A defense of the ontological argument Daniel Andrews In this essay I will first explain the ontological argument and my reasons for choosing it. I will then discuss why I believe it is a better account for the existence of god than the teleological argument and the cosmological argument. I will then move onto discuss various theologians that oppose the ontological argument and critique their responses. The aim of the essay if to show the strength of the argument and to expose some key weaknesses
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Ontological argument
to be true is our reality.” -Gary Zukav If all of this is true‚ how do you perceive God? The most fascinating argument for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. The argument that God‚ being defined as most great or perfect‚ must exist‚ since a God who exists is greater than a God who does not. The ontological arguments claim that once we understand
Premium Ontology Reality Metaphysics
Unit V Case Study Luther Taylor Columbia Southern University November 06‚ 2017 Teleological Framework Advocates for moving the textile manufacturing plant from North Carolina to Southeast Asia would incorporate the teleological framework‚ because the company’s actions are morally neutral when studied apart from their consequences. Teleological framework can be described as oriented ethics‚ where the end outcomes will always justify the means. Supporters of the move from the North Carolina Plant
Premium
The Cosmological Argument The cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it. The existence of the universe‚ the argument claims‚ stands in need of explanation‚ and the only adequate explanation of its existence is that it was created by God. Like most arguments for the existence of God‚ the cosmological argument exists in several forms; two are discussed here: the temporal‚ kalam cosmological argument
Premium Cosmological argument Existence
Explain the strengths and weaknesses of Aquinas’ Cosmological argument The Cosmological argument attempts to explain that something has caused the universe to exist and this First cause is what we call God. The argument begins with observations that try to support the following statements: • Everything in the universe has a cause • The universe itself must have a cause • To avoid infinite regress of causes there must be an uncaused cause • This uncaused cause is God The argument uses inductive
Premium Cosmological argument Existence Causality
The cosmological argument is a collection of arguments for the existence of God‚ based on the fact of the world’s existence. It was first posited by famous Greek philosophers‚ Plato and Aristotle. They postulated the need for a craftsman for the universe and began their argument with the fact of motion. The basis of the argument state that the universe cannot cause itself
Premium Cosmological argument Existence Causality
been brought forward by those who are against the claim that God exists as well as by those who are for the argument. These arguments can be of cosmological or teleological nature. Cosmological arguments are based on philosophical laws as they try to argue for or against the origin of man and how they help describe the origin of God’s existence. Teleological arguments on the other hand are also based on philosophy but instead they argue by explaining phenomena by their ends or purpose. McCloskey in
Premium Existence God Existence of God
all topic that form the point why we are how we are to the reason that we are here‚ for this reason philosophers have argue from the very begin. The point when the universe is created. I. Cosmological Argument It has lead philosophers to figure out how the universe was created‚ which lead them to use the cosmological argument‚ which is the argument of pattern in argumentation (logos) that makes an inference from certain alleged
Premium Metaphysics God Existence
The Teleological Argument for God There are many theories about how the universe‚ earth‚ and humans came into existence. Some aim to prove the existence of God‚ that a large explosion created all life‚ or even that everything has just always existed. One of these theories works to answer questions about creation and prove the existence of the Christian God; this theory is known as the Teleological argument. To expand my basis of knowledge on this subject I consulted Matthew Esters‚ who recently
Premium
Melissa Watchorn November 4‚ 2011 The Teleological Argument and its Not-so-logical Form. The teleological argument attempts to prove in its form that there is an ultimate design and therefore ultimate designer of the universe. It attempts to tell us that‚ since the universe shows some form of design (a butterfly’s wings‚ a human eye‚ etc)‚ there must be some sort of intelligent designer behind it all. The argument from design is as follows: “Watches‚ houses‚ ships‚ machines and so on all
Premium Intelligent design Evolution Charles Darwin