GLOBAL REASONING TEST PRACTICE TEST © COPYRIGHT 2008 PROCTER & GAMBLE CINCINNATI‚ OH 45202 U.S.A. WARNING: All rights reserved. No part of this booklet may be reproduced in any form or by any means without expressed written permission. 2 PRACTICE TEST OVERVIEW PURPOSE This practice test is provided to help you understand the rules for answering the Reasoning Test by giving you: • • • • The exact instructions that you will receive when taking the actual Reasoning Test Suggestions and strategies
Premium Question Assessment Multiple choice
When the constitution was written‚ the idea of universal suffrage was too radical for our founding fathers to address. They decided to leave the states with the authority to decide the requirements for voting. (Janda) By allowing the states to decide who voted‚ the authors had not intended for each state ’s discriminations to prevent the country from maintaining true democracy. However‚ by not setting up a nationwide regulation‚ the authors launched the country into a century and a half long fight
Free Women's suffrage Women's rights Seneca Falls Convention
1) Charles doesn’t tell Chig right away about his plan to visit his family. This idea or implication can help in deducing an inference of Charles’s feelings about the visit. For instance‚ when someone doesn’t tell right away about his/her plan to visit a certain location‚ he/she doesn’t really seem filled with excitement‚ anticipation‚ or even happiness. As a result‚ there could be a critical or momentous reason for doing that such as having the presence of a conflict or enigma. Similarly‚ Charles
Premium Reasoning Thought Logic
Short Essay on Deductive Reasoning Deduction is taught through the study of formal logic. Logic (both inductive and deductive logic) is the science of good reasoning. It is called formal because its main concern is with creating forms that serve as models to demonstrate both correct and incorrect reasoning. The difference is that‚ unlike induction‚ where an inference is drawn from an accumulation of evidence‚ deduction is a process that reasons about relationships between classes‚ characteristics
Premium
Career Path and Reasoning Aptitude Below we will be discussing the results of the reasoning aptitude evaluation. This evaluation discusses the strengths and opportunity competencies that one may need to become more successful in their career path. Below I will be evaluating my strengths and weaknesses when developing my career path and how I work in a group‚ or on a team. As stated by Stacy Flint (2013)” When planning and choosing a career it helps to know the many benefits reasoning aptitude testing
Premium Improve Thought
Describe the situation at Lehman Brothers from an ethics perspective. What’s your opinion of what happened there? The ethical issue here was that Lehman’s executives exploited loopholes in the accounting standards to manipulate their balance sheet in order to mislead the investing public. Using “Repo 105”‚ Lehman was able to clear huge amount unprofitable assets off its balance sheet instead of selling at loss. Evidence pointed out that the chief executive‚ Richard Ruld‚ knew about the use of
Premium Ethics
A Case-Based Retrieval System for Diabetic Patients Therapy Stefania Montani 1 Riccardo Bellazzi1 ‚ Luigi Portinale 2 Stefano Fiocchi 3 and Mario Stefanelli1 ‚ ‚ Abstract. We propose a decision support tool based on the Case Based Reasoning technique‚ meant to help physicians in the retrieval of past similar cases‚ able to provide a suggestion about the revision of diabetic patients’ therapy scheme. A case is defined as a set of features collected during a visit. A taxonomy of prototypical
Free Insulin Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus type 1
Individual Influence of Moral Reasoning I am interested in the actions of star witness Mike McQueary. I am not going to focus on the abuse I am focusing on the morality of the decisions Mike McQueary made when he saw the abuse. It is his actions that drive me to answer the Individual Influence of Moral Reasoning. Mike McQueary reported to administration that Jerry Sandusky engaged in a sexual act with a student in 2001. What I am interested in about his actions is that when they were not appropriately
Premium Pennsylvania Ethics Morality
In Benjamin Franklin’s autobiography Franklin speaks of human reasoning‚ explaining how he himself reasoned his way to eating fish without eating animal food. Although Franklin does oppose his agreement of not eating animal food‚ he argues how humans are these “reasonable creatures” that can come up with a good reason for them to do what they want. A reason is like an excuse that can be used to get what you want. Franklin argues that humans are “reasonable creatures” that are enable to create
Premium Reason Thought Human
Professor Michael Sandel discussed both “consequentialist moral reasoning” and “categorical moral reasoning” (Harvard University‚ n.d.). Sandel states that “categorical moral reasoning” is when you “locate morality in certain duties and rights” (Harvard University‚ n.d.). And “consequentialist moral reasoning” is when you “locate morality from consequences of your actions” (Harvard University‚ n.d.). Basically‚ “categorical moral reasoning” focuses on the “consequences”‚ after “action” is taken‚ before
Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative