The Edict of Nantes was put in on April 13‚ 1598 by Henry IV of France. The Edict of Nantes gave the huguenots or the Calvinists protestants basic rights in a majority Catholic state. In the Edict of Nantes‚ Henry tried his best to push unity among the people. The Edict of Nantes treated some of the people with tolerance‚ and the Edict opened up a way for secularism to creep in. Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes and he also demanded all the Huguenot churches and all of the protestant schools
Premium Christianity French Revolution Catholic Church
objective of this paper is to clarify the rules of making a valid ‘acceptance’ which may lead to making a binding contract between the parties. Keywords: Offer‚ Acceptance‚ Rules of acceptance‚ Communication of acceptance‚ Unqualified acceptance‚ Revocation of acceptance 1. Introduction ‘Acceptance’ is one of the fundamental elements for making a binding contract. It is essential to determine when an acceptance is complete and a binding contract emerges. At the beginning of a business contract‚ the
Premium Contract
The current case encompasses to separate sets of facts and actors. Although distinct in certain areas‚ both proceedings revolve around the same basic issue: a fourteen year old convicted of murder and sentenced to mandatory life imprisonment without parole. Consequently‚ the matter was addressed jointly as opposed to separately. In November of 1999‚ fourteen year old Kuntrell Jackson and two other boys set out to rob a nearby video store. In route‚ Jackson learned that one of the other conspirators
Premium Jury Crime Murder
Introduction Plaintiff: Bill‚ Charles & Don Defendant: Allan Allan advertised his motorcar for sale at $50‚000. Bill‚ Charles and Don came down for viewing. The entire three customers Bill‚ Charles and Don each have their own negotiating reasons with Allan. Allan did not response and remains silent. After that Eric was last person to come down for viewing the car. Liked and accepted Allan offers‚ immediately the car was sold to him. Having to hear that the car was already been sold‚ the plaintiffs
Premium Law Contract Common law
the action‚ in view of its finality‚ from one which would be advisory in nature. The same situation is true here. The action of the respondents was in no respect advisory but would‚ unless restrained‚ result in the actual release of the inmates on parole in violation of the statute and of the minimum sentence imposed by the
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States Constitution
not of age. 2. In order for an offer to be valid it must include the following elements the offer‚ acceptance‚ consideration‚ defenses‚ and writing required. An offer can be terminated by revocation‚ this occurs before the offeree accepts the agreement‚ only then can an offer be terminated by revocation. An offer can also be terminated by rejection this happens when the offer carries no legal binding and the oferee is free to accept or decline. 3. Those who wrote the UVV understood that
Premium Contract
CJUS Final Review 1. Know what the Fifth Amendment limits? Limitations on the exercise of governmental power or authority and prevent person from being tried twice for the same offense‚ testify against himself. 2. Sixth Amendment guarantees what? The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to legal counsel at all significant stages of a criminal proceeding. 3. The eighth amendment bars what? U.S. constitutional amendment forbidding excessive bail‚ excessive fines‚ and cruel and unusual
Premium Prison Crime
But the main difference is that a parole officer works with people who have been released from prison but still have to finish out their sentence‚ where as a probation officer work with people who don’t have to go back to prison but have a sentence to fulfill outside of prison. They both have to live their lives with restrictions and rules. Parole officers and probation officers monitor these people and inform the court system on their progress. Because parole officers and probation officers have
Premium Employment Wage Minimum wage
them as the Chairman of the Board. The Board will examine the notice of opposition along with the documents filed in relation thereof and submits a report to the Controller. The Controller‚ on the recommendation from the Board‚ will arrange for a hearing with a time period of minimum ten days. In such a hearing‚ if the Controller finds that the patent was obtained wrongfully‚ the patent will stand amended accordingly. Renewal: Section 53 of the Act provides that a patent will cease to have effect
Premium Patent Patent application Patentability
Unjust Justice: Juveniles Serving Life Without Parole The 14th amendment of Constitution of the United States grants every American Citizen the right of due process of the law. This right is being denied juveniles sentenced to “life without parole”. Recent Supreme Court rulings have held that “life without parole” is cruel and unjust punishment for those juveniles sentenced for non-homicidal crimes‚ because of limited capacity. Life without parole is essentially cruel and unjust punishment for
Free Crime Criminal law Prison