PCR0025 Critical Thinking All Foundation ONLINE NOTES LOGICAL FALLACIES Logical fallacy: An argument that contains a mistake in reasoning. 2 major groups: 1. Fallacies of relevance 2. Fallacies of insufficient evidence Fallacies of Relevance Mistakes in reasoning that occur because the premises are logically irrelevant to the conclusions. 1. Personal Attack 2. Attacking the motive 3. Look Who’s Talking (Tu Quoque) 4. Two Wrongs Make a Right 5. Scare Tactics 6. Appeal to Pity 7
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy Logic
Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following questions: • What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? • What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written‚ oral‚ and visual arguments? What might you do to avoid fallacies in your thinking? 1. According to The Random House Dictionary‚ assumptions is the act of taking for granted or supposing
Premium Critical thinking Thought
Associate Level Material Appendix D Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following questions: • What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? An assumption is something we take for granted or presuppose‚ usually it is something we previously learned and do not question. It is part of our system of beliefs. We assume our beliefs to
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy Logic
falling into the trap of conjunction fallacy. People caught in conjunction fallacy find it easier to conceive two events occurring together than them happening separately. To be more precise a conjunction fallacy occurs when two events which can occur together or alone are seen more likely to happen in combination than isolation. This usually happens when it is easier to imagine two events occurring in a combination than occurring alone. It is a formal fallacy that occurs when it is supposed that
Premium Critical thinking Argumentation theory Logic
During this debate there are arguments constantly going and many‚ many fallacies being made non-stop and rhetorical strategies always being used. Most of the arguments that appear throughout the debate were based off of an question that was asked by the audience or the host‚ and this is when everything happens due to the candidates committing so many fallacies to persuade Americans that they are fit for the position to be the President. During the debate the candidates were questioned on things that
Premium President of the United States United States Barack Obama
I THE FUSION FALLACY If an Australian lawyer were asked about the significance of 1975 in the development of Australian law‚ he or she would no doubt point to the famous constitutional crisis that culminated‚ on Armistice Day of that year‚ in the use by the Governor-General of the ‘reserve powers’ to dismiss the government of the day. That event generated great legal and political controversy for many years‚ and ‘left many unresolved problems’.[2] Yet‚ except as an issue in the now muted republican
Premium Law United States United States Constitution
control over our emotions. However‚ emotions may go as far as to reason with our minds‚ validating/disproving claims irrationally. Emotional reasoning fallacy is the error of letting our emotions to dictate our logical thinking and validation capabilities. We refuse to accept facts and evidence because they cause emotional distress to ourselves. A great example would be charity statistics. The Justice Board of British Columbia reports that 1 out of every 3 women have experienced sexual assault in their
Premium Psychology Cognition Mind
«12 angry men» In the movie «12 angry men»‚ one can explore a variety of fallacies and generalizations. Each juror except for one comes in with a verdict of «Guilty»‚ but by using critical thinking the reasons to support their claim are dismissed one by one. Except for Juror number three who is the last one to change his verdict. He disregards all critical reasoning and sticks to his initial claim using multiple fallacies to support it. He is clearly prejudiced towards the defendant no mater the
Premium Jury Not proven Law
WRITTEN REPORT FOR "LOVE IS A FALLACY" BY MAX SHULMAN ENGLISH - III St. Jerome Group 5 Gabrielle Rara Rona Sahonlay Daniela Tan Kent Sobiono Mae Tio Alhirt Bahala Jett Gumaling Mr. Jesus Allaga Montajes ENGLISH - III Adviser LOVE IS A FALLACY Max Shulman Summary This short story is about two roommates‚ who need each other. One favors materialistic objects‚ and wishes he had a raccoon coat‚ and the other favors looks‚ and beauty‚ and wishes he had a certain girl to go steady with. The main
Premium
Fallacy Summary and Application Paper What information can be gathered from‚ "Begging the Question‚" "Hasty Generalization‚" and "Appealing to Emotion?" Though from first glance‚ they generally do not have much in common. However‚ when looking deeper‚ you will see that they are all different types of logical fallacies. Logical fallacies‚ by definition‚ are errors of reasoning. Or‚ to put it in a simpler form‚ errors that may be recognized and corrected by prudent thinkers (Downes‚ 1995)
Premium Appeal to emotion Argument Fallacy