Explain Anselm’s ontological argument. The ontological argument was put forth at first as a prayer by the eleventh century monk and philosopher Anselm of Canterbury. In his Proslogion‚ which means discourse‚ he presented this argument as a prayer for believers to substantiate their belief in god. Anselm uses ‘a priori’ (which means before experience) reasoning‚ which conveys that it does not rely or depend on experience and so an argument of this sort is more plausible and likely to intrigue and
Premium Ontology Ontological argument Existence
Ancient moral theory explains morality in terms that focus on the moral agent. These thinkers are interested in what constitutes‚ e.g.‚ a just person. They are concerned about the state of mind and character‚ the set of values‚ the attitudes to oneself and to others‚ and the conception of one ’s own place in the common life of a community that belong to just persons simply insofar as they are just. A modern might object that this way of proceeding is backwards. Just actions are logically prior to
Premium Plato Socrates
Archbishop of Canterbury “The Ontological Argument” claims to both prove and disprove God’s existence. However this arguments possess a certain sense of ambiguity‚ meaning that it can be interpreted in different ways and therefore come away with more than one sensible conclusion towards the existence of God. In this paper i will delve in to each argument and give reasons as to how these arguments either disprove or support a belief in God. Firstly there is that of “The Ontological Argument” a pivotal movement
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
which is the only intrinsic good. Therefore‚ Shelia’s duty should not be “actions motivated by desires/emotions are self-interested” because if they were motivated by desire they would “not deserve praise” (Garcia‚ Slide 11). Following the deontological theory in Shelia’s perspective you have to start by creating a maxim. The maxim in the situation would be‚ I will commit murder when doing so will allow me to feed my desires in order to promote my personal well-being. To check the maxim‚ we have
Premium American films English-language films KILL
Anselm’s ontological argument is a deductive argument based on an ‘a priori’ premise‚ that is‚ it is based on reason and logic rather than experience of the world. The argument attempts to prove the necessary existence of the God of Classical Theism based on Anselm’s own definition of God – which he believed to be universal. He uses this premise to conclude God’s existence‚ however‚ when examining his argument‚ it is easy to doubt much of what he said. Scholars such as Gaunilo‚ and later Aquinas
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
Critically examine how ethical theories approach issues surrounding pornography There are many ethical theories which can be applied to the ethics concerning pornography however I believe the easiest ethical theories for giving a clear cut between what is acceptable and what is not are the absolutist theories or the ones with Absolutist rules such as Kantian Ethics or Natural Moral Law. Pornography is a form of media which is sexually stimulating for the observer. The ethical situations surrounding
Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Morality
a) Explain Anselm’s ontological argument (25) Saint Anselm‚ the author of the book The Proslogian came up with what is believed to be the first formulation of the ontological argument. The writings of the ontological argument in The Proslogian were Anselm’s reflections of the passage Psalm 14:1 “Fools say in their hearts ’There is no god’” and directs his argument at the ‘fools’ From this passage. Ontology means the study of being so therefore Anselm’s argument is formulated to prove the existence
Premium Ontology Existence
tradition‚ authority‚ happiness‚ desires‚ or institutions” (Vaughn 120). Rationality should always be used when we make decisions. Kant’s ethical theory states that “right actions have moral value only if they are done with a ‘good will’ -that is‚ a well to do your duty for duty’s sake” (Vaughn 121). This is one of the main differences between Kant and Mill’s ethical theory. Mill believes that our actions are deemed moral if they can bring about the most amount of happiness among society. Kant on the other
Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Morality
Anselm’s ontological argument is a priori proof of God’s existence. Anselm begins his argument with ideas that do not depend on experience and progress to a throughly logical explanation that God necessarily exists. Anselm’s goal is to prove to the "fool" that God has to exist. He says that anyone who has an understanding of the existence of God can and logically has to believe that God really does exist. Anselm starts off with a statement that is slightly simple and straight forward;
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
Ethical Egoism is the ethical theory which states that all actions ought to be done either solely/ultimately for the sake of self interest. The criterion of rightness is what is morally right is what is good for the agent. The decision procedure would be that the agent must determine‚ in some way‚ what is good for him/her‚ and then do that. So‚ an act is right if and only if it brings the best consequences for an individual. Therefore‚ the action that is to be done is the action that is only to
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant