Examine the main strengths of the cosmological argument for the existence of God (21 marks) The main question the cosmological argument ponders thought on is ‘Why is there a universe at all?’ The cosmological argument asks the scientific question behind the universe as the design argument asks an emotional one. One of the main strengths of the cosmological argument was brought forward again recently by William Lane Craig. The argument tries to say that the world couldn’t have just occurred‚ there
Premium Existence Cosmological argument Universe
Examine some of the key principles of the argument for the existence of God based upon religious experiences Religious experiences are experiences we have of the divine or God. These experiences may be Mystical experiences‚ conversion experiences or revelatory experiences. Paul Tillich states that religious experience is a feeling of ‘ultimate concern’‚ a feeling that demands a decisive decision from the one receiving it. He describes it as an encounter followed by a special understanding of its
Premium God Existence Argument
The Argument from Religious Experience The argument from religious experience is the argument that personal religious experiences can prove God’s existence to those that have them. One can only perceive that which exists‚ and so God must exist because there are those that have experienced him. While religious experiences themselves can only constitute direct evidence of God’s existence for those fortunate enough to have them‚ the fact that there are many people who testify to having had such experiences
Premium God
nature is essential within the ontological argument and many scholars have attacked the argument on this basis. My opinion is that existence cannot be seen to be a predicate of God or a predicate of anything else either. Even if we assume that existence can be seen to be a predicate that something can have‚ I believe that the ontological argument fails in proving that existence is a predicate of God. Like Hume has argued‚ the whole basis of the ontological argument‚ especially in Descartes’ more
Premium Ontology Existence
take life as he created all humans imago dei. If someone believed this‚ they would argue that under no circumstances does anyone have the right to take their life‚ or let anyone else take their life for them. Natural law accepts the sanctity of life argument‚ but would also reject euthanasia due to the primary precept (which is absolute therefore cannot be broken under any circumstances) “preserve innocent life”. For instance‚ even in the case of Dianne Pretty who had motor neuron disease and was facing
Premium Meaning of life Universe Reality
Historically‚ most philosophers have given less written attention to the ontological and metaphysical status of children. Notably‚ Plato‚ Aristotle‚ Rousseau‚ Kant and Locke have been recognised for their contributions to an understanding of children and have given attention to the vulnerability of children and their need for protection and control‚ their duty to love and honour their parents‚ obligations of parents to care and shape their children according to some predetermined patterns. The dominant
Premium Childhood Developmental psychology Parent
convinced you that God does exist. They used one of the ten arguments listed herein. How solid are these arguments and how do they stand up to basic science and reason? Since the dawn of civilization there have been many arguments for the existence of God. Surprisingly‚ the vast majority of these arguments fall into the ten or so categories below. Not much has changed in the last 300+ years in terms of new claims or evidence. The same core arguments turn up again and again‚ often dressed in new clothes
Premium Atheism Existence God
Once a person becomes familiar with them‚ they can identify logical fallacies in others’ arguments. A person can also avoid using logical fallacies or use them to their advantage to convince others of something differentiates the facts from the fallacies‚ this could help people make a better and more productive decision To define what a fallacy is one must understand what an argument is. An argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement (a sentence
Premium Logic Argument Fallacy
9-17-13 Two forms of argument 1) Deductive= provides logically conclusive spport for the conclusion Valid-if the premises are true then the conclusion cannot be false Invalid- it fail to provide support Sound-the argument is valid and the premises are all true Unsound- an argument with true premises that lead to a false conclusion 2) Inductive-provides probable support for the conclusion Strong-premises are true conclusion is probably true cogent-premises are true argument is strong Weak-in
Premium Logic Argument
How Do I Write a Thesis Statement? What is a thesis statement? A thesis statement is a very specific argument that guides your paper. Generally‚ a thesis statement consists of two parts: 1. a clearly identifiable topic or subject matter‚ and 2. a succinct summary of what you have to say about that topic A thesis functions like the case a lawyer has to make to the judge and jury in a courtroom. An effective thesis statement explains to your reader the case you are going to make and how you are going to make it
Premium Sentence Logic Question