[键入公司名称] | Report | Dynamic Hedging and Implied Volatility | | sony | | | Part I Dynamic Hedging 1. Basic Information Company | 3M Co. (MMM) | Two different options to mimic | 1) X=87.5 call option‚ expiring at Nov 16‚ 2012. 2) X=90 call option‚ expiring at Nov 16‚ 2012. | 2. Calculate the annualized standard deviation: σ=0.1357502 Completed calculation table (See Appendix) 3. Replicating Portfolios X=87.5 call option Completed calculation table
Premium Option
Unit Plan Template |Unit Author | |First and Last Name |Dela Cerna‚ Jay Hane and Ulay‚ Marian Jacquiline | |School District |MALITA District |
Premium Organism Eukaryote Cell wall
firm manage foreign exchange exposures? The case examines transactional and translational exposures and alternative responses to these exposures by analyzing two specific hedging decisions by General Motors. Describes General Motors’ corporate hedging policies‚ its risk management structure‚ and how accounting rules impact hedging decisions. The company is considering deviations from prescribed policies because of two significant exposures: an exposure to the Canadian dollar with adverse accounting
Premium United States dollar Corporation Risk
Coca-Cola and Pepsi Pensions Laila Nayani Professor: William Blix ACC: 305 Abstract In this paper I will cover the comparative analysis case study of the pension plans offered by the
Premium Pension Coca-Cola
foreign currencies as Euros (EUR) and British Pounds (GBP). Consequently‚ foreign exchange hedging has a crucial importance for the company because it provides protection against different types of risk that derive from its activity. In order to reduce risk‚ the company is using two hedging derivatives: forward contracts and put options to sell dollars. The aim of the paper is to determine an appropriate hedging policy which answers two main questions: how much to hedge‚ and in what proportions of
Premium Futures contract Forward contract Foreign exchange market
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT BMW: Currency Hedging 2007 BY AJAY BANSAL‚ VAIBHAV SINGH‚ VIJAY VERMA‚ TANMAY JAIN‚ LU YOU‚ SEBASTIAN DOMINITZKI Background 2 Revenue Growth in 2007: 14‚3% €56‚018 Million 1‚500‚678 BMW‚ MINI and Rolls-Royce brand cars were sold during 2007 (9.2% increased) >25% of sales take place in US Crisis in US Credit Market adverse impact on the share prices of European exporting companies BMW common stock: 2.7% drop US dollar dropped
Premium United States dollar Currency Exchange rate
Hedging in the Mining Industry Strategy‚ Control and Governance Contents Foreword Chapter 1: Executive summary Chapter 2: To hedge or not to hedge? Considering a strategy 1 2–4 5 – 12 Chapter 3: What tools are available? Implementing the hedging strategy 13 – 24 Chapter 4: How do we control and monitor a hedging programme? 25 – 36 Chapter 5: How‚ why and to whom do we communicate our risk-management strategy? 37 – 44 Chapter 6: What are the accounting implications? 45 – 49 Appendix
Premium Futures contract Forward contract
Southwest Airlines Fuel Hedging and Relations to Profitability Abstract In order to stay airborne‚ a passenger airline has to consistently generate profits. Profits come only from paying passengers‚ hence all stratagems must be customer oriented. In a scenario where there are many airlines competing with each other‚ one way of attracting passengers is to keep the cost of flying low‚ while providing value for money. On the other hand‚ expenses must tightly controlled to reach and stay at the
Premium Southwest Airlines Airline
Fuel Hedging for Delta Airlines Delta Air Lines • A major United States Airline • Results of operations are impacted by changes in • Aircraft fuel prices • Interest rates • Foreign currency exchange rates • Derivative contracts Derivative Type Hedged Risk Classification of Gains and Losses Fuel hedge contracts Interest rate contracts Foreign currency exchange contracts Increases in jet fuel prices Increases in interest rates Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates Aircraft fuel and
Premium Airline Futures contract Option
MEMORANDUM TO Mary Litton FROM Operations Team RE Evaluation of 4 Policies to Cover Aircraft Losses Background Per your request‚ we have completed an analysis of the 4 proposed policies to cover the risk of catastrophic loss and incidental damage to our aircraft fleet focusing on the following two factors: • Ensure 1st year total costs (loss and cost of insurance) do not exceed $37M • Minimize total 5 year costs (loss cost of insurance) In addition
Premium Cash flow Arithmetic mean Decision theory