Do you sometimes think that the rules and laws in America aren’t fair? If you do‚ listen carefully. America is a great country with many freedoms‚ but some people like to "work the system" or break the law‚ in the law‚ so to speak. That is mainly thanks to the first amendment‚ which basically says we can do anything we want with religion‚ speech‚ press‚ assemblies‚ petition the government‚ and so on. Our government shouldn’t be so lenient. We should get rid of all the cults and gangs. The only way
Premium Law United States Political philosophy
MacKinnon’s push for the removal of the right to free speech is not only reckless‚ but extremely dangerous. As an American‚ MacKinnon fails to recognise that it is a fundamental democratic right recognized in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and that freedom of speech is far too precious a protection to be eliminated. She attempts to justify her arguments by using the example of protecting pornography. This poor argument to such an important right in the US does not represent it in
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Freedom of speech United States Constitution
As a result‚ such an argument works in favor of the employer and eliminates the issues that organizations face with union employment since workers cannot hold the management hostage. If employees demonstrate they risk being dismissed and others getting hired. Further‚ through the employment-at-will clause‚ employers can escape unnecessary lawsuits that lead to loss of income from litigation expenses. The Arguments against At-Will Agreements The at-will agreements allow employers ease of hiring as
Premium
I do not find any of the traditional proofs for God’s existence persuasive‚ and I will go over each argument one at a time to explain why I do not find them persuasive‚ starting with Anselm’s ontological argument‚ then Aquinas’ cosmological argument‚ and finally Paley’s teleological argument. First‚ Anselm’s ontological argument is not persuasive because the argument can be used to prove things that do not exist. The faulty logic is shown in Gaunilo’s Lost Island Objection because instead of putting
Premium
Right to Die Kazaray Rieckhoff Rasmussen College Author Note This paper is being submitted on September 18‚ 2014‚ for Ann Never’s M230/HSC2641 Section 08 Medical Law and Ethics course. Right to Die For this week’s written assignment we are to go over the Nancy Cruzan case and to go through the seven-step decision model to determine where or not the decision made was ethical. This model is designed to look at the facts of each case and to decide if ethical decisions are being made
Premium Death Suicide Euthanasia
Why would someone with a terminally ill condition want to die earlier than the remaining time they are given of life? Well‚ California just recently passed the right-to-die law‚ which is for those patients who are terminally ill who have the option in receiving a prescription drug that will aid them in ending their life earlier than expected. There are now five states (Oregon‚ New Hampshire‚ Vermont‚ Washington and California) that allow this option to patients. However‚ the controversy behind this
Premium Death Suicide Patient
dilemmas are seen as relative. What happens when you have to make a dire decision that does not only effect you‚ but the people around you. What happens when you have to make a decision for a chronically ill loved one? How do you handle the situation? In the case of Euthanasia‚ there is no room for error or for extreme thought processes. When thinking ethically and morally‚ one must have balance to determine proper judgement. Euthanasia‚ also called mercy killing‚ is defined as the act of putting
Premium Death Morality Ethics
remainder of this debate please keep in mind that in reference to the syllogism I provided my opponent explicitly agrees that if the premises are true‚ then the conclusion follows. Miles addresses evil in two types; Moral and Natural. Based on my arguments it seems obvious that the evil in which I am referencing is natural. Indeed‚ all of the examples I gave were natural. This is important as the word evil in the syllogism I provided is in reference to evil as I argued it. That is to say‚ natural “intense
Premium
both for and against the biotechnical process of cloning. Among the arguments presented‚ some were persuasive‚ and some were not. With anything in life‚ there are flaws‚ and that is the case with cloning. The topic of cloning presents many issues against cloning‚ for one to think about to form an opinion on the subject. The first argument that is presented revolves around the safety of cloning. Many people are concerned with how safe cloning is for the environment. The next argument deals with the
Premium Human Religion Morality
Vegetarianism From pollution and climate change to protection against major diseases‚ such as Cancer‚ Type II Diabetes‚ and Obesity‚ all of them major concerns in the 21st century(Curfman‚ 2009). Trying to find a cure in medicine and not succeeding‚ well what if medicine is the wrong way to go when trying to find cures ? Mother nature has the ability to give us all kinds of cures‚ it’s been used for thousands of years for healing and relieving our suffering. Even with all of the advances in 21st
Premium Nutrition Food Obesity