it limits individuals from collectively working together. Without a hierarchy‚ interactions between individuals allow for them to solve problems. The two authors present individuals working together. Davidson shows this with the iPod
Premium Education Psychology Sociology
a forensic laboratory for confirmatory chemical analysis before the case can be adjudicated in court; (4) the advent of DNA profiling. 2. Describe the criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. United States. The court ruled that in order to be admitted as evidence at trail‚ the questioned procedure technique‚ or principles must be “generally accepted” by a meaningful segment of relevant scientific community. This approach requires the proponent of scientific
Premium Evidence law United States Scientific method
Our text indicated there are three major categories of evidence can be documentary evidence including electronic data (i.e. would be bank statements‚ any written confirmation from vendors/customers‚ emails‚ invoices‚ etc.) physical evidence (inventory count‚ fixed asset verification‚ etc.) Statements of witnesses/parties involved. Having statements or witness is a good thing as proof i.e. would be a car accident. Should you need to go to court for damage’s or medical whatever the case maybe‚ having
Premium Law Crime Police
Allen Wrench The "Allen screw" name for the socket head cap screw and "Allen key" for the wrench originate from the products of the Allen Manufacturing Company of Hartford‚ Connecticut. According to Bates‚ it is widely reported that the company trademarked the name "Allen wrench or key" for its range of hex wrenches in 1943. The Allen wrench trademark of the Allen Manufacturing Company was taken out in 1943‚ Allen became such a successful brand of hex key that many consumers in following decades
Premium Screw
Digital Evidence Darlene Sampson Digital Evidence January 8‚ 2012 Abstract This paper will help explain the basic understanding of computer forensics. I will also identify five areas in computers and computer application a forensic investigator can look for digital evidence. I will identify three types of criminal investigations that can utilize the services of computer forensic investigators. This paper will help with the understanding of computer forensics. Digital Evidence What
Premium Internet Computer Access control
WORKING WITH PEOPLE OR WORKING WITH MACHINES Based on the matter of working partners‚ generally different people have different favorite kinds of occupations. Some people prefer occupations in which they work primarily with machines. Others choose professions in which they work with people. Each of the two types has its own advantages‚ and which one suits a person best depends on his personalities and fields of professions. Personally I would prefer working with machines‚ for I enjoy the feeling
Premium Preference Motivation Consumer theory
statements by Blair fall under an exception to the hearsay rule‚ Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(3)‚ which provides that when a declarant is unavailable as a witness‚ statements against interest are not excluded by hearsay. When a prosecutor seeks to introduce evidence of a statement that inculpates the accused‚ a number of courts require that statement be against the declarants interest and that there be corroboration. Factors that courts look at for corroboration include motive‚ general character of the declarant
Premium Evidence law
Please explain the Frye Standard. 1. The Frye Standard is a standard used to determine the admissibility of an expert’s scientific testimony. A court in which applies the Frye Standard must determine whether or not the method which the evidence was obtained was generally accepted by experts in the field in which it belongs. When did this standard come into effect and why? 2. The Frye Standard came out of a 1923 legal decision (Frye V United States). It was a case discussing the
Premium Evidence law Daubert standard Jury