Helen Palsgraf‚ Respondent‚ v. The Long Island Railroad Company‚ Appellant Facts A passenger carrying a package‚ while hurrying to catch and board a moving Long Island Rail Road train‚ appeared to two of the railroad’s (Defendant’s) employees to be falling. The employees were guards‚ one of whom was located on the car‚ the other of whom was located on the platform. The guard on the car attempted to pull the passenger into the car and the guard on the platform attempted to push him into the
Premium Tort Law Tort law
FLORES vs. COMELEC Case Digest FLORES vs. COMELEC 184 SCRA 484 Facts: Petitioner Roque Flores was declared by the board of canvassers as having the highest number of votes for kagawad on the March 1989 elections‚ in Barangay Poblacion‚ Tayum‚ Abra‚ and thus proclaimed punong barangay in accordance with Section 5 of R.A. 6679. However‚ his election was protested by private respondent Rapisora‚ who placed secondin the election with one vote less than the petitioner. The Municipal CircuitTrial
Premium Court Appeal
Friday‚ May 4‚ 2012 Domingo vs. Domingo‚ 42 SCRA 131‚ No. L-30573‚ October 29‚ 1971 Posted by Alchemy Business Center and Marketing Consultancy at 11:59 PM Labels: 1971‚ 42 SCRA 131‚ Civil Law Review‚ Domingo vs. Domingo‚No. L-30573‚ October 29 Domingo vs. Domingo‚ 42 SCRA 131‚ No. L-30573‚ October 29‚ 1971 G.R. No. L-30573 October 29‚ 1971 VICENTE M. DOMINGO‚ represented by his heirs‚ ANTONINA RAYMUNDO VDA. DE DOMINGO‚ RICARDO‚ CESAR‚ AMELIA‚ VICENTE JR.‚ SALVADOR‚ IRENE and JOSELITO‚ all surnamed
Premium English-language films Agency Money
U. S. vs Rivera GR No. 16443 March 21‚ 1921 FACTS: When Leona Laciste endeavored to set fire to the house of Martina Rivera in which 2 children of the latter were sleeping‚ the two women grappled and Leona Laciste was boloed to death by Martina Rivera. As a result‚ a criminal prosecution for murder was initiated in the Court of First Instance on La Union. DECISION OF THE LOWER COURT: Guilty of Homicide. ISSUE: Whether or not Martina Rivera is guilty of homicide. DECISION OF THE APPELLATE
Premium Trial court Criminal law Appeal
G.R. No. 80264 May 31‚ 1989 SAN MIGUEL VILLAGE SCHOOL‚ petitioner‚ vs. HONORABLE AMIR PUKUNUM D. PUNDOGAR and CHRISTINA TRIÑO‚ respondents. Estelito R. Alvia for petitioner. Macalalag Law Office & Associates for private respondent. FELICIANO‚ J.: On 2 October 1985‚ petitioner San Miguel Village School filed a complaint for breach of contract with damages against respondent Christina Triño‚ before the Regional Trial Court‚ Branch 3‚ Lanao del Norte‚ the complaint being docketed as Civil
Premium 1923
142-c. MENDOZA vs CA CECILIO MENDOZA vs THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS‚ and LUISA DE LA ROSA MENDOZA April 24‚ 1967 REYES‚ J.B.L.‚ J. Petition for Review of a decision of the CA SHORT VERSION: Luisa and Cecilio are married. Cecilio leaves her to work in the US. Luisa files a case for support. Cecilio files 1st motion to dismiss which is denied. Cecilio files answer with counterclaim challenging the validity of his marriage with Luisa. Cecilio files 2nd motion to dismiss on the ground of lack
Premium Pleading Marriage Appeal
WHITE LIGHT CORPORATION V CITY OF MANILA G.R. No. 122846 January 20‚ 2009 FACTS December 3‚ 1992‚ City Mayor Alfredo S. Lim signed into law the Manila City Ordinance No. 7774 entitled‚ “An Ordinance Prohibiting Short-Time Admission‚ Short-Time Admission Rates‚ and Wash-Up Rate Schemes in Hotels‚ Motels‚ Inns‚ Lodging Houses‚ Pension Houses‚ and Similar Establishments in the City of Manila” which prohibits short-time admission shall mean admittance and charging of room rate for less than
Premium Property Manila
Lidasan vs. Comelec GR NO. L-280892 Petioner: BARA LIDASAN Respondent: COMELEC FACTS: The Chief Executive signed the House Bill 1247 which is now known to be Republic Act 4790‚ “An Act Creating the Municipality of Dianaton in the Province of Lanao del Sur”. Such new Municipality includes 21 barrios‚ 9 of which are from Lanao del Sur‚ and the other 12 are from Cotabato. (From Lanao: Kapatagan‚ Bongabong‚ Aipang‚Dagowan‚Bakikis‚ Bungabung‚ Losain‚ Matimos‚ and Magolatung and From Cotabato:
Premium Supreme court Mindanao Lanao del Sur
G.R. No. 171118 In cases when an employee is unjustly dismissed from work‚ he shall be entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other privileges‚ inclusive of allowances‚ and other benefits or their monetary equivalent from the time the compensation was withheld up to the time of actual reinstatement. The awards of moral damages and exemplary damages are also in order and grant of attorney’s fees is likewise proper. ISSUES: 1. WON the respondents were validly dismissed
Premium Legal terms Employment Pleading
Cargill vs. Intra Strata Assurance Corporation; March 15‚ 2010 Issues: 1.Whether petitioner is doing or transacting business in the Philippines in contemplation of the law and established jurisprudence; 2.Whether respondent is estopped from invoking the defense that petitioner has no legal capacity to sue in the Philippines; Facts: Petitioner Cargill‚ Inc. (petitioner) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware‚ United States of America. Petitioner and Northern
Premium Corporation Jurisdiction Legal terms