Ethical behavior can be viewed in four ways Utilitarian‚ Individualism‚ Moral-rights‚ and Commutative Justice views. These views are used to determine and assess if a behavior is ethical or unethical. Utilitarian view holds that moral behavior produces the greatest good for the greatest number (Schermerhorn 2015). This approach‚ decision maker are expected to consider the effect of every decision from all parties then select the one that optimizes satisfaction for the maximum number of people (Brown
Premium
Advances In Management ;; Vol. 5 (3) Mar. (2012) Aspects of International Business Ethics Mahoney James F. Managing Director‚ The Paragon Group. Managing Director‚ 2476 N Beechwood Ave‚ Rialto‚ California‚ USA theparagongroup@roadrunner.com Abstract This paper is an analytical examination of the ethical problems posed by the practice of international business in light of key ethical philosophies and considering the diversity existing in our world. Special attention is give to the SA 8000
Premium Ethics Business ethics
concepts: the Utilitarian and Retributive. Utilitarian theory of punishment to discourage criminal behaviors someone attempts to punish the perpetrators‚ or " shock and awe”‚ the future wrong behavior. Retribution theory attempts to punish the perpetrators because they should be punished. According to the philosophy of utilitarianism‚ the law should be used to maximize the well being of society. Since crime and punishment is inconsistent with happiness‚ should be kept to a minimum. Utilitarian understand
Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminology
aware of the world around them. Utilitarianism When studying the supreme principle of morality as utility‚ we must first examine the definition of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism the effort to answer the question of man ought to do. For a utilitarian‚ the answer is simple: Act to produce the best consequences possible for the greatest number of people possible. In this‚ liberty and harm are treated as an equal. The end goal is to produce a general welfare or Arthur’s collective well- being
Premium Ethics Morality
Why does Kant object to Utilitarian justifications of punishment? Do you agree with Kant’s objection? Explain your answer. In this essay‚ the utilitarian justification of punishment will briefly go through first. Then Kant’s objection to the utilitarian justification of punishment will be explained in the second part. In this part‚ Kant’s fundamental principle in ethics will be used to explain his view in punishment and how utilitarianism violates his principle in ethics. In the final session‚ I
Premium
What Is Ethics? Ethics is the part of philosophy that deals with good and evil. Ethics tries to answer questions like: • What actions are good? What actions are evil? • How can we tell the difference? • Are good and evil the same for everyone? • How should we make hard decisions that might help or hurt other people? The Four main studies of ethics are; • Meta-ethics‚ about the theoretical meaning of moral propositions and ethical opinions; • Normative ethics‚ an abstract set of principles
Premium Ethics
Chapter-1 (Nature of Ethics) Ethical Dilemmas The quandary people find themselves in when they have to decide if they should act in a way that might help another person or group‚ and is the “right” thing to do‚ even though doing so might not be in their own self-interest. A dilemma may also arise when a person has to decide between two different courses of action‚ knowing that whichever course he or she chooses will result in harm to one person or group even though it may benefit another. The ethical
Premium Ethics
SCHOOL OF LAW Year 2013-14 Term 1 LAW001 ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Instructor: David N. Smith Practice Professor‚ School of Law Tel: Email: Office: 6828 0788 davidsmith@smu.edu.sg School of Law‚ Room 4044‚ Level 4 COURSE DESCRIPTION Issues of ethics and social responsibility arise in all professions and all aspects of life. The failure to anticipate‚ recognize and deal effectively with these issues can have serious implications for individuals‚ companies‚ governments
Premium Ethics
offers a reductionist approach to ethics. Natural Law - Natural Law is the theory that all humans can discover what is right‚ due to moral being written into our nature in some way. This theory suggests that there are some absolute ethical standards are the set by the way the universe is and the way humans are. Natural law lies a great deal of importance on applying reason and science and the use of ’inherent’ values such as fairness. Situation Ethics - Situation ethics are based on the principle of
Premium
Ethical Dilemmas in Genetic Patenting – A Utilitarian Perspective On August 16th‚ the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that Myriad Genetics in Salt Lake City‚ Utah‚ had the right to patent ‘isolated’ genes that are linked to ovarian and breast cancers.1 This means that Myriad Genetics can prevent others from using the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in research. It also means that Myriad can charge high prices from companies that wish to use these genes. This has raised arguments about the ethical
Premium Genetics Patent Human Genome Project