TORT‚ PRODUCT LIABILITY‚ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY‚ CRIMINAL and PROPERTY LAW CASE ANALYSIS TORT CASE OVERVIEW LEGAL ASPECTS 535 PROFESSOR T. RICE MEMORANDUM TO: Professor T. Rice FROM: RE: Denny v. Ford Motor Company (Tort Law) FILE: Court of Appeals of New York‚ 1995 639 N.Y.S. 2d 250 DATE: April 6‚ 2014 Conclusion: Nancy Denny (Plaintiff) was driving her Ford Bronco II in June of 1986‚ when she slammed on the brakes to avoid hitting a deer that had walked in front of her vehicle
Premium Strict liability Tort Contract
This paper will discuss the hypothetical scenario and case problem 4.4 and its implications on unintentional tort or negligence. It can be found on page 124 of our textbook Business Law Today: Essentials‚ written by Roger LeRoy Miller and Gaylord A. Jentz. As read in the case‚ “Kim went to Ling ’s Market to pick up a few items for dinner. It was a rainy‚ windy day‚ and the wind had blown water through the door of Ling ’s Market each time the door opened. As Kim entered through the door‚ she slipped
Premium Law Tort Tort law
Torts Exam Notes Intentional Torts Trespass to the Person Battery - directly and intentionally (or negligently) bringing about a harmful or offensive contact with the person of another - the ‘body is inviolate‚ and that any touching of another person‚ however slight may amount to a battery’ - Rixon - doesn’t have to cause harm - Rixon v Starcity Casino - Collins v Wilcock - no requirement of hostility or anger - Wilson v Pringle - In Re F - exception is made
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
Jenny visited the premises from which she lived 20 minutes away and was told by Paul that the purchase would be the best bargain in town and that the profits were 40‚000 pounds per annum‚ and that if she didn’t believe him she should look at the accounts which she declined but had she done so she would have discovered that the profits had never exceeded 25‚000 pounds and were on a downward trend. Paul also told jenny that it was very busy especially on a Saturday and she may not be able to move because
Premium Misrepresentation Contract law
Mrs. Donoghue bought her a bottle of ginger beer‚ which contained a composed snail and caused Mrs. Donoghue to be ill. Since Mrs. Donoghue did not buy the beer‚ she could not sue under contract law but in tort. The Court held that manufacturer owed duty of care to Mrs. Donoghue and that duty was breached. The rationales behind were that Mrs. Donoghue should have had in their mind as being influenced by their careless behavior. People owe duty of care to their neighbor‚ who is anyone whom they can
Premium Tort Duty of care Tort law
Assessment A common misconception by the supporters of the 2003 Medical Malpractice Tort Reform Act was that medical malpractice litigation was responsible for increasing healthcare costs and limited access to care. In retrospect‚ tort reform did have a number of demonstrable effects. The effect on health care administrators‚ patients and lawyers‚ and the current and future economic impact greatly outweigh the benefits of tort reform. Health Care Administrators The 2003 statue caused health care administrators
Premium Medical malpractice Health care Physician
different learning patterns and that everyone’s learning patterns are very unique. One person may learn best when following directions exactly‚ another person may learn their best by just doing it. Before this class‚ I felt that it was only one way to do things‚ and that was by reading directions and following them. I now know that the way everyone learns is as different as the way that we look. I learn best by following directions‚ asking lots of questions‚ making lists‚ and using methods that I have
Premium Learning Intelligence Psychology
……………………………………………………….….Page 3 2.Tort case …………………………………………………………………………..Page 4‚ 5 3. Contract Cases………………………………………………………………….Page 5‚ 6‚ 7 4. References…………………………………………………………………………Page 7 Introduction The area of law that is covers the majority of all civil laws. Essentially‚ every claim that arises in civil court with the exception of contractual disputes falls under tort law. The concept of tort law is to correct a wrong done to
Premium Contract
harm‚ the foreseeable severity of harm that may ensue‚ and the burden of precautions to eliminate or reduce the risk of harm. See Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm § 3 (P.F.D. No. 1‚ 2005). Negligent conduct may consist of either an act‚ or an omission to act when there is a duty to do so. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282 (1965). Five elements are required to establish a prima facie case of negligence: the existence of a legal duty to exercise reasonable care; a failure
Premium Tort Common law Tort law
Torts Assignment 2011 Semester 2 Fred v Ivan- Battery Battery is committed when there is an intentional‚ direct‚ and unlawful contact or without consent to another’s person. Ivan intentionally made unlawful contact with Fred when he thrust his hands into Fred’s pocket. It was apparent that although the contact was with his pants’ pocket rather than directly to the body‚ the contact did involve some element of forces and that ‘the least touching of another in anger is battery’. Hence‚ the element
Premium Tort Negligence