the DEAR for the following portfolio with and without the correlation coefficients. Estimated Assets DEAR S‚FX S‚B FX‚B Stocks (S) $300 000 -0.10 0.75 0.20 Foreign exchange (FX) $200 000 Bonds (B) $250 000 What is the amount of risk reduction resulting from the lack of perfect positive correlation between the various assets groups? The DEAR for a portfolio with perfect correlation would be $750 000. Therefore the risk reduction is $750 000
Premium Financial markets Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient Risk
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Statement of the Problem 5 1.3 Significance of Study 6 1.4 Research Objective 6 S1.5 Hypotheses 8 1.6 Terminology Definition 9 1.7 Limitation of the Study 11 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 12 2.1 Family Strength 12 2.2 Relationship between Personal Characteristic and Family Strength 12 2.3 Relationship between Family Characteristic and Family Strength 14 2.4 Prosocial Behavior 15 2.5 Relationship between Personal Characteristic
Premium Family Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient Behavior
4. Is there a significant correlation between customers’ total spending on books and their total spending on non-book products? There is no significant correlation between customers’ total spending on books and their total spending on non-book products. Correlations Total $ spent on books Total $ spent on non-book products Total $ spent on books Pearson Correlation 1 .157** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 50000 50000 Total $ spent on non-book products Pearson Correlation .157** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000
Premium Gender Male Female
Grounded Theory 5 5 Case study 5 5.1 Developing a Coding Framework 6 Developing codes. 6 Conceptualization. 6 Developing Categorizations. 6 5.2 Results of Data analysis 7 Descriptive statistics. 7 Correlations. 12 6 Discussion 20 6.1 Analysis of further correlations 20 What is liked and loved?. 20 When do users seek help via Facebook?. 20 Does time matter? 21 When do people use which speech component? 21 What is a Facebook user daily schedule? 22 What do Facebook
Premium Spearman's rank correlation coefficient Facebook Correlation and dependence
120‚000 15‚000 120‚000 Alternative 4 0 30‚000 30‚000 a. Sue Pansky is a risk avoider and should use the maximin decision approach. She should do nothing and not make an investment in Starting Right. b. Ray Cahn should use a coefficient of realism of 0.11. The best decision is to do nothing. c. Lila Battle should eliminate alternative 1 of doing nothing and apply the maximin criterion. The result is to invest in the corporate bonds. d. George Yates should use the equally likely
Premium Overtime Maintenance Preventive maintenance
Proceedings 2nd CBRC‚ Lahore‚ Pakistan November 14‚ 2009 DETERMINANTS OF EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN TELECOM SECTOR OF PAKISTAN Madiha Shoaib Army Public College of Management Sciences (APCOMS) Ordnance Road‚ Rawalpindi madiha.rehan2008@gmail.com Ayesha Noor Army Public College of Management Sciences (APCOMS) Ordnance Road‚ Rawalpindi ayesha.noor86@gmail.com Syed Raza Tirmizi Army Public College of Management Sciences (APCOMS) Ordnance Road‚ Rawalpindi syedrazatirmizi@yahoo.com Sajid Bashir
Premium Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient Employment
key factor identified are significant to the overall satisfaction of the smart phones. H1: The level of satisfaction on features is significantly related to the overall satisfaction of a Samsung smart phone. The Pearson Correlation analysis proved that there was a positive correlation of the satisfaction level on features of the smart phone and its overall satisfaction. Thus‚ the higher the satisfaction level of the phone’s features‚ the increase in overall satisfaction of the smart phone. Next
Premium Research Scientific method Mobile phone
the research. Your hypothesis might be that there is a positive correlation (for example‚ the number of hours of study & your midterm exam scores)‚ or a negative correlation (for example‚ your levels of stress & your exam scores). A perfect correlation would be an r = +1.0 & -1.0‚ while no correlation would be r = 0. Perfect correlations would almost never occur; expect to see correlations much less than + or - 1.0. Although correlation can’t prove a causal relationship‚ it can be used for prediction
Premium Scientific method Correlation and dependence Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient
Introduction It has been quite a challenging task for the Human Resource Management people to design such strategies which will transform the workforce as motivated and retained for high performance work organization (Thompson‚ 2004). HRM makes continuous efforts to develop such policies which will motivate the human resource for sustained competitive advantage (Barney’s‚ 1991‚ Wright‚ et al.‚ 1994). These efforts must include incentives‚ pay packages which makes an employee more comfortable and
Premium Employment Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient Customer satisfaction
a series of 43 life events in the previous two years. The alternative hypothesis: There will be a positive correlation between stress and physical illness will be found The Null hypothesis: There will not be a positive correlation between stress and physical illness and the result will be due to chance Method Design: The design for this research is a positive correlation study based on two questionnaires; Stress questionnaire (see appendix I) and a physical illness (see appendix II)
Premium Illness Null hypothesis Correlation and dependence