ARAÑES VS. OCCIANO (Judges Solmenizing Marriage) Mercedita Arañes filed charges against Judge Salvador Occiano of the Municipal Circuit Trial Court of Batalan‚ Camarines Sur with Gross Ignorance of Law. Occiano solemnized Arañes’ marriage without the requisite marriage license in latter’s house which is outside judge’s jurisdiction. Arañes was not able to claim her right to inherit his deceased husband’s property and she was deprived of receiving her husband’s pension. Occiano avers that the ceremony
Premium Marriage Psychology Family therapy
ABESAMIS VS COURT OF APPEALS FACTS Petitioner Jerome Solco filed with the RTC of Quezon City against respondents DAE Sugar Milling Corporation‚ Azucar Management and Development Corporation‚ Eduardo L. Lopingco‚ Teody Lopingco and Rosita Lopingco‚ claiming that the sugar quedans he had purchased turned out to be worthless. Eespondent Eduardo Lopingco agreed that his personal properties under attachment shall remain attached; and that in the event of default‚ respondent also agreed that his
Premium Property Real property law Real estate
Business Law Kikuchi‚ Nikka Lei N. October 14‚ 2014 Cuadra v. Monfort Case Digest Statement of the facts: I. Maria Teresa Cuadra and Maria Teresa Monfort were classmates in Grade Six at the Mabini Elementary School in Bacolod City. On July 9‚ 1962 their teacher assigned them‚ together with three other classmates‚ to weed the grass in the school premises. While thus engaged Maria Teresa Monfort found a plastic headband‚ an ornamental object commonly worn by young girls
Free Logic Parent Mother
Case Digest HW8 – Dropbox: "It just works" Information Technology for Management (MGMTMBA 207) Questions1: Dropbox is a late mover in a crowded space. What opportunity did Houston see? Specifically‚ what are the key elements of Dropbox’s current business model? The Niche Even though Dropbox was kind of a late mover‚ it found its niche and therefore increased its market share. At the initial stage‚ Houston found the on-line storage suppliers were unable to provide fast and fluent synchronization
Premium Google Marketing Cloud computing
Re Gonzales‚ 160 SCRA 771 (1988) Fast factsRaul Gonzales forwarded an anonymous letter by “Concerned Employees of the Supreme Court” to Justice Fernan. Theletter was addressed to Gonzales referring to charges for disbarment brought by Miguel Cuenco against Justice Fernan andasking “to do something about this.” The action against Fernan was filed in the Tanodbayan. Tanodbayan – special prosecutor like a fiscal; ombudsman.Administrative Case No. 3135Resolution dated February 1988 entitled “Miguel
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States House of Representatives
Legal Publishing and Database Protection by TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Litigation and Consolidation 3 I. A Brief History 3 II. The First Big Challenge: Mead Data Central v. West Publishing Co. 4 III. The Tide Turns: Feist and Industry Consolidation 4 IV. Thomson Buys Legal Publishers‚ Prompts Antitrust Investigation 6 V. Industry Litigation Spreads: The Bender‚ Hyperlaw and Oasis Cases 7 VI. The Industry after Bender: Legal Publishers
Premium Law Publishing
Helen Palsgraf‚ Respondent‚ v. The Long Island Railroad Company‚ Appellant [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL] Court of Appeals of New York 248 N.Y. 339; 162 N.E. 99; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1269; 59 A.L.R. 1253 February 24‚ 1928‚ Argued May 29‚ 1928‚ Decided Facts: The plaintiff Helen Palsgraf was standing at the platform station of Long Island Railroad Company after buying her ticket and waiting for her train. Suddenly‚ a man carrying a package rushed to catch another train that was moving away from the platform
Premium Law
Case Digest on Natural Resources Law San Miguel Corporation vs. Court of Appeals Facts: A petition for review on certiorari was filed by San Miguel Corporation (SMC) against Court of Appeals for denying its application for registration of a parcel of land located at Sta. Anastacia‚ Sto. Tomas‚ Batangas with lot number 684 with an area of 14‚531 square meters. The lot was purchased by SMC from Silverio Perez in the amount of Php 133‚084.80 on December 23‚ 1975. Accordingly he inherited
Premium Appellate court Supreme Court of the United States Trial court
1-a. IN RE: Ramon Tulfo Facts: In Oct. 13‚ 1989‚ Tulfo wrote an article in his column in PDI ’On Target’ stating that the Supreme Court rendered an idiotic decision in legalizing checkpoints‚ and again on Oct. 16‚ 1989‚ where he called the Supreme Court stupid and "sangkatutak na mga bobo justices of the Philippine Supreme Court". Tulfo was required to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt. Tulfo said that he was just reacting emotionally because he had been a victim of harassmen
Premium Freedom of speech Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
CASE TITLE: Jessie Ching v. William Salinas‚ Sr.‚ William Salinas‚ Jr.‚ Josephine Salinas‚ Jennifer Salinas‚ Alonto Solaiman Salle‚ John Eric Salinas‚ Noel Yabut (Board of Directors and Officers of WILAWARE PROUDCT CORPORATION) PETITIONER’S CLAIMS: Petitioner’s insisted that his works are covered by Sections 172.1 and 172.2 of the Intellectual Property Code and that the copyright certificates issued by the National Library are prima facie evidence of its validity‚ citing the ruling of the United
Premium Patent Invention